If I want to see The Towering Inferno I can watch the original 1974 one that had a very serious cast too. Steve McQueen, Paul Newman, William Holden . Faye Dunaway, Robert Vaughn, Robert Wagner, Richard Chamberlain .
When are we going to watch "In the Wake" on streaming platforms? I'm asking because I'm more than certain that this movie is not going to be released at my country's cinemas.
I've only seen the Japanese remake and it's pretty good. I wanted to watch this one first but as I played the…
They leave on the server the lower resolution version of older movies in order to save the server's bandwidth for the newer ones that are available in HD. That is why you can't find older movies in resolution higher than 480p or more.
No one is defending him. Most of those who seem to you like they are defending him. disagree with the cancel revenge…
I bet that if he wasn't a celebrity she wouldn't bother to make that much fuss in public about the abortion. She would have done it either way when she told her that he didn't want to get married. This is the classic behavior a woman who wants to force a guy to marry her by using an accidental pregnancy as an excuse. But accidental pregnancies my dear girls and ladies and whatever is your age, is women's problem. By the time that us, women, are those who get more affected by having a child that we are not able perhaps to support, we must be those who should be more careful. There are a load of contraception ways out there available from the street kiosks to the pharmacies, prescribed or not ... use them if you don't want to have a baby and you feel that you are not on the appropriate age to have one, or you are unable to support it or whatever other reason. And in case you do want to have a baby, then choose a guy who is willing and interested to have one too. If you are indeed emancipated, as most of you claim that you are, take responsibility of what you do on and with your body, and whatever your body can produce. Children are not accessories and should not be "accidents".
ETA. Abortions harm women's reproductive system too. So it is better to be safe than sorry.
This movie doesn't make that much sense because the statute of limitations is not just 2 years, so Lee Doo Suk wouldn't be able to confess into his book that he slit the throat of the tavern woman just two years earlier. along with the face of the detective. These two had not yet expired on 2007. Also Lee Doo Suk looks too young to have committed the first crimes 15 years ago from 2007 backwards a.k.a starting on 1992. How old he was then?? Twelve??
As a woman and a mother, it disgusts me that you choose to side with him. He forced her into giving up her child…
As a woman and a mother you should felt ashamed for this woman who chose to abort her child in order to marry the celebrity guy. And when she didn't achieve this she decided to come out anonymously - she is such a coward- and destroy his career. This is IMO bullying of the worst kind. It is the application of the dogma "my way or the highway". That is what it is. Cancel culture in its worst.
I feel sad for the people defending him. They have lost their idol. He was not what he represented onscreen.I…
No one is defending him. Most of those who seem to you like they are defending him. disagree with the cancel revenge culture. If this woman who cowardly and anonymously publicized their personal affair didn't want to get pregnant by him, he would have used the appropriate contraceptive method in order to avoid it. If she wanted to keep her baby she wouldn't have accept his money and she wouldn't have proceed to the abortion. But claimed without any shame that he promised to her to marry her and that is how she decided to abort the baby. So her moral compass was unborn baby vs celebrity husband...!
Now if she cared about him and she indeed love him, she wouldn't attempt to destroy his career, in other words take away from him the means to make a income. But her behavior looks to me as the classic behavior of a woman who uses her ability to have children in order to trap a celebrity guy into a marriage.
How could he sue him for her unwanted pregnancy? Or because he dumped her? lol If for one thing it needs two people…
I -as a woman - have to say that I'm sick an tired by those women who use their pregnancies as a way to marry their bfs. It is sneaky, it is immature, and unfair for their children too. When a guy tells you that he doesn't want to have children with you, take it as a fact and move on, because he will not be a good husband for you and a good father for the children you have forced him to have with you. There are no contracts in relationships and the best relationships and families are those who are made by people who love each other and have freely the will to move to something more. The rest are revengeful bs.
sooooooo he made her get an abortion. idk about y'all but i can't really pretend he's a nice person after that.edit:…
There is no such thing as a forced or manipulated abortion. Any woman that has the slightest respect to her self wouldn't abort a baby she wanted to keep in order to get married with the guy who told her clearly that he didn't want this baby and in expanse children with her. Her priorities - marriage with the celebrity guy vs baby - are completely wrong. And her reaction is also completely wrong. Bring down the ex celebrity boyfriend because he didn't marry her. Any woman that gives credits to her shameful behavior doesn't worth to be a mother because children are not objects/tools to have them when we need them and abort them in order to marry a man, whatever this man is. A celebrity or a not.
