I can't get myself to finish Hwarang. Eye-candy cast or not..that storyline makes me want to yeet myself off the window given its lowkey incestuous dialogues and disappointing acting as of the 10 episodes i've seen ; - ;
I've seen Pinocchio but the rest I still haven't touched on there oop (they're on my list tho, so i'll eventually get to them)
I- ; -; i only recently found out about him and his acting this is devastating. i hope he is in a better place. he was a wonderful actor and will be forever remembered
i'm going to be so conflicted when It's Okay To Not Be Okay gets on that list and I have to decide whether I keep Hospital Playlist on the top for me or not alkdjaslkjdaslkslksjdkasljdalk
Anyways, anyone who liked the untamed. The same author who wrote that, also wrote heavens official blessings and…
did you bother reading the end points? -----go scroll up if you haven't please. “Rabid fangirl” isn’t meant to be an insult and isn’t referring to the fanbase as a whole, just a few fans who are rather aggressive (quoted from the article)
I feel like you've misunderstood what is said. They aren't saying anything about two attractive male leads automatically…
Listen. Please read carefully to fully understand what they're saying cuz you're taking it way out of context. I get why you would be upset, but that doesn't mean you twist tiny sentences from the entirety of the article that expresses its just an observation to make it seem like the author is being homophobic and belittling dramas.
1. Suggesting an additional factor to their fame.
"As I began watching The Untamed, I noted the marketing and psychological strategies behind the drama. While The Untamed is an amazing show with a heart-wrenching storyline, strong character development, and unforgettable friendship, I personally believe that, in addition to these features, another aspect of the show has fueled its rise to the top."
IN ADDITION TO THESE FEATURES. They aren't saying the main reason the drama is popular is the actors, they're saying it is an additional factor on top of what is already great about it.
2. The "BoyBand Effect" is just ONE OF MANY marketing strategies idol companies use to promote their groups. Nowhere do I see them claiming that it is all k-pop fans or limited to k-pop fans behaving this way, rather they use BTS and GOT7 as examples of groups that have given a lot of fanservice with Vlives, videos, selfies etc that its almost like a sense of "dating". They aren't belittling kpop fans in any way, but suggesting an effect this strategy has on fans - doesn't mean it does.
3. "Fangirls have all the boys to themselves." You're not getting the point in the sentence and figure of speech here - they're saying that with the large variety of side characters, fangirls have characters they can love, a bias of sorts. Having a character all to yourself does not mean they are dating them.
They're suggesting that just as much our single boyband idols are "all to ourselves" to fangirl over, the same style of effect is given by the big attractive male cast.
The entire article has been taken out of context, and misinterpreted to deem the author outdated and homophobic when clearly they haven't intended to do so at all.
Now if even after clearing up this misunderstanding you're still not going to see what I mean then all I can say is you're being really close-minded here.
I'm defending because words are being taken out of context and used for attacking over the wrong things. Also this article has nothing to do with "wanting to date two guys in a relationship" if you've bothered understanding what is going on. *sigh*
So it’s a boy band effect because they are no female leads and their hot guys. So every other BL drama which…
I feel like you've misunderstood what is said. They aren't saying anything about two attractive male leads automatically mean boyband effect.
They're suggesting a boyband effect based on the big cast- quote: "This show has an exceptionally large cast of hot, single guys – just like you would have in a boyband."
"However, in The Untamed, the audience isn’t the 3rd wheel of any character – they can be the love interest of every character." doesn't imply they can't ship two males/females. they can ship if they'd like, they can fall for the character if they like.
I also don't think they're insulting k-pop, being a multi-stan myself. They're suggesting one of the tactics several idol companies use which ADDs to their fame, not necessarily being their reasons for fame. Do realize that while one group of peeps love BTS for their music and personalities, there are several out there who find their looks as a bigger factor for liking them = doesn't mean it is always the case.
It is just one of their marketing strategies, there is no conclusion that it is the entirety of their reasons for fame.
"The “Boyband Effect” is a vital marketing strategy for companies. The fangirls can have a “boyfriend” without connecting with the people around them —all they have to do is watch millions of YouTube videos and V Live streams, repost every picture, and spend the majority of their time with the boys."
Stress on the fact they said "CAN have a 'boyfriend'" so it is a choice.
So claiming the article is borderline homophobic seems a tad too assuming given their points have been misinterpreted or taken out of context.
I have a feeling that when a kdrama becomes famous (historical, romcom or any genre), users do not ask so many…
I feel like I'd disagree there to extents. Dramas can be well written and well done but not receive as much attention or success as another drama whether it be Cdramas or Kdramas. Now as per my experiences I get recommended Untamed because of the actors and the BL plot-line, and I'm not denying the drama has great story and acting . But there obviously has to be added factors to UT that bring it more popularity than other dramas with just as much good a story & production than others.
You can't say well-written and well-produced are the sole reason this drama is doing well, because if that were the case, there would be tons of dramas doing just as amazing and I'd like to know why Chicago Typewriter is so underrated.
Which is where you have to consider the fact that them adapting it from a very popular BL novel and the attractive cast might (stress on the word MIGHT) have been the boost to their ratings on top of good story and acting.
