Carry On Shaw
A relatively faithful adaptation of the Carry On humour, Carry On Doctors and Nurses sees the Shaw Brothers taking a stab at creating their own interpretation of the classic formula. It repeats many beats from the four hospital films of the classic British institution but mixes them up just enough not to seem like a direct riff on the same jokes, just with worse timing. While there are plenty of great moments of slapstick pratfalls and an equal dose of Hong Kong's brand of absurdist humour, the film fails to come together satisfactorily and contains too much dead air to tickle the funny bones. Anthony Chan's direction isn't terrible and does enough to keep the picture moving with a shot of surrealist horror. I admit to getting a good chuckle out of the exceptionally lengthy Ghostbusters parody, but other jokes tend to wear out their welcome very quickly, being milked to the point of powder. While Carry On Doctors and Nurses certainly isn't awful, it does feel rather tired, although the cast's bafoonery does elevate it above the realm of disposable.Was this review helpful to you?
Carry On Hotel
It's hilarious to me that the unequivocally British Carry On series was popular enough in Hong Kong to inspire its own set of exploitation films. Although Carry On Hotel doesn't really fit the vignette of that series and is as lightweight and inconsequential as they come, it still provides plenty of screwy all-star silliness and as many tonal mixes as something crafted by Wong Jing. As most of the stories are unrelated to one another, the film progresses without pausing for much unnecessary reflection or even explanation of what is happening, maintaining a comfortable pace to keep the proceedings moving without losing the viewer, however, director Jeffrey Lau struggles with consistency and pacing. We're merely expected to follow these numerous unimportant storylines while finding some form of entertainment in them. It seems that the presence of big stars and nonsensical comedy is meant to make everything all right, and it somehow does, ideal for spending a mellow afternoon with HK Cinema pals Eric Tsang, Cherie Chung, Joey Wong, Richard Ng, Cecilia Yip and Jacky Cheung. Unlike bigger and more ponderous all-star comedies, Carry on Hotel never attempts anything other than strange comedy and brief, amusing asides, a fluffy affair that can be suitably diverting, especially if watching these likeable stars engage in silly pratfalls is your idea of a good time.Was this review helpful to you?
Where simple storytelling draws you in
For the record, I don't give out 10 star ratings lightly. In fact, I think this is my first one on this site.Liway isn't particularly intricate in its storytelling or production. It tells the story of a couple of freedom fighters who are imprisoned with their two kids under the Marcos regime. But its simplicity is Liway's greatest strength.
The plain storytelling works so well for two reasons. One, the characters are rich and tactile. The actors do an incredible job in demonstrating what make each character tick, their fears, and their raison d'être. It makes them feel incredibly human and incredibly real.
And thus reason two: the story is a true one. The punch of this really follows through in the epilogue and credits where the connections between the film and real life are made explicit. I already knew about the big reveal at the end before watching Liway, but it still hit me emotionally like a tonne of bricks.
All in all, despite the occasional cliché (though these are done well) and a little heavy-handedness with the music, I think Liway does have an important place. The emotional weight of the storytelling aside, releasing this film during Duterte's presidency – and having watched it now with Marcos Jnr in power – really highlights the necessity of stories like this in contributing to collective memory.
And, yes, you will need a tissue box for this one.
Was this review helpful to you?
The Movie That Had Me Questioning My Entire Moral Compass
Okay, so Green Bones?? I walked into the theatre expecting a solid crime thriller, but walked out re-evaluating my entire worldview. Like, no exaggeration, this movie wrecked me.The premise is already wild—a person’s ashes turn green if they lived a life of goodness (which, excuse me, that’s a concept I’m obsessed with??). Then the film throws us into a tense prison drama with Xavier Gonzaga (Ruru Madrid), a corrections officer who takes his job wayyy too seriously, and Domingo Zamora (Dennis Trillo), a convict fighting for his freedom. From minute one, the intensity was unreal.
I loved how this movie made me second-guess everything. Like, do people actually change? Can redemption be real? Are our justice systems as fair as we think they are? The performances?? Chef’s kiss. Dennis Trillo had me on edge the entire time, and the suspense just kept building. Every scene had me gripping my popcorn, convinced something was about to go down.
By the end, I was just sitting there, staring at the credits, emotionally compromised. If you’re into movies that make you feel something—like really hit you with ethical dilemmas and gut-wrenching performances—you need to watch Green Bones. Just trust me on this one. 10/10 would spiral into deep thought again.
Was this review helpful to you?
"If your sword skill is poor, best to not carry it."
Pursuit of Vengeance was a 1977 kung fu flick whose cast was stronger than its story. Based on a Gu Long book, Chor Yuen must have struggled to contain the story in a 90-minute film. While the story may have been convoluted, the potent combination of Ti Lung, Tony Liu, and Lo Lieh made the film entertaining.Fu Hong Xue and Ye Kai wander into town and are invited to Ma Kong Qun’s school for dinner along with four other fighters. Six coffins are delivered ahead of them, not a good sign of a friendly welcome. Amongst the attendees is the unknown surviving son of Master Bai. The family leader was ambushed by thirty masked warriors and brutally murdered twenty years prior. Fu and Ye develop a friendship as they fight together or watch the other one fight. Into the mix, a sword for hire and playboy, Lu Xiao Jia drops into their laps. Lu has been sent to kill them, but as he hasn’t been paid yet, he works to keep them alive until he sees the money.
