This review may contain spoilers
The ending of The King of Pigs is bleak, heavy, and deliberately uncomfortable
The ending of The King of Pigs is bleak, heavy, and deliberately uncomfortable—very much in line with the drama’s core themes of school violence, trauma, and revenge.
In the final episodes, the story makes it painfully clear that there are no real winners. Kyung-min’s descent into violence reaches its tragic conclusion, showing how years of untreated trauma and silence can twist a victim into becoming a perpetrator. His death (and the way it happens) feels less like justice and more like an inevitable collapse—one that could have been avoided if help had come earlier.
Jong-seok’s arc is equally heartbreaking. As a detective, he represents the possibility of intervention, but as a former bystander, he is haunted by guilt. The ending forces him—and the viewer—to confront the idea that doing nothing is also a form of violence. His survival is not comforting; it’s a punishment, leaving him to live with regret and responsibility.
What makes the ending powerful is its refusal to offer catharsis. The bullies are exposed, but that exposure does not heal the damage already done. The trauma lingers, reinforcing the drama’s message that violence leaves permanent scars, especially when inflicted during childhood.
Overall, the ending of The King of Pigs is tragic but thematically honest. It doesn’t aim to satisfy—it aims to warn. It leaves viewers disturbed, reflective, and aware that ignoring cruelty only allows it to grow, often with devastating consequences.
In the final episodes, the story makes it painfully clear that there are no real winners. Kyung-min’s descent into violence reaches its tragic conclusion, showing how years of untreated trauma and silence can twist a victim into becoming a perpetrator. His death (and the way it happens) feels less like justice and more like an inevitable collapse—one that could have been avoided if help had come earlier.
Jong-seok’s arc is equally heartbreaking. As a detective, he represents the possibility of intervention, but as a former bystander, he is haunted by guilt. The ending forces him—and the viewer—to confront the idea that doing nothing is also a form of violence. His survival is not comforting; it’s a punishment, leaving him to live with regret and responsibility.
What makes the ending powerful is its refusal to offer catharsis. The bullies are exposed, but that exposure does not heal the damage already done. The trauma lingers, reinforcing the drama’s message that violence leaves permanent scars, especially when inflicted during childhood.
Overall, the ending of The King of Pigs is tragic but thematically honest. It doesn’t aim to satisfy—it aims to warn. It leaves viewers disturbed, reflective, and aware that ignoring cruelty only allows it to grow, often with devastating consequences.
Was this review helpful to you?
