He brought that old man aura to life in Moonlight Chicken and what's with your obsession with Earth acting as…
You're incoherent and hysterical, seeking out conflict where there is none. YOU are the only person in this thread who has said anything about Earth's looks, one way or the other, numbskull. YOU are the one who keeps referring to a 40-year-old man as "old," no one else. Earth is very handsome. I have always thought so. You should take your mindless, fangirling somewhere where people might actually pay attention to it. The last good thing Earth was in was Moonlight Chicken. It is entertaining that GMMTV's failure to properly use his talents has made you into a crazy, spittle-spewing weirdo.
What a wonderful and bizarre little horror film. I first began watching loads of Asian films and series not quite four years ago. I'm pretty sure it has taken all that time to get me to a head-place where I can enjoy this kind of wild-ass Japanese weirdness.
Low budget, a few plot holes sure, but overall, I recommend. The twisted visions and macabre sensibility make up for what the film lacks in the way of $$$.
Clearly, you're not capable of understanding my above comment, which already, directly addresses the point you think you're making. Gay-baiting a non-gay show is the OPPOSITE of effective marketing. Don't be disingenuous.
lolThey will all disappear once they age out of BL. Maybe only a few like Nanon will remain
lol Quoting Thai directors, the creators of the most banal, poorly-written, badly acted, and nonsensical BLs on the planet, in support of the awesomeness of Nanon does exactly the opposite of what you think it does.
And of course, we all know directors say EXACTLY what they really think in public interviews, fan events, etc.
I almost dropped it about a quarter of the way in; I just wasn't feeling it. But then, certain things came to light and all of a sudden I could not look away from the screen; a state of being which stuck with me until the end of the film.
I'm American and have seen The Blair Witch Project three or four times, appreciating it more with each watch over the years. I was thrilled with the references/homages to TBWP in this film, not only because they were there but because they intensified the horror and moved the action forward significantly. In other words, the references weren't just thrown in as insider-ish schtick for those in the know. You don't have to have seen Blair Witch to be thrilled by this film, but having done so will notch up the terror even more.
9.5/10
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED TO FANS OF SUPERNATURAL HORROR, MY FAVE KIND. I am much more frightened by what I sense or suspect but cannot see than I am by the visible, such as slasher-killers, chainsaws, and machetes.
I'm not sure what you mean by this, so I'll clarify my own comment. I meant that when it comes to ratings on MDL, up is down and down is up/east is west and vice-versa.
The better a show is, the lower it's MDL rating will be and vice-versa. Is there some overall MDL top 25 list I'm not aware of? I'm guessing that list would be my own bottom 25.
My Mom's Lover is so hilariously bad it's good. I love the woman presenter/narrator who passes prim judgement on the moral failings and evil behaviors of the various protagonists. lol The Filipinos are really good at this sort of shriekingly melodramatic silliness.
Everything about the episode was outrageously predictable but the two actors are hot and the mom is beautiful, so even watching them act badly and spout the nonsense dialogue was a sort of hot, enjoyable absurdity. lol
I also found the first episode a bit slow but I don't think this harsh assumption for the entire show is accurate…
You say dramatic, I say creative.
You didn't answer my question: How do you determine if you're talking to a mature, well-written 12-year-old who says they're 19?
You think people under 18 don't curse and talk about sex? It's fun probing you're mindset. You get prickly when your assumptions are challenged. I didn't accuse you of anything in my comment above.
I also found the first episode a bit slow but I don't think this harsh assumption for the entire show is accurate…
Whatever. I stalked your profile earlier to see what sort of nutjob I was dealing with. Two issues:
1. Your rave "review" of this TOOT reads as a parody of the MDL LG mindset. Thanks for the laughs. 2. How do you determine if someone who wants to chat with you is 18 years of age or younger? Are you clairvoyant? 2B: Why do you care if a correspondent is younger than 18? Do you believe all people 17 and below are stupid? Are you afraid the police are reading your messages and you will be caught? Did you know it's not illegal to chat with teenagers? Do you suffer pedophile urges and fear triggering them by interacting with anyone under 18? Did you know pedophilia is an attraction to pre-adolescent CHILDREN, not teenagers? Are you attracted to children? If so, you should drop your chat-age rule to 10 and below.
Did you know a lot of 17-year-olds are more mature and wiser than a lot of 70-year-olds?
I also found the first episode a bit slow but I don't think this harsh assumption for the entire show is accurate…
I fully acknowledge listing the qualities I see in your comments/you. But you are the one who falsely claims them as signs of anger and then responds with (anger-based?) insults of his own. lol Which I guess, means YOU are angry...or something? :P
I do keep responding. However, I am not the one claiming to "not care" about what you're responding to, even as you respond...or something.
omg, B, I just realized this is YOU I'm talking to. hahaha I forgot about the name change. Who the hell is Honglou Meng? :)
I don't know how you make it through these horrible Thai BLs...especially as you are so otherwise educated and well-read. Is it a form of slumming? For me, such shows are painful to watch and I start thinking of all the other millions of live-action movies/series from all over the world I could be watching...and I'm out.
