Myung Gil was arrested by Interpol which means he was handed over to the Korean government after. He lost his…
Kim Sae Ron was arrested during the shooting of the last two episodes, which is why they couldn't physically include her and they had to change everything, as a result. I haven't read the webtoon, so I don't know what the original ending should have been.
As for the villain being killed... I don't know... The main lead is not a killer. It would have been out of character for him to kill the villain. Unlike Vincenzo, The Glory etc., where total destruction of the villain was the goal, the main lead here just wanted to stop the villain from hurting people. I thought character-wise, it made sense.
Total unsatisfactory and unfair outcome, good side lost everything, so many good lives were lost and they can't…
Myung Gil was arrested by Interpol which means he was handed over to the Korean government after. He lost his money and casino. That's all he cared about.
ML were never money lenders, so it makes sense that they use the money to build a hospital that helps provide health benefits for those who cannot afford it. Choi always gave money with zero interest when it comes to hospital bills, so this aligns with his interests.
And the actress who played Hyeon Joo got arrested for drinking and driving while they were shooting the show and was removed from the last two episodes as a result.
Hi! Out of curiosity, could you tell me what the plot holes are?
I think I get where you're coming from.
So not all their cash was at the bookstore and at his place. Choi had several accounts with billions. The cash and gold was just some of the liquid cash they had for their everyday lending money work. He didn't care if he lost some of it because he still had quite a lot. He owns buildings, the orphanage etc.
As for when they moved the money, if I remember right, they did it within 36 hours of finding out that their bookstore was compromised.
As for hiring extra men, I don't think he needed it. There were several scenes (like when they ate sushi) where the older knifers told their plans which only needed a few people with skills. - I think it was done to show the difference between Choi, who liked to work stealthily with skill and minimal damage vs. Myung Gil who did everything like a war hammer, with brute force and optimal damage.
There were several scenes where the group discussed how they were going to take the villain down. Like the plan regarding the hospital, the fish farm, the phone and the safe etc.
I guess I've watched badly written/directed dramas too many times that these didn't strike me as plot holes.
(Eg:- In Taxi Driver Season 2 the main character teleports. Literally shows up somewhere he wasn't for a car chase. I'm still in shock from that. LOL).
I never trust 1/10 ratings tbh. 1/10 means, bad writing, bad editing, bad directing, bad acting and an overall…
You misunderstood.
I said the worst possible rating you can give on this website is 1/10, hence, the only way to justify a 1/10 rating is if everything is bad from writing, acting, directing. Basically, the show has to be unwatchable.
You replied:
"" Everything has to be bad to justify a 1/10 rating". No, it doesn't. The actor/actresses were excellent, and it's probably the only area given for the 1 rating, to acknowledge them."
So what you said was 1/10 meant the show was bad but the actors were excellent.
So, I asked you, if 1/10 (the worst possible rating on this website) is given to a show which is bad but with "excellent" acting, what rating would you give a show that has bad acting and is bad all around? You already used the worst rating on a show with "excellent" actors. Rating-wise, you can't go lower than that.
Not the best ending, but it was okay. The court scene was too rushed and unrealistic for me. I think one extra episode would have benefited this drama.
I expected to cry, but I didn't. The parallels were touching though.
dont get why people are rating this a 1.0 i think its a good drama so i would rate it an 8.5
1/10 ratings are hate ratings. Mostly people hate the ending and forget everything that happened from the first episode. Shows like Do Do Sol Sol La La Sol and Twenty-Five Twenty-One had a lot of these. They do it to bring the overall rating down.
So tragic, yet perfect.
The acting, however, was great. I have faith in both main leads, so I'm hoping this gets better (story-wise).
As for the villain being killed... I don't know... The main lead is not a killer. It would have been out of character for him to kill the villain. Unlike Vincenzo, The Glory etc., where total destruction of the villain was the goal, the main lead here just wanted to stop the villain from hurting people. I thought character-wise, it made sense.
ML were never money lenders, so it makes sense that they use the money to build a hospital that helps provide health benefits for those who cannot afford it. Choi always gave money with zero interest when it comes to hospital bills, so this aligns with his interests.
And the actress who played Hyeon Joo got arrested for drinking and driving while they were shooting the show and was removed from the last two episodes as a result.
https://www.allkpop.com/article/2023/06/director-of-bloodhounds-personally-explains-why-he-decided-to-leave-kim-sae-ron-in-the-drama
So not all their cash was at the bookstore and at his place. Choi had several accounts with billions. The cash and gold was just some of the liquid cash they had for their everyday lending money work. He didn't care if he lost some of it because he still had quite a lot. He owns buildings, the orphanage etc.
As for when they moved the money, if I remember right, they did it within 36 hours of finding out that their bookstore was compromised.
As for hiring extra men, I don't think he needed it. There were several scenes (like when they ate sushi) where the older knifers told their plans which only needed a few people with skills. - I think it was done to show the difference between Choi, who liked to work stealthily with skill and minimal damage vs. Myung Gil who did everything like a war hammer, with brute force and optimal damage.
There were several scenes where the group discussed how they were going to take the villain down. Like the plan regarding the hospital, the fish farm, the phone and the safe etc.
I guess I've watched badly written/directed dramas too many times that these didn't strike me as plot holes.
(Eg:- In Taxi Driver Season 2 the main character teleports. Literally shows up somewhere he wasn't for a car chase. I'm still in shock from that. LOL).
I said the worst possible rating you can give on this website is 1/10, hence, the only way to justify a 1/10 rating is if everything is bad from writing, acting, directing. Basically, the show has to be unwatchable.
You replied:
"" Everything has to be bad to justify a 1/10 rating". No, it doesn't. The actor/actresses were excellent, and it's probably the only area given for the 1 rating, to acknowledge them."
So what you said was 1/10 meant the show was bad but the actors were excellent.
So, I asked you, if 1/10 (the worst possible rating on this website) is given to a show which is bad but with "excellent" acting, what rating would you give a show that has bad acting and is bad all around? You already used the worst rating on a show with "excellent" actors. Rating-wise, you can't go lower than that.
I expected to cry, but I didn't. The parallels were touching though.