Instead of directly copying the original skam version, i think the creators chose to draw loose inspiration from it, recognizing that skam wouldnt align well with Korean culture. It has nothing to do with removing the gay couple as i can see from various teasers that both gay and lesbian couples are included so the LGBTQ+ representation remains intact.
The original skam addresses issues that are relevant to western teenagers in school or college, which differ significantly from the challenges faced by asian students. For instance, one of the main characters in skam is muslim and the cultural and social issues she deals with are not as relevant in korea, where the muslim population is much smaller. This makes it difficult to include a muslim character in a korean adaptation. This is just one example, there are several other issues that western students encounter that korean teenagers may not relate to.
As a result, the korean creators are adapting skam in a way that resonates with their own audience. If they were to replicate skam with a completely western perspective, it would likely fail, much like how Hierarchy did.
When you watch too much p*rn and it rots your brain
What about kings or royals who engaged in sexual activities with maids or servants outside their marriages? They held respected and powerful positions, yet their behavior was just as morally questionable as that of sex workers. Isn’t that a valid comparison?
“People who expose themselves in front of a camera and engage in sexual acts for fame and money are slaves to their desires, and the same applies to those who watch them.” This also extends to those in power who fund such activities. Despite their high status, they lower themselves to these standards.
Do you like watching your parents have intercouse, after all that’s how you were brought into this world?
You def dont look normal healthy person, maybe watching po*n will make you healthy again.
I know you must havent got partner to fulfill your fantasies but atleast by watching po*n you can relieve yourself. Mayne thats what will make you normal again?
When you watch too much p*rn and it rots your brain
They didnt watch filth but to have you they themselves did some really nasty things. At that moment they were slaves to their own desires and according to your definition they are def rotten filthy people.
When you watch too much p*rn and it rots your brain
King who was slave to his own desires wasnt filthy rotten guy but only slaves who have no other option than to obey king's command forcefully are filthy people??
How does that make difference when both were engaged in sexual intercourse for their own pleasure??
If you want to put blame then it should be on both why only slaves??
You yourself said people who are slaves to their desires are filthyand king is exact definition of what you said, so how come he is not rotten/filthy.
It depends on how much costume ancient dramas you watch. I have watched a lot and this is just abt okayish
You may have problem with editing but i dont, it was very smooth experience for me. Its your probpem not mine.
I guess you have reading comphrension, i clearly said kingdom is superior to this one. I just gave example of another standout korean saguek which i personally liked, so i dont evn know where did i compared both of them??
1 
The original skam addresses issues that are relevant to western teenagers in school or college, which differ significantly from the challenges faced by asian students. For instance, one of the main characters in skam is muslim and the cultural and social issues she deals with are not as relevant in korea, where the muslim population is much smaller. This makes it difficult to include a muslim character in a korean adaptation. This is just one example, there are several other issues that western students encounter that korean teenagers may not relate to.
As a result, the korean creators are adapting skam in a way that resonates with their own audience. If they were to replicate skam with a completely western perspective, it would likely fail, much like how Hierarchy did.
“People who expose themselves in front of a camera and engage in sexual acts for fame and money are slaves to their desires, and the same applies to those who watch them.” This also extends to those in power who fund such activities. Despite their high status, they lower themselves to these standards.
I know you must havent got partner to fulfill your fantasies but atleast by watching po*n you can relieve yourself. Mayne thats what will make you normal again?
At that moment they were slaves to their own desires and according to your definition they are def rotten filthy people.
How does that make difference when both were engaged in sexual intercourse for their own pleasure??
If you want to put blame then it should be on both why only slaves??
You yourself said people who are slaves to their desires are filthyand king is exact definition of what you said, so how come he is not rotten/filthy.
Do u still live in 19th century or what??
(Yes i want to get turned on by me 🌚🌚)
I guess you have reading comphrension, i clearly said kingdom is superior to this one. I just gave example of another standout korean saguek which i personally liked, so i dont evn know where did i compared both of them??