She was cruel, dramatically it was intentional that you were not taken by her behaviour - therefore successful.…
Yes it is, I'm not writing an essay on it, I'm generalising. I meant all men in the drama, me and others who've said the same. She has an irresistible and charismatic charm, don't you think?
Maybe I missed sth but I don‘t quite get what they intended ML‘s image to be; on the one hand he‘s rumured…
Good comment. He's enigmatic. He lives under a shroud of mystery. A person where rumours and gossip follow him - we're learning what's true and what is not as it goes on.
Anyone else finds the female lead very obnoxious and annoying!?They could have picked a much more beautiful actress…
She was cruel, dramatically it was intentional that you were not taken by her behaviour - therefore successful. I find her look extremely pleasing, she's a natural - she looks good with or without makeup. She's a sweetheart, the type of girl all men are attracted to, she's cheeky, manipulative, clever, proud - we could see that her eyes and her words were at complete odds with one another, that's quality acting, she's magnificent. I believe we're going to see even more sides to her in the second half!
parody that isn't comedy is done now. Chad hero couldn't get the bed but can't live without one - to be a chad…
I take it English is not your first language. Just use Google translate so we can get what you're trying to say. If I understand correctly, you're declaring yourself to be a philistine (or barbarian, whichever you prefer). Some of the most renowned literary works such as Jane Austen are not dissimilar to what you complain about. In fact this drama reminds me a lot of the best romantic (classical definition) classics from all around the world. It's not trash, quite the opposite, it's overflowing in quality, richness and entertainment value, a visual delight, music to the ears, tonic for the heart.
I don't know abt anything else, but I definitely don't see him winning in that battle unless someone intervenes…
Absolutely, it's clear Jang Hyuk prefers maidens, one in particular. The distorted minds of the lovelorn. It just felt like that moment was the catalyst for what's about to come.
So we saw Gil Chae rise. Her crucial life decision was fully influenced by the obsessive Ryang Eum, if it was a modern drama he'd be stealing the phone and deleting messages to ward off his love rival. I can see what's coming, the only negative aspect of My Dearest was the opening sequence spoiler. Anyone know why they do that?
Just believe your own opinions when you watch it. If people put buzzwords in their reviews they're just trying…
It makes no difference, according to the specification given above, it fails, the answer's "no" whatever you suggest. I find it helps if you read the comment properly.
Just believe your own opinions when you watch it. If people put buzzwords in their reviews they're just trying…
I just read the synopsis. The answer must match this rebuttal by moonlight:
"Tropes = repetitive plot devices/ character types/ themes/events that have appeared in countless dramas & movies before, so they make the story predictable, cliché, unoriginal and cheap. Well-written high quality stories don't have tropes."
It's called painting yourself into a corner - declaring an exclusive specification so arbitrary that nothing can be proven to match it. The buzzwords all sounded good, but when they had to back them up with real meaning, they found it to be impossible.
I find her look extremely pleasing, she's a natural - she looks good with or without makeup. She's a sweetheart, the type of girl all men are attracted to, she's cheeky, manipulative, clever, proud - we could see that her eyes and her words were at complete odds with one another, that's quality acting, she's magnificent. I believe we're going to see even more sides to her in the second half!
Some of the most renowned literary works such as Jane Austen are not dissimilar to what you complain about. In fact this drama reminds me a lot of the best romantic (classical definition) classics from all around the world. It's not trash, quite the opposite, it's overflowing in quality, richness and entertainment value, a visual delight, music to the ears, tonic for the heart.
What a story!
"Tropes = repetitive plot devices/ character types/ themes/events that have appeared in countless dramas & movies before, so they make the story predictable, cliché, unoriginal and cheap. Well-written high quality stories don't have tropes."
It's called painting yourself into a corner - declaring an exclusive specification so arbitrary that nothing can be proven to match it. The buzzwords all sounded good, but when they had to back them up with real meaning, they found it to be impossible.