Truth Dares

Then educate yourself about the difference between so called "real life children" and post-pubescent minors above age consent, especially in terms of legal capabilities and IQ+EQ differences. Those who cannot make this distinction are per definition prudes. You're welcome. Furthermore we all know that so-called "concern" - which this 16 years old does not need and has not asked for, let alone any of you to butt in his business - is nothing but virtue signalling and play-acting faux outrage for self-appreciation.

Another reassurance that sane people should not give a flying feck about the overwhelmingly asinine comments of this site. I purposefully avoided it to judge it myself. Now I looked back some and goodness me...

Nothing world-shattering and sometimes a bit elongated, but it was a charming, nicely done, thoroughly lovely slice of life romance with amiable performers.

The ending very obviously suggests an upcoming second season but even for those who could not figure it out (though not a rocket science) should be clear about it by the QA after the finale. But why would they bother some fact-checking instead of moaning, sure.

And here come the apoplectic prudish BL Karens in a row with their panties twisted around their necks. Pass the popcorn.

And the reason? Just because some prudish A-holes pulled that out of their arses? Mind your own business.

It was so frigging obvious that episode 4 was not the final, from the way it ended and from the way Sukfilm heralded it in its channel, never calling it final, but the belligerent fucktards run here knee-jerk to vomit their ball out and downvote an otherwise decent, if not outstanding series. What an emetic snake pit this site is, goodness me.

You have used a term incorrectly and you were corrected. When this happens to me if I made mistakes, like everybody does, I usually say "Thank you, I should have used the right term". That is also an option for a possible reaction, assuming someone is intelligent and adult enough, instead of making a tantrum that somebody dared to correct me.

By using this term incorrectly you wrongly label totally legal and morally impeccable relationships, like the 12 year-old relationship of Both and Newyear who got together when one of them was a minor, as paedophilia. It is not hard to see why it is important, especially nowadays when everyone just throws the "paedophile" stamp around like pepper on food. Hopefully now you understand it. Bye.

"adults and minors because that’s pedophilia" That is what you wrote. It is factually wrong.

Get your medication fixed.

Get your facts straight. Paedophilia is when adults have sexual attraction to prepubescent kids, not minors. Adults and minors is NOT paedophilia. Actually it is even legal when the minor is above the age consent defined by that particular country.

As for the last scene, I am undecided whether he moved out or was he in the same condo. I was also wondering whether it was supposed to be a different condo but shot at the same one with different lighting (budget). But at the end of the day, it is not even that important. It could have been the same condo too, the day after. The importance of the phone call is the relevance: the sign they carry on.

Daily misuse of buzzword "toxic" ticked. Sweet dreams.

There were no 3 endings. The 3 scenes came in a row, in chronological order. On their way back home in the park they agree that YD moves out and SH keeps in touch with him. Then they go home and spend a night together, also agreeing they try to get back together (but not immediately, their agreement in the park is still valid), and then the third scene is about SH calling YD and asking how he was, inviting him for dinner, so SH gives YD a sign he no longer avoids him.

They practically agreed they start "seeing/dating/getting to know" each other. I think the way we define this procedure is almost irrelevant. They realized that their life could be better if they try together but at the same time they both know it is a long way to go. SH needs some space and figure himself out without having to be fully responsible for others like he used to be for his parents, while YD has to learn how to love himself and stand on his feet without leaning on and supported by those around him. And first of all, both have to overcome their gloomy past.

Seriously my mind boggles and explodes that peeps blame it on the low-budget, the production, the script, whatever that they could not grasp the point which was very well-told and eruditely articulated, just because the screenplay did not spoon-feed them by showing a displayer like "Hey man, here comes the message, read my lips".

It was an excellent drama from start to finish. Mind-blowing acting, sufficiently dark atmosphere, a brilliant animated intro, etc. I particularly loved their interesting dynamics, how they portrayed the complex way they tried to show care for each other while simultaneously hiding their feelings. They managed to compress so much emotion, feelings, character development into 5*20 minutes that it is on its own worth the adulation.

I would say a wispy, bittersweet but definitely optimistic ending. Their final conversation - on their way home and then by the bed - was all about their attempt to try while knowing they both have loads of packages to carry.

Brilliant. Thanks god, there are still a few thinking minds on this site. I stop with the avalanche of clueless comments now before I go crazy, I suppose.

Hats off. You are one of the few who figured it out. It was not that difficult though. Their conversation on the way home pretty much introduced this coda.

A perfectly fitting and suitable ending to the story of two broken souls tentatively trying to reach out to each other but still being full of fear and uncertainty.
And as expected the lovey-dovey obsessed fujoshi teenage girls have their panties in a twist. Good. This drama was too much for them to process in the first place.

I am not gonna argue with anyone who thinks that a kiss is cheating. Life is too short for that.