Hello! A quick note for anyone who may have blocked me:
If you've chosen to block my account, I completely respect your decision. However, I would kindly ask that you avoid tagging my username in your replies. This generates email notifications for responses I’m unable to view.
Instead, if you'd like to share your thoughts or answer questions for others’ benefit, consider starting your own thread. This ensures your insights are visible to those who can engage with them.
The general consensus is that he faked it. He couldn't really remember her but faked it.
I actually asked the same question. How is that different from being forced to live? If we say Hyunmin was forced to live, what about the daughter? Wasn't she forced too?
Jiyoung killed herself, in Asian folklore, the punishment includes your love ones forgetting you. So Hyunmin was…
So, in Asian folklore, how does he remember when it's a curse that he can't remember and that she can't be remembered? I'm just curious. I've watched some Thai dramas on this subject, as ghosts and ghost stories/spirits seem to be their favorite subject as well.
Yeah, plus criticism if done, should be done correctly. Constructive criticism should always be there. If one…
So funny? Who cares if you don't engage? Do you honestly think, I'm sitting here waiting for your replies?.
I was just referring to your hypocritical stance and selective application of "respectful critique". It only extends to when we agree with each other. Not new to MDL, I'm used to all the crazy that happens here.
Have a pleasant day, having "respectful critique" with others.
Yeah, plus criticism if done, should be done correctly. Constructive criticism should always be there. If one…
respect can be subjective and influenced by personal values, tone, and context. The ‘standard’ for respectful critique isn't set in stone—it's more about a mutual understanding of civility, logic, and clarity. Constructive feedback focuses on the content, not personal attacks or dismissive language.
If you're all ears for respectful critique, perhaps consider that dismissing others as ‘stupid’ or ‘skipper watchers’ might not meet the very standard you're advocating. Respect goes both ways, even when we disagree."
This is not true because not everyone has the same standard results. The daughter was literally forced by her…
Choosing peace of mind and focusing on what you enjoy is completely valid. However, leaving constructive criticism or ‘bad reviews’ can also be important. Thoughtful feedback helps creators understand what worked and what didn’t, enabling growth and improvement in their craft. It’s not about perfection, but about fostering dialogue and accountability, which can elevate storytelling over time.
That said, it’s entirely up to the individual whether they want to engage critically or simply enjoy the work. Both approaches have value. However, my brain is wired to Critically engage with content so, I will always have questions and deep analysis of stuff. I don't believe in agreeing with people, I'm happy with forming my own opinions. Sometimes I agree sometimes I don't. Wishing you peace and happy watching—goodbye!"
Yeah, plus criticism if done, should be done correctly. Constructive criticism should always be there. If one…
Who sets the standard for respectful critique? How do you know it's respectful critique. You are not saying anything, this is not North Korea where there is censorship.
I've been on here for long enough to know how people don't like others to express their different opinion. You have to agree that boring shows are a "masterpiece" because some Oppa deluded Koreaboos can be happy.
This is not true because not everyone has the same standard results. The daughter was literally forced by her…
The problem is we have different ways of seeing and understanding film. Do you even know what a plot hole means?
A plot hole is an inconsistency, gap, or error in a story’s narrative that contradicts the logic or established facts of the plot. It often occurs when events, character actions, or outcomes don’t align with the story’s internal rules, previously established information, or reality. Plot holes can break the audience's suspension of disbelief because they leave questions unanswered or unresolved.
It doesn't mean that they have to explain everything. The fact that most people find the Hyunmin storytelling confusing says something about how the writer tied the loose ends.
He most likely faked it. He wasn't surprised when his girlfriend started talking. He also didn't really hesitate…
All I can say is there is usually general consensus if a drama is good, even people that are not fans of a genre or a writer will agree with the mastery of the drama.
If you're only getting people that like the author or genre then no the writer failed somewhere.