I also found the first episode a bit slow but I don't think this harsh assumption for the entire show is accurate…
"...maybe you're just too interested in toxic or unstable relationships. Seems you're a bit too dramatic with you're opinions..." This is the comment of an insulting, angry person, sort of like you accuse me of being. Where did I say anything about toxic or unstable relationships?
If you don't care about my opinion, try not replying to me multiple times. MDLers frequently accuse commenters who diss their pet shows as being "angry" or "upset," in an attempt to devalue opinions they disagree with. Your angry schtick is typical.
As an example of "dense," how about your lack of understanding that clicking on and watching this show anywhere adds to its audience ratings and thus its revenue stream.
Another lame, passive-aggressive closing remark. Can't help yourself, can you?
YOU are the only person in this thread who has said anything about Earth's looks, one way or the other, numbskull.
YOU are the one who keeps referring to a 40-year-old man as "old," no one else.
Earth is very handsome. I have always thought so. You should take your mindless, fangirling somewhere where people might actually pay attention to it.
The last good thing Earth was in was Moonlight Chicken.
It is entertaining that GMMTV's failure to properly use his talents has made you into a crazy, spittle-spewing weirdo.
This nonsense again.
How, exactly, am I "stopping" anyone from doing anything?
I first began watching loads of Asian films and series not quite four years ago. I'm pretty sure it has taken all that time to get me to a head-place where I can enjoy this kind of wild-ass Japanese weirdness.
Low budget, a few plot holes sure, but overall, I recommend. The twisted visions and macabre sensibility make up for what the film lacks in the way of $$$.
8.5/10
Quoting Thai directors, the creators of the most banal, poorly-written, badly acted, and nonsensical BLs on the planet, in support of the awesomeness of Nanon does exactly the opposite of what you think it does.
And of course, we all know directors say EXACTLY what they really think in public interviews, fan events, etc.
Because it's MDL. Up is down, crap is king.
I almost dropped it about a quarter of the way in; I just wasn't feeling it. But then, certain things came to light and all of a sudden I could not look away from the screen; a state of being which stuck with me until the end of the film.
I'm American and have seen The Blair Witch Project three or four times, appreciating it more with each watch over the years. I was thrilled with the references/homages to TBWP in this film, not only because they were there but because they intensified the horror and moved the action forward significantly. In other words, the references weren't just thrown in as insider-ish schtick for those in the know. You don't have to have seen Blair Witch to be thrilled by this film, but having done so will notch up the terror even more.
9.5/10
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED TO FANS OF SUPERNATURAL HORROR, MY FAVE KIND.
I am much more frightened by what I sense or suspect but cannot see than I am by the visible, such as slasher-killers, chainsaws, and machetes.
https://kisskh.at/shows/top_korean_dramas
I meant that when it comes to ratings on MDL, up is down and down is up/east is west and vice-versa.
The better a show is, the lower it's MDL rating will be and vice-versa. Is there some overall MDL top 25 list I'm not aware of? I'm guessing that list would be my own bottom 25.
The Filipinos are really good at this sort of shriekingly melodramatic silliness.
Everything about the episode was outrageously predictable but the two actors are hot and the mom is beautiful, so even watching them act badly and spout the nonsense dialogue was a sort of hot, enjoyable absurdity. lol
Well done, Philippines! :)
Anyway, this has grown tiresome.
You didn't answer my question: How do you determine if you're talking to a mature, well-written 12-year-old who says they're 19?
You think people under 18 don't curse and talk about sex?
It's fun probing you're mindset. You get prickly when your assumptions are challenged.
I didn't accuse you of anything in my comment above.
1. Your rave "review" of this TOOT reads as a parody of the MDL LG mindset. Thanks for the laughs.
2. How do you determine if someone who wants to chat with you is 18 years of age or younger? Are you clairvoyant?
2B: Why do you care if a correspondent is younger than 18?
Do you believe all people 17 and below are stupid?
Are you afraid the police are reading your messages and you will be caught?
Did you know it's not illegal to chat with teenagers?
Do you suffer pedophile urges and fear triggering them by interacting with anyone under 18?
Did you know pedophilia is an attraction to pre-adolescent CHILDREN, not teenagers?
Are you attracted to children? If so, you should drop your chat-age rule to 10 and below.
Did you know a lot of 17-year-olds are more mature and wiser than a lot of 70-year-olds?
I do keep responding. However, I am not the one claiming to "not care" about what you're responding to, even as you respond...or something.
Not your guy.
I don't know how you make it through these horrible Thai BLs...especially as you are so otherwise educated and well-read. Is it a form of slumming? For me, such shows are painful to watch and I start thinking of all the other millions of live-action movies/series from all over the world I could be watching...and I'm out.
If you don't care about my opinion, try not replying to me multiple times. MDLers frequently accuse commenters who diss their pet shows as being "angry" or "upset," in an attempt to devalue opinions they disagree with. Your angry schtick is typical.
As an example of "dense," how about your lack of understanding that clicking on and watching this show anywhere adds to its audience ratings and thus its revenue stream.
Another lame, passive-aggressive closing remark. Can't help yourself, can you?