Pearl Harbor

I think you clearly missed the point I was trying to make in my post....it's the abuse one human is doing on another.... It could be a man on a woman and vice versa..... Whoever it is, they should be held accountable and punished....

You have already used the trump card in the very 1st line...so how can I even argue or put my opinion forth....

I really don't know if you have read my post clearly..... I said, the senior guy is trash and nobody here , including myself is defending him.... it's the female lawyer, who is sleeping with him consciously and stating that she fell for his schemes is the problem....he did not intoxicate her or rape her...she WILLING slept with him....

About the war thing..
I said in the history/past....so please don't waste your energy if you have not read my post properly.....
I have problem with the way the messages are being conveyed through this drama.... This is on Netflix so millions could be watching across the globe....

Exactly.... ML never gives them any case nor takes them to the court.... We have not seen him mentoring the other 1st years as well ... How is a 1st year able to get so many cases and how is she so effortlessly convincing them to take all of them....1st it was the painting case, where she so easily convinced them to take it as a pro-bono without much approvals...ML is a busy lawyer but he will take anything that FL throws at him.....

God Bless You!!!! What a way to put this across.....
Exactly my point......As korean wave now reaching to even the remote areas, teenage girls are getting enchanted with these wrong ideologies....

What a disgusting episode (ep8) in the guise of independent women/strong women/ wonder woman concept...... The episode started with saying how women in different fields are thriving and leaving there strong remarks and footholding and went on proving this in a wrong way, wrong examples....i was so furious till it ended and was hoping there will be somewhere a saving scene but nope....it just went into the gutter...
Let's talk about the two topics that was addressed in ep 8....(Arrrghhhhh)

1. Workplace harassment: I initially felt bad for that female lawyer that she was going through harassment for no reason at all but later "madam" was like i slept with him...i was like whatttt...i was hoping to hear that he raped her but naa, she slept with him willingly and named it as "she fell for his schemes , lol"....That senior guy was rude, harsh with her from the get go, he harassed her and took her to entertain clients/brokers without giving her any actual work, she knew what she was doing but yet, she slept with him because he said something sweet randomly (it sounded creepy more than sweet talk)...Nobody is supporting that trash senior guy but putting all the blame on him when she willing slept with him was the new bottom and play victim here........She could have gone to the ML when it all had started but she went when he said, he would frame her as the one who seduced a married guy...lol.....if this hadn't happened then she would have keep sleeping with him in the name of keeping her job, lol......heights of playing victim.....At the end, i didn't feel a bit of sympathy for her.

2. Physical assault on a man/husband by a woman under the influence - This was the new heights of brainwashing women showing the wrong way or wrong scenarios to say she is strong....
She was a working woman , infact a well known public figure so i am not sure why she didn't walk out of the marriage and endured it for 10 years. I initially thought they might have a kid together so she chose to stay in that kinda marriage...but, to my surprise there was no kid so i really didn't understand the reason...what was she trying to show to send a message " to stay and endure the abuse", will she tell the same to her sister if she also faces the same in the future....are we trying to teach our daughters that, stay and endure and if you fall into depression then take medication and fall to a new pit....
What was the difference between the news anchor and her husband, at the end of the day they both got intoxicated and hit their spouses knowingly...and women played the woman card here and all supported her because "she is a woman".......and she even walked away without any consequences....if it was a man, then everyone here would have slandered him till his ears bled. Also, the nail to the coffin was "The girls watching the assault video and laughing",...what if this was the husband and he was showing the video to his friends and laughing with them....this scenario sounds dirty right........My grandma used to say this "if a man is considered as head (part of the body), then woman can be considered as the neck, which moves the head"...women are very cunning, never take them for granted...we lack in physical strength compared to a man but we can be more cunning than a man.......most of the war in the past had happened because of a woman or for a woman...and this episode proved that how they can play the victim card, walk away without any consequences.....

We are not here to see or decide who is the victim, human hitting another human is wrong......and that human should be held accountable unless it was for self defence. Here it was clearly intentional....I was furious that this episode tried sending this message "to safeguard the family" (how funny)...Then nobody should be punished even if they kill someone under the influence because according to this drama that they were "incapable of making sane decision"....god....what a trash way of writing and sending a wrong message

How is this "my logic" or "your logic"....she is a woman from 21st century and who has time traveled....this doesn't take away her upbringing or morals, also she is going to use her 21st Century culinary skills into use there, so that proves my point....also, whatever you have written talks more about you and your thinking

She has time traveled that doesn't mean she will all her learnings from 21st century.

I think you have forgotten that she is from the 2025s so it's considered morally wrong to date a married man...

I think you have forgotten that she is from the 2025s so it's considered morally wrong to date a married man...

So the king is a married man and the FL falls in love with a married man....hmmm....

It was made clear in the previous drama " law and the city" where the judge will reject the case because the plaintiff and the defendant were represented by the same firm.

It's not about internal rule or not, the main point here is it's the ML who initiated and set that rule up ....so looks like he doesn't like getting romantically involved with his colleagues

I doubt as the age difference between the second couple is 10 years.... She is 42 and he is 32.... So this one would be a little more...like 11-12 years

What are you saying.... His ex wife said, she realized about being a mother as she approached late 30s...he might be 40 or more

The age difference between kwon Na Yeon and yun soek hun (ML) is 9 years and he admires her as she was his mentor and respects her. The age difference between Yun Soek Hun and Kang Hyo Min is 15+ years so i feel considering the age diff, the possibility of the 1st set getting into a relationship is most likely....but that won't happen as this is a kdrama........every second comment here is about the romance that, romance this.......why cannot kang hyo min just admire him as her mentor....she herself is an exceptional to be lawyer and her parents were into law as well so she won't be mind blown by his capabilities...... even partners at work can have great chemistry because they are from the same team.....why not just enjoy the drama as it is written and executed so wellll.......

I am not talking about the location...I am talking about how he figured out that her phone is not with her or the convenience store guy was planning to answer the call

I am at ep 2 and felt as if the dialogues are random and doesn't make sense -
For ex:
1. When she came back to the CEO and said she wants to take up the project about travelling for a client, then why did the CEO say she can do whatever...i mean, didn't he also want the same, also why did he cut ties with her??? it didn't make sense....she was doing what they wanted to do so why...He was like, figure out if you want to go back home or do any part time job but she was saying she will do the trip for the client...lol
2. Ep 2. flash back when the kid FL told her dad that she will be going to Seoul then he was like with a serious face " Don't come back here, never return"....i mean, why so serious....shouldn't he be happy....
3. Ep. 2, How did ML know that she has left her cell phone at the convenience store? She herself realized very later...

I felt the emotions were wrong, the dialogues were random........i guess i will keep watching as i don't have anything else to see right now

Tell me about it..... She was apparently late at Lee & Seo as well so she was let go (looks like she didn't put up a fight there) but she did at Yullim, they hear her out because she is some debate champion even though she was late to the interview, isn't that unfair to other candidates.

Sorry, my friend.... Your original comment stated your own assumptions of the character.....she herself confessed that she did it to get more info from him when she was apologizing to the ML....she didn't freeze.... You can go back and check