Truth Dares

I can only say the same to you. It is nothing but a very subjective and prejudiced opinion which you guys cannot back up.

You can only speak for yourself and others are not bound to feel the same about it.

For me even "cheating is wrong" is too categorical. I can list several examples where it is almost inevitable. When someone is trapped in a bad marriage for instance and the other person does not want them let go. There are non-monogamous relationships as well. Or even ones where one of them is non-monogamous while the other is monogamous, but the latter accepts this premise. You can say it is not for you, but if they are okay with it who are we to tell it is wrong? I also know about relationships where the parties love each other deeply but one of them has high sex drive while the other one does not, the former started straying and the latter came to the conclusion to accept it.

"But isn't this the truth that once a cheater is always a cheater." Really? And have you seen any scientific research or specific report or study about this ? Or is it just a generalizing bullshit you saw somewhere and go on and on about it? I think I know the answer.

And how do you know it has not happened to me? Guess what once I even found my bf in flagranti with someone else in bed. And also guess what I can still see the difference between my case and an uncertain young lad's from whom a random kiss was stolen. When you are not driven by your nursed grudges and resentments it helps the objectivity a lot.

Infidelity is a complex issue in most cases and not the black and white, "irreversible betrayal" as MDL children try to project it.

In this particular case, having casual attractions and random erotic thoughts about someone else while you are in a relationship (as happy as a relationship can be) is not infidelity and it is a common occurrence for grown-ups - especially among gays - and it is something you cannot help. Casual attraction and random erotic desire are beyond our control.

"Not every person is a casual cheater nor does it mean the cheater has fallen out of love with their current partner prior to cheating."

Louder for those in the back. The number of times I read this "once a cheater, always a cheater" bullshit people keep parroting like eternal truth whereas it is totally baseless.

I did not say sexual assault. Making such demands in such circumstances is not a sexual assault by any sane minds, but even someone you find sexually attractive could offer you indecent proposals and demand sexual advances you might find embarrassing. It just gives their personal relationship and dynamics a grey shade. I am certainly not the person who cries SA for any sort of grey areas, like the puritanical children of this site, but to me it seems the boss is not afraid to use his power, authority and Que's dependent position to make Que his, as well as Que seems to be uncomfortable by that even if the attraction is apparently mutual. From the preview it seems they are going to have another scene where the boss is naked. I can easily imagine it is one of Que's "duties" to serve the boss in bed as well.

That sentence "Are you taking responsibility for him every time?" while caressing Que's neck and Que's nervous face gave me the impression the boss has already made some advances on Que to make him compensate big boss for his Nong's wrongdoings. This, of course, does not exclude mutual attraction.

Does the boss of dirty baseball games demand sex from Que?

Love triangle or more precisely the challenge/temptation when another crush/suitor appears is a regular and repeated occurrence in a relationship, straight or gay, hence it is a fair plot device for drama, no matter how BL fans get aneurism from it for some mysterious reason.

I am glad I could help to find your level and made your day with a typo. So long.

You are a troll because you are ingorant, you have no arguments, literally nothing but labelling and verbal abuse. Jog along.

Not just in Latin countries. The age consent is below 18 literally almost everywhere in the civilised world.
Marc is clearly a lot more mature than these freaks in the comment section.

If that is how it sounds to you then you are dumber than it first seemed, and that is an achievement. I am not gonna start a slanging match with just another troll uncapable of sane conversation. Your ilk never reads and argues just spouts bs and screams abuse. That is all you can do. And no, not everyone is a child under 18. Educate yourself. In the meantime, go back under your stone. My way of thinking is thankfully not defined by trolls like you, so I don't give a flying fuck about you. Jog along.

Exactly. This is all virtue signalling. What is really horrifying they all think of themselves as caring and concerning people while they have literally zero empathy or compassion.

Did I hit a nerve? All right. Just don't shit yourself. Diaper is expensive.

BL (even in censored form) and bromance are two completely different genres. Do you research.

What constantly springs to my mind whenever this puritanical shitshow starts what these peeps would say to the real-life couple Both and Newyear. Their age difference is significantly lower but it is still 7 years and they got together when Newyear was 17 (technically minor) and Both was 24 (technically adult).

They have been happily together for 12 years now and if the law of same sex marriage really takes effect soon (x fingers) they are more than like to to get married as well.

May I ask these Karens if they trashed them too and called their beautiful love and relationship gross, creepy, pedo, etc? That is when they usually evaporate like fart in a sea storm.

Stay with me is NOT bromance.

These meltdown drama queens are usually uptight, neo-victorian western schoolgirls who literally enjoy transgressive pearl-clutching, that is what they live for. And while they love sprinkling their bs with fashionable lingo of various aspects of sexual assaults they are also ignorant and totally clueless. They don't even know that paedophile means being sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children and a 16 years old minor guy above age consent limit is nowhere near belongs to this category. Even if they had sex in real life that would not be illegal.

This whole thing is ridiculous and hypocritical to the core. So at the age of 14, Jodie Foster can play a chain-smoking, seasoned teenage prostitute who has shagged with half of New York in Taxi Driver in such a way that she was nominated for an Oscar. Macaulay Culkin can play an evil serial killer at the age of 13. But for a 16-year-old to play another 16 or 17-year-old, who has homoerotic kink thoughts, perversions, and subsequent actions to follow, like bed scenes, that is the end of the world. Because 16-year-olds never think like that, let alone doing it before blowing out 18 candles on their birthday cakes. The entire moanfest is about their own phobias. They want to desexualize everyone under the magical number of 18 (as if the maturity of each person were defined by this arbitrary number, we all know some are mature at 16 and some are not even over 20) for the peace of their prudish minds. If anything is sick than that is. I see the one who wanted to call the police on you has Jeff and Barcode in their profile pic. You really cannot make this up.

Feck off, imbecile.