etoks21

I'm bored. Dropping halfway.

1/10

Your inability to perceive my "handicapped" remark as snark, explains your inability to understand the story being presented in this BL as well.

Just because a character says something does not mean it is true. I choose to interpret "gay for you only" in BL as the character being in denial, simply because such a thing is not possible. If the same character told his lover "last night while you were asleep, I flew to the moon and back on the gossamer wings of a golden-haired fairy," would you interpret that to mean such a trip actually took place? I know I wouldn't.

Furthermore, the "straight-to-gay" silliness in BL has been on its way out of the genre over the last couple of years. This show being in the upper tier of BL story-telling in so many other ways, I doubt the writers are going to try to convince us of that moronic trope as part of its arc.

But you believe what you need to believe.

Where did I say we live in a "gay utopia?" Where did I even imply such a thing? I didn't.

You're inability to see that Qian is either aware and in denial about Yuan's feelings OR he's mentally handicapped, is not my issue to fix. See or don't see what you want.

Work on your reading comprehension. Nowhere above did I say that was NOT what Qian is saying in the fishing scene. What I DID say is his assertion is a form of homophobia.

I'm not responsible for your inability to see what is right in front of you regarding the fact that Qian is aware but in denial about Yuan's feelings for him. If he isn't, he is incredibly stupid, and that's not the case so there you have it.

No, he does not "become" gay. No one "becomes" gay. They are either already gay and in the closet or in denial, or they're not. Do some research.

No, I have not said infidelity is "justifiable." That is your word.

Infidelity is often "understandable" however, given the circumstances and human nature. No one else needs to "justify" their infidelity to you. Or are you some kind of officially, appointed Cheating Judge in a Court of Adultery?

No one "becomes" gay. Either the potential is there or it isn't.

Age of sexual consent here is 16. There's nothing "problematic" going on unless you choose to pretend there is which, I guess you do.

blah blah blah...got it.

Be gentle. You might cause some of the MDL prude-heads here to explode.

At what point does an "age-gap" become "problematic?" How do you define that term?

I'll just repeat myself: "The self-righteous judgmentalism on MDL continues to amaze."

Are you saying Qian will "become" gay?

I'll assume you're saying incest IS serious (I never said it wasn't "serious," I asked a question) if there is no reproduction, but you don't say why.

So...why? If two hearts and souls find love, and there is ZERO chance of multi-headed offspring, why is such a relationship forbidden? Especially considering how rare such a case would be?

I didn't say anything about incest's "purpose" either. So yeah..."incest does remain incest." I didn't say incest was baseball, or anything other than what it is, so I've no idea what that's supposed to mean.

So your "social values" include the profound statement that "incest is incest," like baseball is baseball. OK, I guess that's supposed to be deep or something, but it's not.

Your reply reminds me of when I was a child and I asked questions of my mom about why this or why that. And finally, having run out of logical explanations she'd say "...because I said so!" or "...it just IS!," both of which were clear admissions she had no idea at all "why" she was saying or doing anything I asked about.

lol For some reason, my browser doesn't allow emoticons here but imagine 20 laughing ones in this reply to you. The response to the show I describe would be delicious.

Arrogance, condescension, and stupidity are a poisonous combination. This comment is an excellent example of that.

It's hilarious that you start your lengthy comment by announcing how "tedious" (after two relatively brief replies, you're exhausted by the effort of reading them and being challenged!) this all is to you. Then, you write a lengthy comment detailing the three qualities I listed above, despite claiming this is all such a dreary bore for you to do. lol

I don't care if you're offended by something I wrote, I hope you are. That pleases me. You're a poseur and you'll not get another wasted moment out of me.

Could you point out for me the MDL rule stating that you are allowed to respond only to commenters who immediately wrote to you? Thanks, I'll wait.

I don't care if you weren't "talking to me." I reply to whomever I want. Every comment on this page is the business of every other commenter on this thread, should they choose to make it so.

I'm often "triggered" by a******s.

I agree with your first statement above...your first comment was fine and I agreed with almost all of it. It was only after that you went into full-on douche bag mode. Thus, I responded accordingly.

You're welcome.

You're not very intelligent.
Hamas is hiding and fighting from in, around, under, and above Gazan civilians. International laws of war clearly state that when that is the case the places they are hiding become legitimate targets. This is on Hamas, and all the Gazans who knew good and well where many of the entrances to those tunnels and stashes of weapons have been for many years. Hamas didn't build 300 miles of tunnels overnight.

Again, you're not very intelligent. Since October 7th, when Hamas started this, no more than 20,000 Gazan civilians have been killed. That's less than 1% of the 2.3 MILLION population in six months. Yet, you screech hysterically that Israel is trying to kill "EVERY PERSON IN THE GAZA STRIP." lol If they're trying to kill all Gazans, they would simply start mowing them down with machine guns everywhere they see them.

Israel has existed for 75 years, and is NEVER going away. Get used to it. And I don't come to MDL to argue with uninformed Jew-haters, so I'll be deleting any further replies from you without reading them.

You think in black/white terms, so I'm not going to waste time engaging with you. I did not "scream 'He is homophobic.;" I very calmly explained how his stated position IS homophobic, whether he realizes it or not.

Throughout your reply, you put words in my mouth I didn't say and then respond to them. I won't be participating in your imaginary conversation.