Bruh....how is this 7.6? The first episode was actually really good! Some people on here are smoking some serious…
Bruh...this is garbage. Even my adorable New can't save this turd. 7.6 is WAY higher than this thing deserves.
It's telling that you say nothing good about the show except that it's "actually, really good," "people are smoking crack," "like come on now..." Those aren't positive assessments of anything in the show, just bland assertions and insults aimed at people with discernment.
I love New, but he needs to escape from Thailand because 99% of what comes out of there is crap. Maybe learn Korean and Japanese; try to get some exposure there.
I began watching Korean dramas because I was tired of so much sex and nudity on American TV. Korean dramas seem…
I may be nine years late, but what is your problem with sex? I mean, in general? Sex is a huge part of life, especially relationships, for better or for worse? How is it that actors pretending to have sex, just as they pretend to argue, pretend to cry, pretend to make dinner, is of some lower "moral standard" to you? Maybe try not getting your moral teachings from movies and television?
Also...where is all this sex and nudity you're claiming to see on American TV? I assume you're talking about premium channels, because there is next to no sex and nudity on American broadcast television. Please send me some links so I can enjoy all this hot sex you're talking about.
Show me where in the article it is proven or even mentioned, that the designs in the background are this woman's?…
lol, omg.
This idiotic comment is SO MDL.
"Korean" is a ethnicity/nationality, not a race, you dunce. My reference to being "Korean" is to the sad, Korean/Netizen habit of making up/believing/expanding on/spreading bullshit lies and rumors and innuendos online, which often lead to the Korean celebrity being attacked, whoever they may be, and there have been a lot of them, freaking killing themselves as a result.
Do you deny this is all too frequent an occurrence in Korea, or are you OK with it? If you agree it's a problem, then I guess you're a "racist" too.
I'm American. America has far more guns within its borders than people. That's a fact. We have mass shootings almost every day here. It's horrible. But in your little head, it would be "racist" of me to point that out because, you know, "American" is a "race," right? Just like "Korean" is.
I don't have to mention this, but I will because it's true: MOST of my favorite films, dramas, music, actors and singers live in Korea. They are "Korean," which in your tiny mind makes me a terrible "racist."
The Japanese to some degree, still secretly fancy themselves a superior "race" compared to Koreans and Han Chinese. However, there is less than a ONE PERCENT genetic difference between either one of these three groups and the other two.
"Korean" is an ethnicity, not a race, child. I'll let you google what that means.
What part of "1 or 2 seconds" don't you understand? This sloppy article, like all sloppy articles on MDL, does…
You're the Netizen here, trying to make a big scandal out of a mistake, AFTER the production company has acknowledged the mistake, apologized, and credited the designer who drew these amateurish cartoons. It's all over with, but MDL and you are shrieking "theft!" "conspiracy!"
This is one of the best things that ever happened to her.
You're also the Korean Netizen here using a non-existent, plural form of the word "evidence." There is no such word as "evidences." Only bad Korean-to-English translators write "evidences." I see it all the time in bad subtitles. Do you write those too?
You're probably also one of the Korean Netizens who enjoy hounding celebrities to suicide by making a big deal out of shit that either didn't happen or is none of your business. The "evidences" here are clear: You need a life.
Show me where in the article it is proven or even mentioned, that the designs in the background are this woman's?…
I'm not "defending" anyone. I'm pointing out how badly written this is, and how the photos shown don't prove a damn thing. That may not matter to you, but it does to me. Perhaps you're Korean and used to making up facts in your head to fill in what bad writers who want to imply things without proving them leave out of their articles, but I'm not Korean and I don't do that.
What part of "1 or 2 seconds" don't you understand? This sloppy article, like all sloppy articles on MDL, does…
Learn better English before trying to write with it.
I am a full-time artist and writer. I know exactly what I am talking about.
