BY THE WAY, saying that it is revenge because the fiancé of Na Hwa Jin and Choi Gangseok's daughter died because…
yes i do agree about that. actually that accusation is easily to counter.
Mr. education minister can easily said that her daughter's dead is the catalyst, her daughter is martyr for reforms in their education system. Thus he can gain sympathy from teachers.
I watched episode 1 and wasn't as hooked as I thought I would be. Firstly, it was too unrealistic. Burning down…
story wise, it isn't realistic, at all. like you said, fire is hard to control, let alone the politics later on.
but the dopamine here is when justice instantly served. it gave a pleasure seeing those baddies got punished, things that really hard to be happen in real life.
No. It didn't get better, repetitive formula, different cases. and there will be more unrealistic things happened past episode 01.
It's a general law that underage can't be punished for crimes, even murder. The differences between countries…
I think we need to renew what is called as underage.
Highschool students true is underage. But their physicality is as near as an adult. Worse, they have more energy, while still in puberty, and their frontal lobe isn't fully developed.
In shorts, highschool age is kid brain in an adult body.
People have no idea how violent kids are here in North America. In public schools, kids who assault other kids…
It's happened to most democracy based country.
Because of human rights.
At least in my culture, Millenials didn't want their children raised like they were in the past (physical force sometimes used as a disciplinary action).
Not exactly record since it's already there, but it doesn't have any power unless brought to an authority's attention…
Yeah i mean record as screenshot the chats, because chats can be deleted. In one scene she deleted her social account, it can be evidence that the parent have violated her boundaries.
But okay, I understand now. It's not because she is clueless, but because of feeling of helpless.
In my country chat record can be brought as evidence in court, but I think it depends on the case
some resolutions are utopist (instant justice, usually legal battle take too much energy, and time), but i like the idea.
the episode where a parent control the elementary school teacher, actually the teacher can record their chat as a proof right? it's typing based communication, so there is actual proof that the parent were violating teacher's rights?
genuinely asking to someone who really know this kind of matter. thank you in advance.
it sorted by cases so it make easier to find the actor we look for.
Most things is overly fantasy, unrealistic.
actually that accusation is easily to counter.
Mr. education minister can easily said that her daughter's dead is the catalyst, her daughter is martyr for reforms in their education system.
Thus he can gain sympathy from teachers.
She is honest, no sugarcoat, direct, violent, but loyal.
but he played in series too, one i remember is Sweet Home.
He played as soldier, once again, action one.
like you said, fire is hard to control, let alone the politics later on.
but the dopamine here is when justice instantly served.
it gave a pleasure seeing those baddies got punished, things that really hard to be happen in real life.
No.
It didn't get better, repetitive formula, different cases.
and there will be more unrealistic things happened past episode 01.
i know how bad kids can be, but those are beyond baddest 14yo kid i ever knew.
i don't know if kids nowadays can be like that.
Highschool students true is underage. But their physicality is as near as an adult. Worse, they have more energy, while still in puberty, and their frontal lobe isn't fully developed.
In shorts, highschool age is kid brain in an adult body.
Because of human rights.
At least in my culture, Millenials didn't want their children raised like they were in the past (physical force sometimes used as a disciplinary action).
In one scene she deleted her social account, it can be evidence that the parent have violated her boundaries.
But okay, I understand now. It's not because she is clueless, but because of feeling of helpless.
In my country chat record can be brought as evidence in court, but I think it depends on the case
the most entertaining part is when we see justice gets served instantly.
the episode where a parent control the elementary school teacher, actually the teacher can record their chat as a proof right?
it's typing based communication, so there is actual proof that the parent were violating teacher's rights?
genuinely asking to someone who really know this kind of matter.
thank you in advance.
genuinely asking because i didn't read it