Why shouldn't we defend him? Because some unknown A claims something in public? Anyone can claim anything in public…
As I have already said on another comment that is what cancel culture does. He was forced to publish an apology in order to prevent further damage from the controversy and the online gossip. There is no guilt for not have the will to be in an affair with any person and there is not guilt for not wanting to have children with this same person. As I said on another comment in order to have a child you need two people and no contraception. There are no excuses for unwanted pregnancies nowadays and particularly in first world countries. Same applies to the abortions. A woman that doesn't want to have an abortion has every right to keep her baby. In other words claiming that someone forced you to have an abortion is pure bs. If you want to keep your baby you can keep it and take this way the responsibility for your own actions too. The lack of contraception. We, the women, can't claim that we are truly emancipated when we don't want to take the responsibility of what we do with and on our bodies. What sort of emancipation is there when we don't protect ourselves from unwanted pregnancies or we do the opposite. We get pregnant in order to force a guy to marry us? Is this a responsible and adult behavior that would be beneficial in the long run for the unborn child too? Or is it an adult behavior to ruin the life , the career and the income of your ex with anonymous and vague allegations?
While this has been a nasty piece of business altogether, I can't help but feel that KSH isn't the only one to…
How could he sue him for her unwanted pregnancy? Or because he dumped her? lol If for one thing it needs two people to have a child. Two and no contraception. Now can someone explain to me why any woman who doesn't want to get pregnant from her bf doesn't protect herself ( that will be the most affected in case of an unwanted pregnancy ) to avoid it? Is S. Korea any kind of third world country that lacks of contraceptive methods perhaps? But even that is the case and let's say that woman gets eventually pregnant and she wants to keep the baby, how can someone force her to have an abortion? Did this guy grubbed her from her hair and dragged her to a clinic or something? And why this unknown A came forward just now to cry out that he left her pregnant and "forced" her to have an abortion anonymously and with vague insinuations? Why now and not then when it happened? My point is that the revenge and cancel culture has gone too far and it has to stop right now. I don't know who this guy is but I will defend him no matter what because the behavior of this unknown A is sneaky, toxic and wrong from all points of view.
Why shouldn't we defend him? Because some unknown A claims something in public? Anyone can claim anything in public anonymously. I can claim that you killed my mother and you know very well that you can't prove the contrary. Should you lose your job, your income and your reputation because I said so?
That is what cancel culture does. Forces someone to apologize for vague and anonymous allegations. The "K' and the "A" split and he feels obliged to apologize in order to avoid further damage.
If it was me I would have sued each and everyone of those who insinuated that the "K" referred to me, including the unknown and coward "A" who didn't have the guts to come forward and make the allegations with facts and names.
But if she did so, she would then have to prove that she was indeed in an affair with him, and indeed pregnant by him etc something that is not so convenient as spreading anonymously rumors against someone who is the most vulnerable to these rumors due to his fame.
I'm asking because I'm more than certain that this movie is not going to be released at my country's cinemas.
This is the classic behavior a woman who wants to force a guy to marry her by using an accidental pregnancy as an excuse.
But accidental pregnancies my dear girls and ladies and whatever is your age, is women's problem. By the time that us, women, are those who get more affected by having a child that we are not able perhaps to support, we must be those who should be more careful.
There are a load of contraception ways out there available from the street kiosks to the pharmacies, prescribed or not ... use them if you don't want to have a baby and you feel that you are not on the appropriate age to have one, or you are unable to support it or whatever other reason.
And in case you do want to have a baby, then choose a guy who is willing and interested to have one too.