Your broadly presumptuous comment naturally ignores one of my main points: There is NO evidence in this article that the illustrations shown in that background shot are, in fact, the designer's. As I've already said twice, but have to repeat for slow readers like you, maybe they ARE, maybe they AREN'T, this article does not provide anything other than the designer's claim. It is a lazy, sloppily-written piece of junk journalism, which is why it's on MDL's front page.
The drawings next to the runway models, assuming they were made by the complaining designer, are NOT the ones in the background shot. And the designer herself says they were used in no other way but to hang there for two seconds, max.
Furthermore, even if the drawings ARE hers, and let's assume they are, so freaking what? She wrote the producers about it, they did whatever to satisfy her demands, and that was that. But yet, here we are, with this article and people like you, trying to act like this is some huge deal.
My guess is some lazy prop person copied them off the Internet and hung them there, never dreaming anyone would give a shit for a two second shot, or that anyone would notice. That person has doubtless been yelled at, and/or fired. OK, so...what?
It's the idea that this tempest in a teapot is featured as a big deal in a front- page MDL story AFTER it's already been dealt with, and people like you are jumping up and down pretending to be all outraged, that's ridiculous.
Show me where in the article it is shown/proven that the designs hanging in the background are those of this designer?…
Why are you implying "...those drawings will be turned into garments in the show," when nothing in this article indicates that is the case?
Your out-of-left-field implication, supported by NOTHING here, is a classic example of how rumors and innuendos and big nothing-burgers get turned into major controversies by irresponsible, anonymous netizen-writers like yourself.
Highlight on the *introduced as*."I don't know whether I should be happy that my designs are introduced as the…
Agreed. But..."slowly?" Nah, MDL is already All-KPoopAlltheTime.
What really pisses me off, and maybe you haven't noticed it, but MDL NEVER features articles, headlines, or anything else related to gay-themed films, series, or BLs on the front page. Like...EVER.
I have written the mods three different times at three different addresses, asking why this is the case and to please correct me if I'm wrong. As MDL does with everything else they simply don't want to acknowledge, my messages, all very polite, have been entirely ignored.
There is a clear anti-gay bias among the management of MDL. Perhaps they are afraid an article about a gay movie or actor on the front page might cause a mass exodus of members. Who knows?
Show me where in the article it is shown/proven that the designs hanging in the background are those of this designer?…
Where are these pictures, Karla, that you say are the same?
Why are you so eager to believe what this woman says, Karla?
I'm not even saying she's lying, Karla. I'm saying this article is a slop-fest and provides no basis for what this woman is saying...Karla.
Did you hear that "Karen" is a thing of some kind here in the U.S. and are trying to apply the meme to seem "with it," even though you're failing by using it randomly and stupidly? Or are you an American who STILL doesn't understand the meaning of the meme "Karen," despite living here?
Actually, there is no "Karen" in this situation, unless maybe it's MDL, sloppily attempting to make a mountain out of a molehill...Karla.
Highlight on the *introduced as*."I don't know whether I should be happy that my designs are introduced as the…
BINGO! I'm not sure if MDL articles like this are poorly written on purpose so as to leave the alleged "controversy," which may not be a controversy at all, in question, or if they are poorly written accidentally by untalented writers. The designs shown next to the runway models are clearly the sources for those designs, but those are not the designs in that background shot.
Also, I have to love that she claims these rather mundane, unremarkable sketches "are the lines and colors that I've drawn hundreds of times, erased, cut, and perfected," Spare me. Any first-year, uni design student could have done as well or better. There is nothing remarkable about those drawings.
But never let details like accuracy and questions of whether a given situation even matters or not stop "netizens" and MDL from trying to make a giant something out of nothing. This is related to the general process by which Korean entertainers get their lives and character torn apart online over the tiniest of lame accusations and judgments made by people who contribute nothing of value to the world.
how disrespectful to not even bring up the minimum effort and ask to use the designs.
