Liking cliches, when I promised I wouldn't is so me!! I was angry because they had a childhood connection, but…
Yeah I like that as well. One thing I don't like the most is the dark side of this story. I was hoping for a fun, light drama that makes me giggle through out and feel relax. But noooo, the evil "white hair" uncle part has to be included with all the dark tropes such as that nasty ceo guy from the raffle housing thing that treats people like they owe him the world - the entitled characters that we see in many dramas. Asides from that, I like everything else so far.
First of all I don't get the unnecessary hate train for SJK. He's one of the best and good looking actors of this generation, I loved him since innocent man and Im glad i get to watch his drama, his personal life should not be basis on whether we should watch or not watch his dramas, second i read someone said that this character just don't fit him... I disagree, I can't imagine any other actor pulling of this character and once again SJK has proven he's a versatile actor. The chemistry of both leads and second couple is amazing to me, and all character has charm this drama feels so warm yet so sad and I love it. Some may find it boring or slow or may hate the sick plot but to me it's all good, maybe it's just a matter of preference.
Replying togr8h8m8•Oct 13, 2025•Liked Oct 14, 2025
FOOD for thought Comparing the two LuSi collabs with this same editor in Love's Ambition and previously, Dating In The Kitchen:
1) LA moves from angst to romcom AND DITK moves from romcom to some angst 2) Both have older MLs because they were experienced CEOs 3) Both have ML who were calculating and went about catching the FL's deception (in the DITK drama, it was all very funny while in LA it was very tense and angsty) 4) The seduction parts were funny. Well, LuSi's comic timing has always been amazing, so no surprise here. But you can see the ML's chase of his girl was hilarious and silly, just like Hao Ming in LA. Here is a grown man, resorting to immature antics because all his life, he'd been just the CEO son to his mother's expectations. Compared that to Hao Ming's inability to express his love. 4) The FLs' natural talents and their struggles to get recognized in their respective fields because favoritism/nepotism/connections, etc. 5) LuSi was quite young in the first collab so it wasn't as sexy as her more mature character in LA. Still, both MLs were established stars in their own right and worked very well with LuSi. 6) You can see the Director's stamp in both dramas--the funny scenes were unique and the more serious scenes were layered with emotion.
Here’s a thought — why don't you go to the actual page of that person you don't like and do your screaming there instead of targeting the innocent, which are the main cast and crew of this drama? Misplaced anger doesn’t make you righteous; it just makes you complicit. At that point, you’re no different than a bully— spreading hate, generalizing without facts, and fueling propaganda under the guise of justice.
Go do this to your fan shi qi’s main drama as lead role… don’t do this to lusi and william’s drama.. otherwise you’re also an abuser… how dare you abuse lusi
Comparing the two LuSi collabs with this same editor in Love's Ambition and previously, Dating In The Kitchen:
1) LA moves from angst to romcom AND DITK moves from romcom to some angst
2) Both have older MLs because they were experienced CEOs
3) Both have ML who were calculating and went about catching the FL's deception (in the DITK drama, it was all very funny while in LA it was very tense and angsty)
4) The seduction parts were funny. Well, LuSi's comic timing has always been amazing, so no surprise here. But you can see the ML's chase of his girl was hilarious and silly, just like Hao Ming in LA. Here is a grown man, resorting to immature antics because all his life, he'd been just the CEO son to his mother's expectations. Compared that to Hao Ming's inability to express his love.
4) The FLs' natural talents and their struggles to get recognized in their respective fields because favoritism/nepotism/connections, etc.
5) LuSi was quite young in the first collab so it wasn't as sexy as her more mature character in LA. Still, both MLs were established stars in their own right and worked very well with LuSi.
6) You can see the Director's stamp in both dramas--the funny scenes were unique and the more serious scenes were layered with emotion.