The girl looks nice, but the guy doesn't. He's pretty average for an idol actor, but then I remember that Liu…
Plenty of men hate other men. That's kind of how wars start. And there aren't any men who are hated by both men & women alike? Seriously?!
If you're going to regurgitate 21st century liberal Western propaganda, at least try putting a little thought behind it. Oh, by the way, what does your propaganda say about non-binary or transgender persons or anyone else who doesn't identify with their cis genders? Whom do they hate & by whom are they hated (alike)?
And when you generalize that "women are hated by both men and women alike," are you speaking from personal experience, by any chance?
The girl looks nice, but the guy doesn't. He's pretty average for an idol actor, but then I remember that Liu…
How will Li Yun Rui ever sleep at night knowing that a "premier" beauty such as yourself think he's "pretty average" looking for a Chinese male lead (which means he's actually very handsome)!!
Just curious, what is the difference between "pretty average" and "average average?"
Apart from love in the clouds, there’s also the eternal fragrance. no idea when it’s gonna air tho it’s…
He's getting better.
He started out a fashion model exclusively, then moved on to martials arts type of dramas because he had martial arts training when he was a kid.
Unlike a lot of other C-drama MLs, he never formally studied film & theater at Beijing Film Academy, Shanghai Theatre Academy, The Central Academy of Drama & the like.
Edited to add: he was fine in Go Ahead, but the role fit him well.
Pls recommend me some more cdramas like when destiny brings demon it was soooooooo goodd
Others will recommend more popular xianxia such as Love Between Fairy and Devil. So I'm going to offer a more hidden gem: The Starry Love.
Be patient and try & see at least 2 or 3 episodes before you make any judgment. The more you watch, the more you'll be pleasantly surprised by unexpected turns of events & character developments.
1) China has logical rationale behind their regulations;2) China has already has made, is making & will continue…
No worries, you weren't being rude. I wasn't insulted. I was just stating why I misinterpreted what you were saying originally.
As for your issue with the endings, I could suggest skipping them from now on. Easier said than done. Because by then, you've already invested too much to move on without knowing what finally happened.
1) China has logical rationale behind their regulations;2) China has already has made, is making & will continue…
Oh, I see what you're saying.
The part where you're (unnecessarily) shouting: "IS THIS A HAPPY ENDING? NO." kind of threw me off.
When you scream like that, people will tend to focus on your screaming and tune out the rest of what you're saying.
At the end of the day, aren't you contradicting yourself? On one hand, you assert that "china's [sic] regulations need to change or they will never make masterpieces cz of botched endings." But on the other, you suggest that "an extra episode for [explanation] would be a nice touch and it wouldn't be against their regulations."
So which is it? Both cannot be true.
If the former were true and that without "de-regulation," the ending could never be logically sound, then the latter which offers a quick & easy way to follow regulations & preserve the logical integrity of the ending is a nonsensical solution.
In turn, if the latter were true and there was a way to get around the regulations and still come up with endings that make logical sense, you just negated your former claim that China's regulations "NEED [my emphasis] to change."
china's regulations need to change or they will never make masterpieces cz of botched endings. At least this time…
1) China has logical rationale behind their regulations;
2) China has already has made, is making & will continue to make masterpieces;
3) Unless you are a Chinese citizen or a member of the Chinese diaspora, you aren't a part of either the core or the secondary target audiences, which would make you & your opinions completely irrelevant to the C-ent industry;
4) If "happy" endings were necessary (& sufficient) prerequisites for masterpiece status, kindly explain ancient Greek tragedies, Shakespearean tragedies (such as Romeo and Juliet), Victorian Gothic Era literature/period pieces, 19th Russian epics (such as Dostoyevsky & Tolstoy);
5) Last but not least, the C-ent industry preference for open endings is more historically & culturally (as opposed to politically) based due to the Chinese (Buddhist & Taoist- influenced) traditional belief in the duality of nature, life & reality itself. That there exists no happiness without sadness (& vice versa), that only by embracing & enduring life as a series of never-ending cycles of pain & suffering can one attain true meaning, value & fulfillment (this is not necessarily "happiness," which suggests an hedonistic element). Hence the saying "Eat Bitterness," for better or for worse.