Show me where in the article it is proven or even mentioned, that the designs in the background are this woman's? The designs next to the runway models are clearly the source of those models' outfits, but they're not the ones in the still shot. If I were the director, I'd cut the one or two seconds from the show, or have someone whip out a few other fashion drawings to use. Who cares? This woman is getting free publicity.
A very polite form to say "We know we copy you, we didnt think the original designer would've noticed but now…
Show me where in the article it is shown/proven that the designs hanging in the background are those of this designer? The designs hanging and the ones shown next to the runway models are not the same. Standard, sloppy article-writing on MDL, leaving in question whether or not a "controversy" is based in reality or not.
They apologized because they get caught othewise they wouldn't care .Shame on them for stealing others hardwork.
What part of "1 or 2 seconds" don't you understand?
This sloppy article, like all sloppy articles on MDL, does not make clear if the designs hanging in the background are actually hers or not. The designs shown next to the runway models are obviously the sources for those pieces, but those aren't the designs shown in the background.
Sounds like another hysterical, whipped-up Netizen-style, faux controversy over nothing, of the type that Korea does so well.
Babe, just say you don't understand art....No one's judging you......😂😂😂
Yeah, well, the judging was pretty obvious. I'll live, though.
There's no validity to a blanket statement that someone does or does not "understand art." There are 500 billion different pieces of art of all kinds in this world. The statement that one "understands" them all is what's absurd.
It's also absurd to assume that because someone is "in university" as an arts major, they "understand art." But then, you're incredibly young, so it's expected that you spout hilariously naive/pompous blather like that. Except, I'm pretty sure I already knew such statements were pompous blather when I was your age.
As for what English literature might have to say regarding this piece of garbage, it's simpler and more accurate to say this is an example of absurdly bad writing, and leave it at that.
1 
1 
7.6 is WAY higher than this thing deserves.
It's telling that you say nothing good about the show except that it's "actually, really good," "people are smoking crack," "like come on now..." Those aren't positive assessments of anything in the show, just bland assertions and insults aimed at people with discernment.
I love New, but he needs to escape from Thailand because 99% of what comes out of there is crap. Maybe learn Korean and Japanese; try to get some exposure there.
Dropped. 1/10
Also...where is all this sex and nudity you're claiming to see on American TV? I assume you're talking about premium channels, because there is next to no sex and nudity on American broadcast television. Please send me some links so I can enjoy all this hot sex you're talking about.
This idiotic comment is SO MDL.
"Korean" is a ethnicity/nationality, not a race, you dunce.
My reference to being "Korean" is to the sad, Korean/Netizen habit of making up/believing/expanding on/spreading bullshit lies and rumors and innuendos online, which often lead to the Korean celebrity being attacked, whoever they may be, and there have been a lot of them, freaking killing themselves as a result.
Do you deny this is all too frequent an occurrence in Korea, or are you OK with it? If you agree it's a problem, then I guess you're a "racist" too.
I'm American. America has far more guns within its borders than people. That's a fact. We have mass shootings almost every day here. It's horrible. But in your little head, it would be "racist" of me to point that out because, you know, "American" is a "race," right? Just like "Korean" is.
I don't have to mention this, but I will because it's true: MOST of my favorite films, dramas, music, actors and singers live in Korea. They are "Korean," which in your tiny mind makes me a terrible "racist."
The Japanese to some degree, still secretly fancy themselves a superior "race" compared to Koreans and Han Chinese. However, there is less than a ONE PERCENT genetic difference between either one of these three groups and the other two.
"Korean" is an ethnicity, not a race, child. I'll let you google what that means.
This is one of the best things that ever happened to her.
You're also the Korean Netizen here using a non-existent, plural form of the word "evidence." There is no such word as "evidences." Only bad Korean-to-English translators write "evidences." I see it all the time in bad subtitles. Do you write those too?
You're probably also one of the Korean Netizens who enjoy hounding celebrities to suicide by making a big deal out of shit that either didn't happen or is none of your business. The "evidences" here are clear: You need a life.
Why do you??????????????????
