Ends on a cliff hanger. He does acknowledge him as his boyfriend, but it was intended to have a second season
A have both books, but only managed to read half of the first one. I will say the show is a bit more enduring than the books, but after reading it, it just made the interaction feel less violation. So I have mixed feelings about the sequel.
I wonder the same, but in the end I gave it a try and it didn’t disappoint me not one bit. What I’ve noticed…
Jaja! Ok that makes since...Im a bit of the same with the liking low rated shows. It's true stuff usually highly rated are fan fluff most times but that's not always the case
Unpopular opinion, but when will Korea stop giving us violent gay narratives. I'm talking about how one or both characters are in a situation were violence is acted upon them. At first I didn't notice it, but it seems to be a thread, almost like Japan from time to time. Don't gete wrong this show is super cute and I love it, but why are hang sa debt collectors thugs(not saying that couldn't be the case in real life) or like with White night(hard core bullying) long time no see(both were assassin's (still a personal fav) but again violent) even where your eyes linger, had some. It's still like gay folk are other and associated with bad. Maybe I'm over thinking and will do some more research, but does anyone else feel like this is a pattern?
Alot of this is filler. Though it fits in with the them of in between, it's just like could y'all have done something else, like use that time to explore Bianca's "alleged" crumbling relationship or something. I love the focus but it's like souch time is water retreading over stuff we already know. It's like the audience isn't be trusted enough to follow the story so it's told to us multiple times
maybe you should rewatch that scene, Techno was clearly conscious and clearly enjoying it. the only problem with…
You still miss the point. It's an argument about normalizing sexual misconduct and blueing the lines of consent by having the victim being wooed by his rapist. It's the fact that you earlier tried to justify that No consented to rape. Yet you're so willing to prove others wrong for calling rape, rape you're willing to verbally attack us who don't agree with the fact that nonconsentual sex is rape, and that it's problematic how the show has handled it
I really hope the Philippines start addressing the toxic family dynamics that seem to be prevalent. This show has been good at addressing things, but it's still surface level, to me at least. I'm not from the Philippines nor do I know much about their society. All I have is what is being shown.
maybe you should rewatch that scene, Techno was clearly conscious and clearly enjoying it. the only problem with…
You're ignoring the point and picking two arguments again. Yes it's fictional, but here's the rub bub, using No's comments about Kla is problematic because there will be people who think like you and be like oh I can rape some one and they actually won't be bothered. Sometimes people are that terrible and look for justification in anything. I'm deviating but here's my point. We were given a scenario, and instead of using it as a tool to teach about consent and issues that plague society it was treated as a joke and romanticised. Your argument show that you fell for it. You acknowledge it's wrong but then you want to argue down that you got caught in your error. It would have been different if you acknowledged it and learned instead you chose the it's just fictional. Still what is being shown happens to people. When audiences are shown this it is a responsibility to handle that responsibly, and that's why we are being harsh because rape was shown and the writer chose to follow the script of BL and not tackle the issue maturely. You don't know how you trigger someone who may have been I. That same situation and had it dismissed. That's the crux of my issue. Ask yourself why you see it as consentual and ok and why you need to argue with people who justifiably called rape wrong
Already lost. Didn't realise it was a poem at the beginning. The version I saw didn't translate it so I was left thinking, 'well I hope it isn't too important.'. that aside it looks interesting, but super short at the moment
1. He bribe ahis slave to make Joey enter the acting class 2, He command his slave to Make Joey lose his job…
Y'all scrambling. He didn't bribe him. Also not his "slave". Get over yourself. These are fictional characters, but I'm tired of people jumping to these wild conclusions. Seeing what y'all want to see Again he tried to get Joey fired yes it's a dick move and I have stted that before, but, as I've also stated he did it out of a misguided love to protect Joey from Kenji who in fact violated Joey's space. Morality is fine, I'm just not blind and or petty as you. I'm making an argument based off what's being presented to the viewers. Cause too many are targeting Will and missing the point and are quick to ship Joey and Jimmy even though Jimmy was a dick. But somehow that qualifies him as perfect...sounds like something deeper. Forgiveness is fine, but that doesn't excuse his behaviour. Yes will has done the one bad thing, also it never happened. Need I remind you?
It's still like gay folk are other and associated with bad. Maybe I'm over thinking and will do some more research, but does anyone else feel like this is a pattern?
This show has been good at addressing things, but it's still surface level, to me at least. I'm not from the Philippines nor do I know much about their society.
All I have is what is being shown.
I'm deviating but here's my point. We were given a scenario, and instead of using it as a tool to teach about consent and issues that plague society it was treated as a joke and romanticised. Your argument show that you fell for it. You acknowledge it's wrong but then you want to argue down that you got caught in your error. It would have been different if you acknowledged it and learned instead you chose the it's just fictional. Still what is being shown happens to people. When audiences are shown this it is a responsibility to handle that responsibly, and that's why we are being harsh because rape was shown and the writer chose to follow the script of BL and not tackle the issue maturely. You don't know how you trigger someone who may have been I. That same situation and had it dismissed. That's the crux of my issue. Ask yourself why you see it as consentual and ok and why you need to argue with people who justifiably called rape wrong
Again he tried to get Joey fired yes it's a dick move and I have stted that before, but, as I've also stated he did it out of a misguided love to protect Joey from Kenji who in fact violated Joey's space.
Morality is fine, I'm just not blind and or petty as you. I'm making an argument based off what's being presented to the viewers. Cause too many are targeting Will and missing the point and are quick to ship Joey and Jimmy even though Jimmy was a dick. But somehow that qualifies him as perfect...sounds like something deeper. Forgiveness is fine, but that doesn't excuse his behaviour.
Yes will has done the one bad thing, also it never happened. Need I remind you?