MiHnn

I've watched her in Memories of Alhambra, Doctors, Pinocchio, The Heirs, You're Beautiful and #Alive, and I think she would really excel in slice of life melodramas. She always looks uncomfortable in kissing scenes, so I really don't think she suits romance scenes. Even in Memories of Alhambra and Pinocchio where the kissing scenes were arguably better than the others, her cringing is so obvious. I feel bad for her. She must be so uncomfortable.

I highly recommend you check out Train for a show about time travel. I kid you not, no plot holes. I've heard the same about 365: Repeat the Year, but I haven't personally watched that one.

I've watched until episode 12. xD

"Are you incompetent or just plain stupid?" - I've been asking myself this same question for every episode about the Control Bureau, and I still have no answer. LMAO.

Brilliant article! Well written, well articulated, and I love the style.

Yep yep. This is based off the Zac Efron film 17 Again. It's the same main relationship as this one. He doesn't end up with his daughter. lol.

Well, that was what happened in 17 again. I'm glad they decided against that plot for this version.

As a fictional show it 100% glamorizes psychopathic behaviour. When I said that Mouse is a good study on psychopath behaviour, I meant it in a fictional sense. Because the entire show focuses on psychopaths from beginning to end unlike other shows where the psychopath is the antagonist and a plot device. In this show, we have followed three psychopaths already with a fourth emerging now. After all. these shows are not documentaries backed by science. They are fiction. Watching any of these shows thinking any semblance of it is realistic would be misguided.

Cool. Since these are all fiction, none of these shows have anything to do with understanding psychopathic behaviour (realistically). All these shows use them as a plot device. Where Mouse differs is with the main character being a potential psychopath. Which means that while normally we follow the psychopathic character as an antagonist (and get a limited view into his mind as a result), this time we'll be following a psychopathic character as a protagonist. The fact that a psychopathic character is a protagonist means that by default, we the viewers get more into his mindset than if he had been an antagonist.

Definitely. The only part of the direction I like is the close contact fight scenes. Those are shot well. The use of guns and the other other action scenes are almost comical. Very old school, and people take a long time to react.

Before I say anything... Have you caught up with all the episodes?

I typed something, and then realised that is a massive spoiler/theory for someone if they haven't watched until Episode 8.

It all comes down to preference. For me, Vincenzo is the kind of show that starts meh and gets better as it goes on (it's the style of the writer). It's currently one of my favourite airing shows, but I find Sisyphus full of filler episodes and mostly boring after the good start. So it really comes down to what people like.

I found it to be realistic. Without any leads, they don't know where to look for the body.

I recommend Mouse as a good study on a psychopath (since the entire show is about how a psychopath's brain works).

At least he has a life goal. lol.

I'm currently watching Beyond Evil, Mouse and Vincenzo where the villains are all psychopaths. This will make the fourth show that is currently airing that has a psychopath villain. Maybe it's a trend.

That's it? That seems more generic than I would have liked.

How am I supposed to wait 20 hours???

Great! Why does he want to destroy the Korean peninsula?

Thanks. I had a feeling it won't be much. I think I'll skip those episodes and go straight to 13.

Both are good. Mouse is a dark thriller and Vincenzo is a dark comedy. So it really depends on what you prefer.