I am a full-time artist and writer. I know exactly what I am talking about.
Your broadly presumptuous comment naturally ignores one of my main points: There is NO evidence in this article that the illustrations shown in that background shot are, in fact, the designer's. As I've already said twice, but have to repeat for slow readers like you, maybe they ARE, maybe they AREN'T, this article does not provide anything other than the designer's claim. It is a lazy, sloppily-written piece of junk journalism, which is why it's on MDL's front page.
The drawings next to the runway models, assuming they were made by the complaining designer, are NOT the ones in the background shot. And the designer herself says they were used in no other way but to hang there for two seconds, max.
Furthermore, even if the drawings ARE hers, and let's assume they are, so freaking what? She wrote the producers about it, they did whatever to satisfy her demands, and that was that. But yet, here we are, with this article and people like you, trying to act like this is some huge deal.
My guess is some lazy prop person copied them off the Internet and hung them there, never dreaming anyone would give a shit for a two second shot, or that anyone would notice. That person has doubtless been yelled at, and/or fired. OK, so...what?
It's the idea that this tempest in a teapot is featured as a big deal in a front- page MDL story AFTER it's already been dealt with, and people like you are jumping up and down pretending to be all outraged, that's ridiculous.
I encourage you to get a life.
Your out-of-left-field implication, supported by NOTHING here, is a classic example of how rumors and innuendos and big nothing-burgers get turned into major controversies by irresponsible, anonymous netizen-writers like yourself.
What really pisses me off, and maybe you haven't noticed it, but MDL NEVER features articles, headlines, or anything else related to gay-themed films, series, or BLs on the front page. Like...EVER.
I have written the mods three different times at three different addresses, asking why this is the case and to please correct me if I'm wrong. As MDL does with everything else they simply don't want to acknowledge, my messages, all very polite, have been entirely ignored.
There is a clear anti-gay bias among the management of MDL. Perhaps they are afraid an article about a gay movie or actor on the front page might cause a mass exodus of members. Who knows?
Why are you so eager to believe what this woman says, Karla?
I'm not even saying she's lying, Karla. I'm saying this article is a slop-fest and provides no basis for what this woman is saying...Karla.
Did you hear that "Karen" is a thing of some kind here in the U.S. and are trying to apply the meme to seem "with it," even though you're failing by using it randomly and stupidly? Or are you an American who STILL doesn't understand the meaning of the meme "Karen," despite living here?
Actually, there is no "Karen" in this situation, unless maybe it's MDL, sloppily attempting to make a mountain out of a molehill...Karla.
Also, I have to love that she claims these rather mundane, unremarkable sketches "are the lines and colors that I've drawn hundreds of times, erased, cut, and perfected," Spare me. Any first-year, uni design student could have done as well or better. There is nothing remarkable about those drawings.
But never let details like accuracy and questions of whether a given situation even matters or not stop "netizens" and MDL from trying to make a giant something out of nothing. This is related to the general process by which Korean entertainers get their lives and character torn apart online over the tiniest of lame accusations and judgments made by people who contribute nothing of value to the world.
This sloppy article, like all sloppy articles on MDL, does not make clear if the designs hanging in the background are actually hers or not. The designs shown next to the runway models are obviously the sources for those pieces, but those aren't the designs shown in the background.
Sounds like another hysterical, whipped-up Netizen-style, faux controversy over nothing, of the type that Korea does so well.
There's no validity to a blanket statement that someone does or does not "understand art." There are 500 billion different pieces of art of all kinds in this world. The statement that one "understands" them all is what's absurd.
It's also absurd to assume that because someone is "in university" as an arts major, they "understand art." But then, you're incredibly young, so it's expected that you spout hilariously naive/pompous blather like that. Except, I'm pretty sure I already knew such statements were pompous blather when I was your age.
As for what English literature might have to say regarding this piece of garbage, it's simpler and more accurate to say this is an example of absurdly bad writing, and leave it at that.
1/10