WOW.. amazing talent..You basically insulted the same woman (as cheaply as i could not even imagine), while using…
You probably need to take that pill because it took you 12 days to come up with this reply ( really haha). So much for common intelligence , you simply repeat yourself like a broken record.Saying nothing but showing your otherwise dumbo logic. I'm so disappointed at both your basic and superior logic.
It's better to be stupid like me, than come up with nothing while pretending to use a so-called brain.
things that i would have loved to be discussed.1..FL's relationship with her mum and dad. Does amnesia mean that…
Amnesia doesn't change someone's character and she was pretty ambitious before as a teenager. More ambitious than the guy actually. So turning her into a docile, weak person seemed like just an overused plot device. I would have liked to see her still have dreams, even if they were different dreams but she was stuck with middle-aged men working as a taxi- driver and just miserable until the guy showed up. Which is not true or realistic.
The writer made it seem like her dreams were linked to her memory which is not true. She spoke up against her mother-in-law and got a divorce. That shows she had some spirit or spunk in her. She was actually stronger than her mum as well, so I don't get it at the end of the day. The writer tried very hard to keep the FL both infantile, innocent and stupid which contradicts with her earlier life and character and the story itself.
It's high time that script writers write better female characters, not victims of circumstances or plot devices.
“The men are always the innocent ones, whereas the ex's that are women are super vindictive” I’m sorry,…
Let me help you....The argument you presented contains several elements that can be identified as problematic. Let's break it down:
Personal attacks: The statement "given your level of stupidity" is a personal attack and does not contribute to a productive discussion. Engaging in ad hominem attacks undermines the quality of the argument and distracts from the main points being made.
Mischaracterization of the opposing position: You claim that my position is "neither objective nor based on anything except because you want to beat your anti-men agenda." However, you provide no evidence or specific examples to support this assertion. It is important to address the specific arguments and evidence put forth by the other person rather than making generalized accusations.
Ad hominem accusation: You argue that my position is based solely on their "hatred for men." However, without examining the specific arguments and evidence presented by the other person, it is unfair and unjustified to assume that my position is motivated by personal bias.
Lack of evidence: You assert that my position is not based on anything substantial, but you fail to provide any evidence or reasoning to support this claim. It is essential to present concrete evidence, logical reasoning, or reliable sources (not Dispatch) to support your assertions and engage in a constructive debate.
Inconsistency in blame game accusation: You accuse me of starting a blame game while simultaneously asserting that they are doing the very thing they accused others of. This creates confusion and undermines the coherence of your argument.
WOW.. amazing talent..You basically insulted the same woman (as cheaply as i could not even imagine), while using…
Apply some of that genius reasoning and logic to your own argument and stop generalizing and putting words into my mouth. I believe her version of events and not because she is a woman. Nowhere did i say i hate men, I'm surprised an intelligent person like you made that conclusion based on some assumption that if you don't believe KSH or Dispatch then you hate men. (Hahaha)
You are the one that needs to grow-up and stop the "ad hominem" pseudo-logical reasoning. Your rhetorical strategy where you attack the character, motive, and other attributes of the people who have a different opinion from you rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself is laughable and shows whose really dumb at the end of the day.Name calling, illogical arguments, assumptions and you call other people dumb. (Really)
“The men are always the innocent ones, whereas the ex's that are women are super vindictive” I’m sorry,…
Einstein, you talk about logic but use a "ad hominem" logical fallacy to try and prove nothing. By the way i already have an opinion and i don't need your approval or permission to have it. Extend the courtesy to someone that actually cares about your opinion because i don't.
Objective view over what? KSH already admitted to the relationship and baby so whats there to be objective about.Love or Hate his ex-girlfriend that doesn't make him innocent or change the facts.
WOW.. amazing talent..You basically insulted the same woman (as cheaply as i could not even imagine), while using…
I love it when unintelligent people (haha) try using pseudo-logic while still saying nonsensical things. Are you really going to try and police my thoughts and opinions (which you are not privy to) on a public forum.