If you are indeed emancipated, as most of you claim that you are, take responsibility of what you do on and with your body, and whatever your body can produce. Children are not accessories and should not be "accidents".
ETA. Abortions harm women's reproductive system too. So it is better to be safe than sorry.
Also Lee Doo Suk looks too young to have committed the first crimes 15 years ago from 2007 backwards a.k.a starting on 1992. How old he was then?? Twelve??
This is IMO bullying of the worst kind. It is the application of the dogma "my way or the highway".
That is what it is. Cancel culture in its worst.
If this woman who cowardly and anonymously publicized their personal affair didn't want to get pregnant by him, he would have used the appropriate contraceptive method in order to avoid it.
If she wanted to keep her baby she wouldn't have accept his money and she wouldn't have proceed to the abortion. But claimed without any shame that he promised to her to marry her and that is how she decided to abort the baby.
So her moral compass was unborn baby vs celebrity husband...!
Now if she cared about him and she indeed love him, she wouldn't attempt to destroy his career, in other words take away from him the means to make a income.
But her behavior looks to me as the classic behavior of a woman who uses her ability to have children in order to trap a celebrity guy into a marriage.
When a guy tells you that he doesn't want to have children with you, take it as a fact and move on, because he will not be a good husband for you and a good father for the children you have forced him to have with you.
There are no contracts in relationships and the best relationships and families are those who are made by people who love each other and have freely the will to move to something more.
The rest are revengeful bs.
Her priorities - marriage with the celebrity guy vs baby - are completely wrong.
And her reaction is also completely wrong. Bring down the ex celebrity boyfriend because he didn't marry her.
Any woman that gives credits to her shameful behavior doesn't worth to be a mother because children are not objects/tools to have them when we need them and abort them in order to marry a man, whatever this man is. A celebrity or a not.
There is no guilt for not have the will to be in an affair with any person and there is not guilt for not wanting to have children with this same person.
As I said on another comment in order to have a child you need two people and no contraception.
There are no excuses for unwanted pregnancies nowadays and particularly in first world countries. Same applies to the abortions. A woman that doesn't want to have an abortion has every right to keep her baby. In other words claiming that someone forced you to have an abortion is pure bs. If you want to keep your baby you can keep it and take this way the responsibility for your own actions too. The lack of contraception.
We, the women, can't claim that we are truly emancipated when we don't want to take the responsibility of what we do with and on our bodies. What sort of emancipation is there when we don't protect ourselves from unwanted pregnancies or we do the opposite. We get pregnant in order to force a guy to marry us?
Is this a responsible and adult behavior that would be beneficial in the long run for the unborn child too? Or is it an adult behavior to ruin the life , the career and the income of your ex with anonymous and vague allegations?
If for one thing it needs two people to have a child. Two and no contraception.
Now can someone explain to me why any woman who doesn't want to get pregnant from her bf doesn't protect herself ( that will be the most affected in case of an unwanted pregnancy ) to avoid it?
Is S. Korea any kind of third world country that lacks of contraceptive methods perhaps?
But even that is the case and let's say that woman gets eventually pregnant and she wants to keep the baby, how can someone force her to have an abortion? Did this guy grubbed her from her hair and dragged her to a clinic or something?
And why this unknown A came forward just now to cry out that he left her pregnant and "forced" her to have an abortion anonymously and with vague insinuations? Why now and not then when it happened?
My point is that the revenge and cancel culture has gone too far and it has to stop right now.
I don't know who this guy is but I will defend him no matter what because the behavior of this unknown A is sneaky, toxic and wrong from all points of view.
Anyone can claim anything in public anonymously. I can claim that you killed my mother and you know very well that you can't prove the contrary. Should you lose your job, your income and your reputation because I said so?
If it was me I would have sued each and everyone of those who insinuated that the "K" referred to me, including the unknown and coward "A" who didn't have the guts to come forward and make the allegations with facts and names.
But if she did so, she would then have to prove that she was indeed in an affair with him, and indeed pregnant by him etc something that is not so convenient as spreading anonymously rumors against someone who is the most vulnerable to these rumors due to his fame.