the whole lot of them tried to gain access into sae ron's IG, and they had a list of sae ron supporters' accounts…
what was going on inside their cute minds? all of their shenanigans just made people to lose their respect for them even further. their actions reflected back to their HiGhEsT pAiD sTaR.
all of those neutral 🏖️⛱️ worked so hard playing the victim card for his sake, even used her name to defend their opinion about him and preached about humanity only for these sWeET fans to place themselves as the villain once again.
KSH's fans dragging Lee Sun Kyun's name into this mess is simply wrong and outrageous.Lee Sun Kyun doesn't deserved…
isn't lee jinho the one who made continuous report against the late lee sun kyun? are they not doing a proper research using his name to defend their opinion about a man lee jinho supported?
I actually want to he did one sin that he dated a minor but by Korean law it's not crime they had a breakup 4…
I think we need to see it objectively that kim Saeron's mother and family don't wish upon his death, that's what matter.
some people have taken it out of control and I don't agree with them. but if you see it that way, on the other side, some people still sl*t shaming her even after she no longer here. both have their ugly sides.
and the late sulli's brother voiced the matter, he has the right to do that.
he's still given a chance by saeron's family even until this day btw. they won't drop the inevitable evidence for now because they still want his apology and knowing that it will end his career if they do that.
I appreciate that he defended himself on the press conference, but he made it about himself and didn't really give clear answer nor evidence to defend that he's not guilty.
I actually want to he did one sin that he dated a minor but by Korean law it's not crime they had a breakup 4…
it's not normal for a celebrity to get hate at that amount of level because of that tho. at that time lee jinho fueled the public's outrage with the defamation against her. all of her personal moves being talked to the public from getting a part time job etc, and they twisted the reality. imo that wasn't normal.
even kim soo hyun himself acknowledged that when he denied it, it made the situation hard for her. but he'd made the same decision either way, to protect himself. the part of protecting the drama I can understand because he tried to save everyone else behind the production but you can't deny that he couldn't handle the the situation better, they made her into a liar.
no, I was referring to the denial about her posting their picture while the drama was airing.
one particular user in this thread is really getting under my skin, acting like their "neutrality" is some sort…
I gave them a little the benefit of the doubt at first when they claimed that they defended saeron when she received hates back then. however the more they talked the more it proved otherwise.
me neither. some users I've seen that later ended up taking a side never claimed to be neutral before even tho they might didn't agree with some of our opinions. and most of those claimed to be neutral weirdly only judging kim saeron's side. in the same paragraph of their "I'm neutral but..." usually they shade netizens who supported kim saeron or kim saeron's family.
one particular user in this thread is really getting under my skin, acting like their "neutrality" is some sort…
I think I know which user you're referring too. I've blocked them when I realised they were actually not what they were claiming to be.
when I said how ironic that people use kim saeron's d*eath as a tool to defend their opinion about the man, they came with the logic "yes, how ironic it is that he had annulled her debt, blah blah blah blah but now her family is tearing him down."
the biggest LOL
and when you explained things from a to z about the matter, they did not respond, they skipped all the important details and only respond to one point with mind-blowing excuses for someone who claimed to be neutral.
you're right, they're not actually defending her nor him, they're just defending their ego.
So I reported to the mdl support and they said that comments getting proceeded when they met with the threshold and triggered review the system. Are you familiar with the criteria to trigger the system?
When discussing about the potential victim of grooming allegation, by not picking a side you're picking a side.
The more people silent about this and not giving a chance to listen to the potential victim's side, the more the issue will not be getting addressed to the surface.
Just like how you give the benefit of the doubt that it could be false, the other scenario is that it could be right. If you give the benefit of the doubt to the alleged oppressor, why not give the same chance to the alleged victim too?
Wow KSR haters are REALLY devoted to stalking us,Now they reported a comment I made LAST YEAR 💀I don't even…
they stalked you through your watching list. since we've confirmed that we have secret admirers even though we've blocked them. let's talk about it more. let them be our audiences, we know our words reach them somehow.
"The heated debates between netizens and Kim Soo Hyun supporters continue online"https://www.koreaboo.com/news/kim-soo-hyun-advert-seoul-outrage/>>>>>Even…
when they're calling people haters, couldn't it get reported too?
all of those neutral 🏖️⛱️ worked so hard playing the victim card for his sake, even used her name to defend their opinion about him and preached about humanity only for these sWeET fans to place themselves as the villain once again.
some people have taken it out of control and I don't agree with them. but if you see it that way, on the other side, some people still sl*t shaming her even after she no longer here. both have their ugly sides.
and the late sulli's brother voiced the matter, he has the right to do that.
he's still given a chance by saeron's family even until this day btw. they won't drop the inevitable evidence for now because they still want his apology and knowing that it will end his career if they do that.
I appreciate that he defended himself on the press conference, but he made it about himself and didn't really give clear answer nor evidence to defend that he's not guilty.
you can censore with ni**les or with apples or pineapples
linger*e
pan+TIES
because a certain user is trying to find everyone's fault that doesn't agree with them with mass reporting comment using their burner accounts.
even kim soo hyun himself acknowledged that when he denied it, it made the situation hard for her. but he'd made the same decision either way, to protect himself. the part of protecting the drama I can understand because he tried to save everyone else behind the production but you can't deny that he couldn't handle the the situation better, they made her into a liar.
no, I was referring to the denial about her posting their picture while the drama was airing.
me neither. some users I've seen that later ended up taking a side never claimed to be neutral before even tho they might didn't agree with some of our opinions. and most of those claimed to be neutral weirdly only judging kim saeron's side. in the same paragraph of their "I'm neutral but..." usually they shade netizens who supported kim saeron or kim saeron's family.
when I said how ironic that people use kim saeron's d*eath as a tool to defend their opinion about the man, they came with the logic "yes, how ironic it is that he had annulled her debt, blah blah blah blah but now her family is tearing him down."
the biggest LOL
and when you explained things from a to z about the matter, they did not respond, they skipped all the important details and only respond to one point with mind-blowing excuses for someone who claimed to be neutral.
you're right, they're not actually defending her nor him, they're just defending their ego.
So I reported to the mdl support and they said that comments getting proceeded when they met with the threshold and triggered review the system. Are you familiar with the criteria to trigger the system?
The more people silent about this and not giving a chance to listen to the potential victim's side, the more the issue will not be getting addressed to the surface.
Just like how you give the benefit of the doubt that it could be false, the other scenario is that it could be right. If you give the benefit of the doubt to the alleged oppressor, why not give the same chance to the alleged victim too?
since we've confirmed that we have secret admirers even though we've blocked them. let's talk about it more. let them be our audiences, we know our words reach them somehow.
however julisnow's comment about got taken down in less than 2 hours. while that comment we reported still remains.