He most likely faked it. He wasn't surprised when his girlfriend started talking. He also didn't really hesitate…
According to you it's the best you have seen. You can go online to check other reviews. There is a reason why the drama is getting those reviews. Ratings on other platforms range btwn 7- 7.5 ( not this blind praise on MDL)
Stop trying to make it a me issue.... Here is one review I just read from another newspaper
"Mawkish supernatural story of two halves. Despite some clever subterfuge on the part of its creator Kang Full, and some affecting scenes, the show’s narrative lacks proper exposition."
This was a review by a movie critics, so stop this weird narrative about all dramas not having plot holes.
Frankly speaking, they are just simply stupid or just a skip watcher. That's all I can say.
Dismissing others as 'stupid' or 'skipper watchers' just because they don’t share your opinion seems like an oversimplification. Not everyone has to see the narrative the way you do—some people prefer critical thinking over blind praise.
Well, they had two options to focus, and they focused on their keyboard...
People who don't agree with a narrative are often labeled as haters due to a mix of emotional, social, and psychological factors:
1. Defensiveness: When someone challenges a widely accepted narrative, those who support it may feel personally attacked or defensive. Labeling the dissenters as "haters" dismisses their arguments without engaging with them.
2. Simplification: It’s easier to label someone as a "hater" than to unpack their criticism. This oversimplifies the disagreement and avoids deeper conversations or scrutiny.
3. Emotional Bias: People often connect emotionally to ideas, beliefs, or narratives. When someone disagrees, it can feel like an attack on their identity, leading to a negative, emotional response, such as calling them "haters."
4. Group Mentality: In-group/out-group dynamics play a role. Those who disagree may be perceived as "outsiders" or antagonists, leading to dismissive labels like "haters" to reinforce group cohesion and unity.
5. Misinterpretation of Criticism: Constructive criticism or a difference in perspective is sometimes misunderstood as negativity or hostility. The term "hater" generalizes all disagreement as malicious or unfounded.
6. Social Media Influence: Online platforms amplify this labeling because nuanced discussions often get replaced by quick, emotionally charged reactions. Calling someone a "hater" can shut down debate and attract support from like-minded individuals.
Ultimately, labeling someone as a "hater" is often a defense mechanism that avoids engaging with differing viewpoints or critical feedback. It simplifies complex disagreements into black-and-white terms, which can hinder open dialogue and understanding.
can I get an explanation why?? everyone is talking about moving 2??? someone explain..I have watched till 6pii
Well it's mainly because the body of work belongs to the same writer (Kang Full) . So they maybe they thought a Marvel Cinematic Universe thing is fun. Or maybe the stories are connected or not connected. Remains to be seen.
The general consensus is that he faked it. He couldn't really remember her but faked it.
I agree since the show also involves a bit of world building and it's really not clear what the rules are for this "world" because everyone seems to have a different outcome and even some of the "established" rules doesn't seem to apply to others.
it's also a w cuz I know now that park jeong min is young tak. I love park jeong min, I love KBS. I love hee joo.…
Just because you explained something to someone with a "running theory" doesn't mean you have really answered the question.
Some of the explanations create more questions than answers so don't expect people to just agree with you and feel they are being combative because your explanation is not good enough.
Or maybe it's the intention of the writer to leave you with questions. It could also be a writing style.
The general consensus is that he faked it. He couldn't really remember her but faked it.
The idea of not remembering is coming out of Korean tradition or some other Asian cultures believes that if you suicide you won't see or remember your loved ones. So it's not coming directly from the show/manhwa. It's a running theory.
I would have thought maybe the number of times the ghost resuitated him or forced him to live by starting his heart has something to do with it.
This is not true because not everyone has the same standard results. The daughter was literally forced by her…
If you say? "running theory" then it's something not expressly shown or highlighted in the show. It's a theory you came up to explain something. Don't be made even that "theory" doesn't make sense to others.
My problem is people here treating me like I'm crazy coz I don't buy into their theories.
The only thing that seems uniform is that there is no uniformity in this world. Different answers/solutions for different patients/peopl e.
