I think it was on Dramacool, but I checked and it's not available now. They lost most of their movies and dramas few weeks ago after a massive shutdown of their servers unfortunately. Sorry. :/
Seeing how they managed to make one version without including nudity, it seems like the nude scenes are unnecessary…
Much like all the shirtless scenes of actors in the dramas you watched and seemed to like very much.
At some point, people need to stop being so hypocrite. If nudity was such a big problem for you, you shouldn't be okay and rate so high all the dramas in your watched list, because they all have at least one, totally useless, shirtless scene from a actor of the cast, if not more.
First of all, that's only your personal opinion, so you can add a "I think" or "In my opinion" to your "phrase", which would need a final point, majuscule and other grammar rules to really be a phrase too. And next, I don't understand the point of this tentative of communication if you don't give any explanation to your opinion or accompany it with arguments or examples. If you had a bad day and just wanted to shoot something "mean" to feel better, I hope it is the case, otherwise, mind your own business because I really don't see the point of doing that if you can't even make a proper phrase to communicate with other human beings. Your four words look like a vain three-years-old kid tantrum.
Muto Jun is... quite fine ! If Matsumoto Hiroki would have played the character of "Nakarai Sei" they would have been a total feast for the eyes together. The first episode is interesting.
Jang Hyuk and a sageuk ? That's a perfect match and a good sign of a serious and (very) good sageuk. The plot is also very interesting, I'm looking forward to it.
I enjoy the overall performance, and especially Choo Young Woo's one, but the story and its development over the episodes is a total nonsense for a sageuk unfortunately.
Unless you have proofs of your claims, this is defamation.
That's not a proof, they are only allegations from online forums, without evidence that this person is really Yu Shi (maybe it's him, maybe not, if it's a maybe, that's no an evidence). So it is defamation.
People can believe whatever they want, but if you claim publicly something about someone without concretes proofs that your claim is true, this is just defamation, which is a legal offence.
And considering this was from thirteen years ago (!), even if there was proof it was Yu Shi when he was a teenager, how petty and sad in their own lives people must be to just spread hate on someone for young misbehaviours during their teens just to try to damage their success nowadays. In my opinion, this behaviour is worse than the one they condemn.
From a Korean website, to check the number, but he mentioned it in a promotional or behind the scenes video for "Let Free the Curse of Taekwondo" I guess, as him, Kim Nu Rim and Jang Yeon Woo too, are all above 1,8m. But I don't remember which video exactly. I would have to watch them again for that. ^^
I avoided Ro Woon's sageuk so far, as they were exactly the kind of sageuk I really dislike, but this one looks interesting so I'll give it a try. And it's the first sageuk I can watched on Disney+, which produced very good Korean dramas, so I look forward to it (even if it's not before several months).
Yup, but unfortunately the reality was even worse. :(In the end, no one was good or bad, but were pushed by norms…
"In the end, no one was good or bad, but were pushed by norms and greed for power of that time."
In my opinion this kind of statement is some of the worst of relativism. Of course there were bad or good people, just like today, and same in the future. Put all the blame on the "society", the norms, is too easy, and totally exonerate people of their actions.
I haven't watched a good sageuk since "Knight Flower" one year ago. All the sageuk in 2024 were disappointing for different reasons for me (the current "Check in Hanyang" is your usual garbage sageuk that just put a standard rom/com story in an historical settings, and "The Tale of Lady Ok", despite having interesting points, is also all over the place when it comes to accurate historical portrayal of the period it is set in). So I have high hopes for this one, even though I already have doubts considering these events and characters are some of the most viewed in sageuk over the decades and there seems to be a very modern point of view over it just from the initial plot.
Here’s why and how the entire dialogue was mistranslated by Netflix:There are two ways to understand the sentence,…
I haven't watched the drama, so I lack the full context of the dialogue, however I like a little intellectual debate.
In Korean "무장 세력", the armed forces, that you translated as militants, refers usually (but not always) to armed forces that are not official army forces (군대). So it may not be used here for soldiers of the regular army of the country. It is often used in Korean newspapers (that I read), for terrorists and independent armed groups just like the ones that run (and terrorise) in Middle East, so I'm totally not sure there is mistranslation here. Maybe yes, maybe not.
I didn't even watch the drama, and don't plan to, but I'm glad it pissed off all the terrorists and fanatics supporters that pretend to fight against injustice.
When your indignation is selective, it isn't worth much.
1 
And I want to see Nat Chen play the main role of a drama or a movie soon, whatever the genre or the story.
At some point, people need to stop being so hypocrite. If nudity was such a big problem for you, you shouldn't be okay and rate so high all the dramas in your watched list, because they all have at least one, totally useless, shirtless scene from a actor of the cast, if not more.
The first episode is interesting.
People can believe whatever they want, but if you claim publicly something about someone without concretes proofs that your claim is true, this is just defamation, which is a legal offence.
And considering this was from thirteen years ago (!), even if there was proof it was Yu Shi when he was a teenager, how petty and sad in their own lives people must be to just spread hate on someone for young misbehaviours during their teens just to try to damage their success nowadays. In my opinion, this behaviour is worse than the one they condemn.
In my opinion this kind of statement is some of the worst of relativism. Of course there were bad or good people, just like today, and same in the future. Put all the blame on the "society", the norms, is too easy, and totally exonerate people of their actions.
In Korean "무장 세력", the armed forces, that you translated as militants, refers usually (but not always) to armed forces that are not official army forces (군대). So it may not be used here for soldiers of the regular army of the country. It is often used in Korean newspapers (that I read), for terrorists and independent armed groups just like the ones that run (and terrorise) in Middle East, so I'm totally not sure there is mistranslation here. Maybe yes, maybe not.
When your indignation is selective, it isn't worth much.