atom951

Netflix is delivering a 16 part drama, I'm feeling optimistic. I love Lee Ji-eun too, don't listen to those Yoon supporters IU, you rock 🫰
(Please be a good drama 😬)

It was a rhetorical scenario, obviously. Everyone knows the outcome.

There you go, what's with you and comparing disparate crimes? If I lived in the middle east I'd abide by the law, I respect the laws in each country, whatever they are, and would never assume my own culture was superior, your hubris is notable.

Because artists respect other artists. That's how I know.

Right, it's your choice, don't watch, don't tell others what they can watch.

The cast seems to be full of smart people with a sense of humour, people that naturally make me smile - hope it lands on a decent OTT!

Ha, I was sticking a knife in. Emily Blunt is carrying the flag for beauty and wit. On the other hand, there's a French film called Under Paris that kind of triggered my comment - a woke film that's gone out of its way to homogenise gender, femininity in particular... how did the elegant France lose sight of beauty to the extent of persecution of the beauty. It was a hilarious film btw, unintentionally.

I believe in the law and facts. Why are you obsessed with SA when it's not the topic at hand? Let's discuss when the time comes, it makes no sense to pick a random, egregious crime scenario as an argument for condoning a disparate crime.

This is where you said it:
"if he hasn't harmed anyone then what do I care"
Crime harms somebody, somewhere, even though you can't see it.

How about a citizen swap scheme, the US can have Ah-in and SK can have a US addict in return. Which do you think would rehabilitate and which would reoffend?

How do you know who he's harmed? It's fine as long as you're not the one affected? With that attitude to the law, you will be affected, when it's ok for someone far away, it reaches your doorstep eventually, without obstruction. And don't you find it dishonourable to condone crime, just as a matter of principle?

You seem to be a strong proponent of justice. Except for Yoo Ah-in. And people falsely accused of something - those are guilty and should be stoned. You're a proponent of virtue signalling, you pick and choose crimes which you think are cool and those which are egregious. Your ignorance disgusts me. All crime is shameful. All crime hurts people - but it's ok when it's not you I guess.

Do you understand the concept of drama? Or should drama only contain scenes that meet the virtue signallers' handbook of mock outrage? You sound brainwashed, you should write and produce your own drama, you'd win the prize of Most Boring Fuck Of The Year.

Photo 3 sucks, so old fashioned. Like a K-pop band from 15 years ago

Don't tell me.... Je Hoon gets tired of negotiating and kick boxes the the subject into submission?

Shut up, write and produce your own dramas if you don't like it.

Wouldn't that be convenient for your little virtue signalling scenario. You set quite a low bar, are you living in a ditch, are you a guttersnipe maybe?

Ha ha. That's bullshit. Social media comments are reflective of what exactly? Don't live in a social media bubble, when you come out, the real world is not the same. Look at those idiots on the left in the US who couldn't believe the real world was not the way they thought.

Netflix already committed to $2bn in South Korea over the next 4 years, or something along those lines. They'd lose it if they break the terms.

A case of over egging the pudding *, more than once. It could have been great with a little subtlety. Instead we got over the top re-editing, trying to salvage something off the cutting room floor. Here's what I think was originally shot - and if it wasn't, they missed an opportunity:

A mysterious nanny appears, two men become besotted and a sordid affair begins - even more shocking to reveal the nanny is a man in drag, it was a homosexual love triangle. Of course the wife would react with horror.

As for what was shown, it made little sense, I feel betrayed at being strung along by an accidentally surreal cacophony of sequences in the final third of the finale.

No idea what happened to the children either, they all forgot they had kids.

Ridiculous.

* The painting scene would have been splendid if it had ended sooner, they really killed the idea, like a comedian spending 10 minutes explaining his own joke.