If you still stubbornly insist on "happy" endings with unicorns, rainbows & ice cream with sprinkles on top, try My Little Pony or Hello Kitty or Barney the Purple Dinosaur for your entertainment viewing pleasure. Speaking of "purple," BTS will do as well.
1 
That's kind of how wars start. And there aren't any men who are hated by both men & women alike? Seriously?!
If you're going to regurgitate 21st century liberal Western propaganda, at least try putting a little thought behind it. Oh, by the way, what does your propaganda say about non-binary or transgender persons or anyone else who doesn't identify with their cis genders? Whom do they hate & by whom are they hated (alike)?
And when you generalize that "women are hated by both men and women alike," are you speaking from personal experience, by any chance?
Just curious, what is the difference between "pretty average" and "average average?"
Back From the Brink
He started out a fashion model exclusively, then moved on to martials arts type of dramas because he had martial arts training when he was a kid.
Unlike a lot of other C-drama MLs, he never formally studied film & theater at Beijing Film Academy, Shanghai Theatre Academy, The Central Academy of Drama & the like.
Edited to add: he was fine in Go Ahead, but the role fit him well.
A lot of people seem to prefer things to be spelled out for them, but I think that takes the fun out of it.
This time you'll likely observe things that you may have missed or didn't make much sense the first time around.
Be patient and try & see at least 2 or 3 episodes before you make any judgment. The more you watch, the more you'll be pleasantly surprised by unexpected turns of events & character developments.
As for your issue with the endings, I could suggest skipping them from now on. Easier said than done. Because by then, you've already invested too much to move on without knowing what finally happened.
The part where you're (unnecessarily) shouting: "IS THIS A HAPPY ENDING? NO." kind of threw me off.
When you scream like that, people will tend to focus on your screaming and tune out the rest of what you're saying.
At the end of the day, aren't you contradicting yourself? On one hand, you assert that "china's [sic] regulations need to change or they will never make masterpieces cz of botched endings." But on the other, you suggest that "an extra episode for [explanation] would be a nice touch and it wouldn't be against their regulations."
So which is it? Both cannot be true.
If the former were true and that without "de-regulation," the ending could never be logically sound, then the latter which offers a quick & easy way to follow regulations & preserve the logical integrity of the ending is a nonsensical solution.
In turn, if the latter were true and there was a way to get around the regulations and still come up with endings that make logical sense, you just negated your former claim that China's regulations "NEED [my emphasis] to change."
Talk about being unreasonable & making no sense.
2) China has already has made, is making & will continue to make masterpieces;
3) Unless you are a Chinese citizen or a member of the Chinese diaspora, you aren't a part of either the core or the secondary target audiences, which would make you & your opinions completely irrelevant to the C-ent industry;
4) If "happy" endings were necessary (& sufficient) prerequisites for masterpiece status, kindly explain ancient Greek tragedies, Shakespearean tragedies (such as Romeo and Juliet), Victorian Gothic Era literature/period pieces, 19th Russian epics (such as Dostoyevsky & Tolstoy);
5) Last but not least, the C-ent industry preference for open endings is more historically & culturally (as opposed to politically) based due to the Chinese (Buddhist & Taoist- influenced) traditional belief in the duality of nature, life & reality itself. That there exists no happiness without sadness (& vice versa), that only by embracing & enduring life as a series of never-ending cycles of pain & suffering can one attain true meaning, value & fulfillment (this is not necessarily "happiness," which suggests an hedonistic element). Hence the saying "Eat Bitterness," for better or for worse.
If you still stubbornly insist on "happy" endings with unicorns, rainbows & ice cream with sprinkles on top, try My Little Pony or Hello Kitty or Barney the Purple Dinosaur for your entertainment viewing pleasure. Speaking of "purple," BTS will do as well.