Better if you spend your time forming coherent sentences and arguments.
This kind of article should be stopped, why highlighting age is an important thing to reason the drama success?…
I disagree, i think its a very important aspect to highlight especially when it comes to the kdrama industry which seems obsessed with youth and youth-centric stories.You rarely see older women being FL leads, besides playing mother-in-laws and grannies or just ajummas with no ambitions in life. There is hesitation when a drama is being headlined by older actors, unlike the young actors. Its like you are forgotten after a certain age, which i find very sad for talented actresses.
“The men are always the innocent ones, whereas the ex's that are women are super vindictive” I’m sorry,…
Imagine speaking to me about logic, when you rely on a shady tabloid magazine and believed it when it published a biased narrative of this whole story.
I have such a hard time watching Japanese dramas especially romantic dramas because in almost everyone I watched…
Please don't judge all Japanese dramas by these Manga adaptations. There are specific type of Manga-s that cater to different tastes, niches and even fetishes. Its like reading a romance novel, although each story is different you already know what type of characters you will get in each specific troupe for example Rich guy/Poor Girl, Innocent Girl/Bad Boy. A series with 9 episodes of 30 min is bound to be moving very fast and there is no time to explain certain aspects of the drama. Its like a limited edition (fantasy) and you are just supposed to enjoy what is presented in from of you.Go along for the ride. That's why Manga is popular, its a quick read outside of your logic.
Haha, not to be taken serious. Its like a soft bad boy erotica novel and i have a feeling the Manga was/is highly addictive . Though the Yakuza might be a bit offended by how they are portrayed in this series. i enjoyed the sexy dialogue, beautiful cinematography and ridiculousness of the whole premise of this series.
haha, you too funny. i love it when someone understands me...portrait is still holding up.have only used 3 of my 18 years of being bad & nasty. My soul is not black and twisted yet.
It's better to be stupid like me, than come up with nothing while pretending to use a so-called brain.
The writer made it seem like her dreams were linked to her memory which is not true. She spoke up against her mother-in-law and got a divorce. That shows she had some spirit or spunk in her. She was actually stronger than her mum as well, so I don't get it at the end of the day. The writer tried very hard to keep the FL both infantile, innocent and stupid which contradicts with her earlier life and character and the story itself.
It's high time that script writers write better female characters, not victims of circumstances or plot devices.
Personal attacks: The statement "given your level of stupidity" is a personal attack and does not contribute to a productive discussion. Engaging in ad hominem attacks undermines the quality of the argument and distracts from the main points being made.
Mischaracterization of the opposing position: You claim that my position is "neither objective nor based on anything except because you want to beat your anti-men agenda." However, you provide no evidence or specific examples to support this assertion. It is important to address the specific arguments and evidence put forth by the other person rather than making generalized accusations.
Ad hominem accusation: You argue that my position is based solely on their "hatred for men." However, without examining the specific arguments and evidence presented by the other person, it is unfair and unjustified to assume that my position is motivated by personal bias.
Lack of evidence: You assert that my position is not based on anything substantial, but you fail to provide any evidence or reasoning to support this claim. It is essential to present concrete evidence, logical reasoning, or reliable sources (not Dispatch) to support your assertions and engage in a constructive debate.
Inconsistency in blame game accusation: You accuse me of starting a blame game while simultaneously asserting that they are doing the very thing they accused others of. This creates confusion and undermines the coherence of your argument.
You are the one that needs to grow-up and stop the "ad hominem" pseudo-logical reasoning. Your rhetorical strategy where you attack the character, motive, and other attributes of the people who have a different opinion from you rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself is laughable and shows whose really dumb at the end of the day.Name calling, illogical arguments, assumptions and you call other people dumb. (Really)
Objective view over what? KSH already admitted to the relationship and baby so whats there to be objective about.Love or Hate his ex-girlfriend that doesn't make him innocent or change the facts.
Better if you spend your time forming coherent sentences and arguments.