lime_pickle

Lee Jee Hoon is the dog's bollocks (no offence). He's good in everything he's in and (most of) what he's in is good. See also Shin Hye Sun.

The headline is the usual pidgin from this 'writer' who just plagiarises Soompi (or other) articles but adds some poor grammar/missing words for shits and giggles. I assume the sentence should end 'writer' or maybe director. Here's the original: https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/ji-chang-wook-and-shin-hye-sun-in-talks-for-when-the-camellia-blooms-director-and-go-back-couple-writers-next-1207958

The Beauty Inside? Where each day he wakes up in a different body?

So? Get some therapy.

Unless you're invited - because you're friends or family - you can't, you freak.

Of course the 2 (and counting) boyfriends she 'borrowed' money from might be minors, too. Nobody comes out of this looking good.

I agree, she's a saggy, hysterical drunk (the character, not the actress) who in many scenes looks like his Mum. But I can see how this would appeal to middle-aged women (fnar, fnar). And zero chemistry.

This was a fun watch but I'll forget it in a fortnight. I think I need more of a plot to really get invested.

It has.

Not all the MDL 'writers' are as bad as this one, who regularly regurgiates Soompi articles with added bad grammar and incomprehension.

We don't know the age of the boyfriend(s) either. Both could be just as young. I wouldn't base my assessment on that.

It may or might not be broadcast in your territory concurrently. Disney+ regularly buys up the international streaming platform rights for big K dramas and then only makes them accessible (immediately, or at all) in a tiny handful of territories.

In the - badly plagiarised from a Soompi original - article it did seem as if it was saying that the boyfriend's parents were 'abusive' but the corrected version makes it clear that the allegation is about hers. I've not seen anything to suggest the sequence of boyfriends she 'borrowed' money from were abusive.

In the - badly plagiarised from a Soompi original - article it did seem as if it was saying that the boyfriend's parents were 'abusive' but the corrected version makes it clear that the allegation is about hers. I've not seen anything to suggest the sequence of boyfriends she 'borrowed' money from were abusive.

It's underrated, I suspect, because it doesn't check the 'cheesy romance' box.

I hope one of the streaming platforms picks this up. The cast is stacked and the real-life story very moving: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_Prince_Sohyeon

She starts off as the fiancee of the 2ML, but while he saw (and liked) her I don't think she knew him from a bar of soap.

It appears to have been plagiarised - which MDL does regularly - from a slightly more coherent (but still pointless) Soompi article.

The article is totally nonsensical. He lent her money so she could move away from HIS abusive parents? Why was she living with them in the first place, rather than her own?

Another word salad 'synopsis'. Seriously, does nobody at MDL ever proofread these things? For example:

"Kang Young Hwa is Han Ri Ta’s reincarnation. She is a 24-years-old university student. The girl has a one-sided love for Han Min Oh since high school."

Then, later on:

"Han Min Oh is the 6 years older brother of Han Jun Oh and he is having a one-sided love on Kang Young Hwa. "

So who is macking onto whom? If they both have a 'one-sided' love for each other it isn't one-sided is it?