Details

  • Last Online: 6 hours ago
  • Location:
  • Contribution Points: 27 LV1
  • Roles:
  • Join Date: January 19, 2026
Cinderella Again japanese drama review
Completed
Cinderella Again
0 people found this review helpful
by strawberryeuphoria
6 days ago
10 of 10 episodes seen
Completed
Overall 4.0
Story 4.0
Acting/Cast 4.0
Music 5.5
Rewatch Value 3.0

easily forgettable

I went into Cinderella Again thinking it would be an emotional, nostalgic time-travel romance. The premise sounded interesting ;a woman getting the chance to go back and relive her youth, possibly correcting regrets and rediscovering love. That kind of storyline has so much potential for depth, reflection, and heartbreak.
But unfortunately, Cinderella Again didn’t work for me.
The biggest issue was the lack of emotional depth. Everything felt surface-level, the story, and the characters' motivations I kept waiting for something to truly move me, but it never did.
Then there’s the time-travel dynamic. Yes, physically she returns to her younger self, but mentally she is still 29 years old. Watching her develop romantic feelings for a 17-year-old felt uncomfortable to me. I couldn’t fully immerse myself in the romance because that awareness never disappears. Instead of feeling sweet or nostalgic, it felt strange.
The chemistry between the leads also wasn’t convincing. I didn’t feel that spark, that emotional tension or longing that makes you root for two people. It felt more like two actors following a script rather than two souls reconnecting across time.
As for the male lead, I’ve seen him in several BL dramas and other straight romances, and I know he can deliver strong performances. That’s why I was surprised that here his acting felt somewhat stiff and lacking flow. Maybe it was the direction, maybe the script, maybe the pairing, but something just didn’t click.
Of course, this is just my experience. I can see how some viewers might enjoy the nostalgia or the fantasy aspect. But for me, I simply couldn’t find it.
Was this review helpful to you?