Just a reminder to people who are aggressively accusing the author or considering being aggressive to them for belittling this drama to just looks and possibly missed parts of it:
They've stated that it might have been a boost (not calling it truth/fact), and has not denied that it has amazing chemistry and story-line. They aren't claiming this is the only reason its popular. (some comments clearly seemed to have missed those sentences in there - consider rereading)
They're just suggesting an effect that they have linked as per patterns, and that's okay. Don't see a need for people to attack when the article clearly is just sharing their viewpoint - or at least when you attack, know what is written on there and consider being respectful please ^^
Ur comment saved me from going deeper into the comments section, thank you.
np!!! had this happen way too many times, so ye...no need to scroll down all I see is negativity > ~< if you feel attracted by the synopsis or actors give it a go and decide for yourself : D
nah same. felt it was a tad bit overrated given its hype. a lovely concept with amazing visuals both actors & set wise. but story wise i don't see how its at that high a score ig??? (but thats just my personal viewpoint ig)
It was not necessary killing seung jun Character I didn’t like that
ye it felt too sudden and didn't really build up as much as I wanted to. we only ever got enough time & chemistry with duo in a few episodes and suddenly killing him off just felt wrong. 1. i just didn't know how to feel because it felt off and wrong to just happen like that near the end 2. i cried yet couldn't feel as sad as i would say if it was one of the peeps from the main duo. the buildup of feelins didn't exist
I've seen Pinocchio but the rest I still haven't touched on there oop (they're on my list tho, so i'll eventually get to them)
; -; i only recently found out about him and his acting this is devastating. i hope he is in a better place. he was a wonderful actor and will be forever remembered
-----go scroll up if you haven't please.
“Rabid fangirl” isn’t meant to be an insult and isn’t referring to the fanbase as a whole, just a few fans who are rather aggressive
(quoted from the article)
1. Suggesting an additional factor to their fame.
"As I began watching The Untamed, I noted the marketing and psychological strategies behind the drama. While The Untamed is an amazing show with a heart-wrenching storyline, strong character development, and unforgettable friendship, I personally believe that, in addition to these features, another aspect of the show has fueled its rise to the top."
IN ADDITION TO THESE FEATURES. They aren't saying the main reason the drama is popular is the actors, they're saying it is an additional factor on top of what is already great about it.
2. The "BoyBand Effect" is just ONE OF MANY marketing strategies idol companies use to promote their groups. Nowhere do I see them claiming that it is all k-pop fans or limited to k-pop fans behaving this way, rather they use BTS and GOT7 as examples of groups that have given a lot of fanservice with Vlives, videos, selfies etc that its almost like a sense of "dating".
They aren't belittling kpop fans in any way, but suggesting an effect this strategy has on fans - doesn't mean it does.
3. "Fangirls have all the boys to themselves." You're not getting the point in the sentence and figure of speech here - they're saying that with the large variety of side characters, fangirls have characters they can love, a bias of sorts. Having a character all to yourself does not mean they are dating them.
They're suggesting that just as much our single boyband idols are "all to ourselves" to fangirl over, the same style of effect is given by the big attractive male cast.
The entire article has been taken out of context, and misinterpreted to deem the author outdated and homophobic when clearly they haven't intended to do so at all.
Now if even after clearing up this misunderstanding you're still not going to see what I mean then all I can say is you're being really close-minded here.
I'm defending because words are being taken out of context and used for attacking over the wrong things. Also this article has nothing to do with "wanting to date two guys in a relationship" if you've bothered understanding what is going on. *sigh*
They're suggesting a boyband effect based on the big cast- quote:
"This show has an exceptionally large cast of hot, single guys – just like you would have in a boyband."
"However, in The Untamed, the audience isn’t the 3rd wheel of any character – they can be the love interest of every character."
doesn't imply they can't ship two males/females. they can ship if they'd like, they can fall for the character if they like.
I also don't think they're insulting k-pop, being a multi-stan myself. They're suggesting one of the tactics several idol companies use which ADDs to their fame, not necessarily being their reasons for fame. Do realize that while one group of peeps love BTS for their music and personalities, there are several out there who find their looks as a bigger factor for liking them = doesn't mean it is always the case.
It is just one of their marketing strategies, there is no conclusion that it is the entirety of their reasons for fame.
"The “Boyband Effect” is a vital marketing strategy for companies. The fangirls can have a “boyfriend” without connecting with the people around them —all they have to do is watch millions of YouTube videos and V Live streams, repost every picture, and spend the majority of their time with the boys."
Stress on the fact they said "CAN have a 'boyfriend'" so it is a choice.
So claiming the article is borderline homophobic seems a tad too assuming given their points have been misinterpreted or taken out of context.
Now as per my experiences I get recommended Untamed because of the actors and the BL plot-line, and I'm not denying the drama has great story and acting . But there obviously has to be added factors to UT that bring it more popularity than other dramas with just as much good a story & production than others.
You can't say well-written and well-produced are the sole reason this drama is doing well, because if that were the case, there would be tons of dramas doing just as amazing and I'd like to know why Chicago Typewriter is so underrated.
Which is where you have to consider the fact that them adapting it from a very popular BL novel and the attractive cast might (stress on the word MIGHT) have been the boost to their ratings on top of good story and acting.
They've stated that it might have been a boost (not calling it truth/fact), and has not denied that it has amazing chemistry and story-line. They aren't claiming this is the only reason its popular.
(some comments clearly seemed to have missed those sentences in there - consider rereading)
They're just suggesting an effect that they have linked as per patterns, and that's okay. Don't see a need for people to attack when the article clearly is just sharing their viewpoint - or at least when you attack, know what is written on there and consider being respectful please ^^
if you feel attracted by the synopsis or actors give it a go and decide for yourself : D
so much negativity oop