JohnGotti

HA! HA! HA! The old "catch a cold" while getting wet in the rain! LMFAO! Wow! This trope is soooo overused. But, it's ok. LOL! The ep. was still pretty good.

P.S. I also want to compliment you on subtly reminding us that they're simply actors doing their jobs by "playing a role."

I didn't realize that. 🤔

Good points.

You may have a point. Agree with the analysis of sub/dom and top/bottom paradigm. But I originally stated top/bottom and was corrected to sub/dom. That still remains a complicated issue.

Thanks. I didn't know that 😳.

AGREED! If nothing but to mix things up, allow the "ships" take on different dom/sub roles, such as in Pit Babe.

Totally agree with you about the The Heart Killers. I liked that series. IMO, Dunk played his role to the bust! But he still portrayed the "sub" role to Joong's "dom" role. Other than the source material, why couldn't their roles be reversed?

I think I will skip this. I'm getting tired of the Joong (top)/Dunk (bottom) scenario. I know it's done for fanservice. But once in awhile I think they could at least switch it up -- Dunk (top)/Jung(bottom) and give them BOTH an opportunity to play a different type of character.

🤣

Interesting about Tony! I never thought of that 🤔. Thanks for the clarification on Way. At first. I thought it would be the evil twin plot. 😆

I'm really curious about how they're going to pull season 2 off. OK. Tony faking his death is one thing. Way faking his death is another! Plus, all the guys who were Pit Babe and Charlie's enemies have joined forces and is with Tony. Hmmm! They threw in everything but the kitchen sink on these previews. I hope the story will be much better. Because, I liked Pit Babe season one. It was a bit different. I guess we'll have to season if S2 can be just as good or better than S1.

Very good points! I've not read the manga, so I'm not familiar with Akin's character. So, I ask the question, why even go to who's top or who's bottom at all. Why can't they be "equal" in bed as far as sexual or intimate roles?

Good point! I must agree. So, why couldn't he have the bottom role?

P.S. According to the so-called manga, if I'm a male participant of the lgbtq+ community and I'm short, I guess that means I'm automatically "weak, overly effeminate, overly sensitive and a bottom who belongs to the top!" REALLY!! LFMFAO!!!!

LMFAO!!!

P.S. IMO, a "winning situation" is breaking free from an outdated, stereotypical, trope-filled past.

True. You're absolutely correct. But production companies are constantly making changes to source material. I also realize that they're playing to the fantasy fanservice that made the manga popular in the first place. However, forward thinking production companies should know that there's also money in keeping up with the times.

I'm going to skip this series. I'm so tired of the "tall masculine top" over the "shorter seemingly weaker bottom" scenario. These writers and production companies just don't get that "tall" men can be just as "vulnerable, sensitive, and even weak" as "short" men. Likewise, "short" men can be just as "strong, virile, and dominating" as a tall man. Height continues to "dominate" who's "dominant!" That's just so 10-20 years ago of outdated thinking and so WeTV.

You know! You're right! Good observation.