Hello! A quick note for anyone who may have blocked me:
If you've chosen to block my account, I completely respect your decision. However, I would kindly ask that you avoid tagging my username in your replies. This generates email notifications for responses I’m unable to view.
Instead, if you'd like to share your thoughts or answer questions for others’ benefit, consider starting your own thread. This ensures your insights are visible to those who can engage with them.
Thank you for your cooperation and understanding!
I was just referring to your hypocritical stance and selective application of "respectful critique". It only extends to when we agree with each other. Not new to MDL, I'm used to all the crazy that happens here.
Have a pleasant day, having "respectful critique" with others.
If you're all ears for respectful critique, perhaps consider that dismissing others as ‘stupid’ or ‘skipper watchers’ might not meet the very standard you're advocating. Respect goes both ways, even when we disagree."
That said, it’s entirely up to the individual whether they want to engage critically or simply enjoy the work. Both approaches have value.
However, my brain is wired to Critically engage with content so, I will always have questions and deep analysis of stuff. I don't believe in agreeing with people, I'm happy with forming my own opinions. Sometimes I agree sometimes I don't.
Wishing you peace and happy watching—goodbye!"
I've been on here for long enough to know how people don't like others to express their different opinion. You have to agree that boring shows are a "masterpiece" because some Oppa deluded Koreaboos can be happy.
I'm not here to make you happy.
A plot hole is an inconsistency, gap, or error in a story’s narrative that contradicts the logic or established facts of the plot. It often occurs when events, character actions, or outcomes don’t align with the story’s internal rules, previously established information, or reality. Plot holes can break the audience's suspension of disbelief because they leave questions unanswered or unresolved.
It doesn't mean that they have to explain everything. The fact that most people find the Hyunmin storytelling confusing says something about how the writer tied the loose ends.
If you're only getting people that like the author or genre then no the writer failed somewhere.
Stop trying to make it a me issue.... Here is one review I just read from another newspaper
"Mawkish supernatural story of two halves. Despite some clever subterfuge on the part of its creator Kang Full, and some affecting scenes, the show’s narrative lacks proper exposition."
This was a review by a movie critics, so stop this weird narrative about all dramas not having plot holes.
1. Defensiveness:
When someone challenges a widely accepted narrative, those who support it may feel personally attacked or defensive. Labeling the dissenters as "haters" dismisses their arguments without engaging with them.
2. Simplification:
It’s easier to label someone as a "hater" than to unpack their criticism. This oversimplifies the disagreement and avoids deeper conversations or scrutiny.
3. Emotional Bias:
People often connect emotionally to ideas, beliefs, or narratives. When someone disagrees, it can feel like an attack on their identity, leading to a negative, emotional response, such as calling them "haters."
4. Group Mentality:
In-group/out-group dynamics play a role. Those who disagree may be perceived as "outsiders" or antagonists, leading to dismissive labels like "haters" to reinforce group cohesion and unity.
5. Misinterpretation of Criticism:
Constructive criticism or a difference in perspective is sometimes misunderstood as negativity or hostility. The term "hater" generalizes all disagreement as malicious or unfounded.
6. Social Media Influence:
Online platforms amplify this labeling because nuanced discussions often get replaced by quick, emotionally charged reactions. Calling someone a "hater" can shut down debate and attract support from like-minded individuals.
Ultimately, labeling someone as a "hater" is often a defense mechanism that avoids engaging with differing viewpoints or critical feedback. It simplifies complex disagreements into black-and-white terms, which can hinder open dialogue and understanding.
Some of the explanations create more questions than answers so don't expect people to just agree with you and feel they are being combative because your explanation is not good enough.
Or maybe it's the intention of the writer to leave you with questions. It could also be a writing style.
I would have thought maybe the number of times the ghost resuitated him or forced him to live by starting his heart has something to do with it.
But it also raises alot of questions for me.
My problem is people here treating me like I'm crazy coz I don't buy into their theories.
The only thing that seems uniform is that there is no uniformity in this world. Different answers/solutions for different patients/peopl
e.