Quantcast

Details

  • Last Online: 5 days ago
  • Location:
  • Contribution Points: 0 LV0
  • Roles:
  • Join Date: December 16, 2021
  • Awards Received: Finger Heart Award1
Replying to honey_boo • Mar 25, 2024
the best review I've red so far for this kdrama bc people should talk more about how problematic and icky the…
The Jihan character makes watching this kdrama so uncomfortable for me. And, it's extra annoying because I loved Sangmin in his previous kdramas.

I means he's acting really well in wedding impossible too, but the character is just too unlikable
1 2
Replying to KD-Jen • Mar 24, 2024
I agree but I feel as though Ae Jeong is leading Ji Han on in some way, with being overly concerned about him.…
I mean he forces himself in her spaces, without him asking. She can't be leading someone on, when the person already follows her around obsessively.

People see jihan's attitude towards ahjung as romantic and caring, but I just generally see him as someone who can't mind his business. I just can't feel the romance I'm expected to see from their dynamic.
1 1
Replying to Tajia • Mar 5, 2024
How is it,can you summarize it?
It's not a bl novel. The main character has multiple partners across the time period of his life the book covers. It's very realistic. Not lovey dovey.

It reminds me of the vibe late 90s/early 2000s Asian queer movies had. I felt a very similar aura of the queer movie 'So long, See you tomorrow'.

It's emotional and beautiful, and romance isn't the focus.
6 1
Replying to reverie • Feb 26, 2024
FL's face look too sad for a romcom. But who hires a fake bff to pretend in front of her husband?
It's an actual service in Korea. People that don't have friends/family hire strangers to act like they are their loved ones.
2 0
Replying to ToMyStar • Feb 24, 2024
Na if you scroll down you can see that the romance is not between the 47 year old and 19 year old. But 19 year…
I had this issue with love for love's sake
0 0
Replying to PizzaIsLove • Feb 21, 2024
I didn't feel that Love for Love's Sake was "pedophilic" or "borderline pedophilic" A "pedophile" is sexually…
No in Korean age, he would be considered 18, and in the newly adapted international age he would be 16/17.

Korean high schooler seniors graduate highschool at 18(international age).

Either in the new international or Korean age, Cha seowon would still be considered a minor.
0 0
Replying to PizzaIsLove • Feb 21, 2024
I didn't feel that Love for Love's Sake was "pedophilic" or "borderline pedophilic" A "pedophile" is sexually…
He was 16/17, in international age, and 18/19 in korean age, because he was in a class below the other main character.

Since you're bringing up the Korean age system, The age of no more being a minor in Korea is 20 years old in Korean age, which has now recently been legally changed to the generally used international age, legally. Which means it is 18 now.


The age someone will be considered an adult is 18 years old. Cha seowon is 16/17 years old. He is still classified as a minor under the law.
0 2
Replying to PizzaIsLove • Feb 21, 2024
I didn't feel that Love for Love's Sake was "pedophilic" or "borderline pedophilic" A "pedophile" is sexually…
Wait I just remembered seowoon called him seonbae and was a class below him, which makes him a year younger than the age I thought he was, so the age gap is 11 years now
0 0
Replying to PizzaIsLove • Feb 21, 2024
I didn't feel that Love for Love's Sake was "pedophilic" or "borderline pedophilic" A "pedophile" is sexually…
Thanks for the correction, but as you said, it doesn't change anything. 10 year gap or 12 year gap, it's still a minor and a grown ass adult
0 1
Replying to PizzaIsLove • Feb 20, 2024
I didn't feel that Love for Love's Sake was "pedophilic" or "borderline pedophilic" A "pedophile" is sexually…
We just have to agree to disagree, just like you said. Fiction is fiction I get that, but it does mean I'll ever defend the problematic nature of the fictitious depictions, if they have a morality issue
0 1
Replying to PizzaIsLove • Feb 20, 2024
I didn't feel that Love for Love's Sake was "pedophilic" or "borderline pedophilic" A "pedophile" is sexually…
The relationship being a plot device doesn't make it any less problematic.
0 3
Replying to PizzaIsLove • Feb 20, 2024
I didn't feel that Love for Love's Sake was "pedophilic" or "borderline pedophilic" A "pedophile" is sexually…
I'm not going to discuss whether a minor is prepubescent or not. Any piece of media that needs that kind of further explanation of the blurred lines of the different categories of minors, is problematic.

An adult 29 year old dated a 17 year old.
0 13
On High School Return of a Gangster • Feb 15, 2024
I didn't side eye the querness erasure because I thought it was going to do what love for love sake did with the borderline pedophilic plot line of making the adult person go back to high school with their adult consciousness and be romantic with an actual highschool minded student.

But, since the romance would have been between the actual 18 year old and his friend, the erasure seems quite ignorant, especially since they had no issue casting a literal criminal in this kdrama
5 15
Replying to cortaditas • Feb 2, 2024
Person Oh Min Su
baby who are you talking to
It's giving "Hi I'm KJCTdramafan and you're watching Disney channel"
5 0
Replying to biniBningPunkista • Jan 29, 2024
I honestly felt the same way as you .. and episode 16 lacked so much on showing Moeun's character growth but...…
When he broke up with her, they both still loved each other so them getting back together just seems to me like they're picking up back where they stopped and trying to be together when Moeun most likely (since there is no actual clarification) might still feel they are incompatible. Like how could she date a deaf guy and get offended that he didn't hear her stomach grumble or that he didn't react to the music being turned off. Girlie needs to work on herself, or better still find someone who suits her dreams than date someone who clearly doesn't meet up, and get sad she can't mould him into her ideal partner.
7 5
On Pale Moon • Jan 29, 2024
Title Pale Moon
I thought it would go in the direction that lost did or maybe eve better, but it was a bit disappointing tbh
0 0
On Tell Me That You Love Me • Jan 28, 2024
If they broke up because she kept finding inadequacies in how he is in their relationship, what's the point of bringing them together again after she hurt him so much that he broke up with her? There is no clarification if she still feels the same and will keep pointing out 'faults' in a deaf man's existence. 'Faults' that will never change.

Episode 16 was unnecessary. Jinwoo deserves someone who won't make him feel like a burden to them. Towards the ending, I preferred he ended up with Seo kyung instead, (not like she's an ideal choice either). At least she showed growth and realized that he in fact was enough. She just never cared to notice. Moeun's character on the other hand was just shown 1 year later, after making Jinwoo feel insecure in his abilities as a partner, without any scene of her showing she accepts Jinwoo as he is with all his expected shortcomings that may not align with her dream relationship. The writers just put Jinwoo with her, when he might still experience the exact same thing again.

I wish Jinwoo found someone less problematic than Seokyung and Moeun. Someone who would appreciate him for him.
20 8
On Oh Jung Se • Jan 7, 2024
Person Oh Jung Se
His acting gagged me in 'Death's Game'. One of my favourite actors for a reason
7 0
On Sung Hoon • Nov 15, 2023
Person Sung Hoon
He reminds me of an older version of Kim jiwoong
3 0