The Gu Long story behind Pursuit of Vengeance was also made into the 1993 movie, A Warrior’s Tragedy. I’d hoped by watching this film that I would better understand AWT, but alas not. The original story must have been quite complex with numerous characters as both films struggled to narrow down the focus and make it understandable. Frankie Chan wrote the music for this film and then 17 years later directed and starred in the remake. Ti Lung played Fu in both adaptations. At least he was closer to the character’s age in this one and didn’t walk around with that ridiculous limp as he did in AWT.
Despite the fact that this film was absurdly written, I enjoyed watching Ti Lung and Lo Lieh. Ti, as he usually did, played the straight man, this time to Lo and Tony Liu who delivered their comedy without going OTT. There were so many fights that many bit actors and stuntmen died at least twice! Mama Hung who was normally cast as a random villager even got in on the action as did Oyang Sha Fei! Tang Chia designed the fights which meant that they more theatrical than realistic. Unlike the remake’s over the top wire work, PoV had a modicum of super leaping individuals. It more than made up for any realistic elements by overusing the Mission Impossible face masks.
Pursuit of Vengeance had trouble with what must have been an unwieldy book to translate onto the screen. The fights were typical of the time, including bizarre weaponry. What made the film entertaining for me was the camaraderie between Ti Lung, Tony Liu, and Lo Lieh. They were fun to watch banter and fight back to back. I can honestly say I’ve never seen so much of Lo. Only for fans of old kung fu flicks and as always, rated on a generous curve for the genre.
26 April 2025
Trigger warning: Lo’s bare bottom on two occasions.
Was this review helpful to you?
Was this review helpful to you?
Was this review helpful to you?
Was this review helpful to you?
Was this review helpful to you?
Was this review helpful to you?
Was this review helpful to you?
Gripping and Quietly Intense
I think my most favourite of this is the technicality because it showed how high the stakes are. I mean it was already like that but that aspect of the film made me feel invested and thinking how they will pull this off.It was two hours long which I thought was too long but it as actually a good length. I really like how they just got into it. My favourite character, alongside the main, has got to be the General Commander - I think he pulled off being calm, focused and highly principled so well. I'm quite surprised he's listed as a supporting role. I think his role made such a big impact on how invested I got. His character was so impressive.
I think the only thing that I didn't feel convinced about was regarding the suspect. I don't know, just the way it was revealed and the motivations I guess made it feel far fetched? Plus the enormity of how it was done and who's done it just didn't feel believable.
Overall, I'm really glad I watched it. I think the main role, Takaichi, really rounded off the feel of the film with his good natured character. He was dependable and in charge which made you trust him and felt like everything's going to be okay even with the seemingly impossible situation.
Plus the scale of the production was amazing. The director/writer/team behind this are so so impressive. I also really liked Chika, the train driver. I think she was quietly holding everything together and wasn't thanked properly by the passengers when she was introduced 🙈
Was this review helpful to you?
Silly and lacking process
This movie could have been good but there is no process, every single scene is under developed and I am not really sure what they are trying to say here, unless it is don't get caught up in what people say and an eye for en eye makes you the eye.There could of course be more to it, something about society being quick to judge and that nothing really changes, or maybe some type of you we are all the villains in a world where people suck. Careful what you wish for, careful what you say someone may take it seriously... But it was all cluttered by the loudness, the mobs an the flickering camera.
Making my wish for depth... or my wishful interperted depth and the presence of some good actors up the score but my honest opinion would probably be meeh...
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
I have watched it already 4 times now...
What would I do to watch it for the first time. The best film if you want to watch something on a rainy day... The warm hug you need of encouragement... The feeling of being alive and the feeling of HOPE... I just love it sooooooooooooo much ... Worth every second! If you like the plot of someone blind but not everyone pitying them, this one is for you ! The main leads did an amazing job in portraying the characters. The chemistry was there andSpoiler:
it has a happy ending, despite how it looks in the last 15 minutes. Everything was sorted out, I at least didn't have any more questions.
I loved it....
If anyone has movie recommendations like this movie please PLEASE write it down below.
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Watercolor inclusion in life
The gentle, rhythmic pace of the plot accompanies the understanding of life without the sounds. The initial delicacy recalls silent cinema in which “the person” was central and not “the sound construct.”The direction and screenplay pointed to the pragmatism of real life, in which ignoble “grievances” exist but from which no wars but acts of social resilience are born. Changing the pool because deafness is seen as an outrageous disease reflects mentally and culturally undeveloped and conservative societies. This key reading is ascribed to all social communities in which the different is not welcomed not accepted but discriminated against from birth.
The challenges inherent in disability are unexpected for the able-bodied; we do not realize how society in its customs is geared toward non-inclusion. Fire or other alarm systems rely on sounds to spread the alert--what about the deaf? Do all condominiums have inclusion in building construction? Routine inspections by the principals why don't they consider these “rules” from the perspective of inclusion?
Immersing oneself is one of the small steps one could take as Yong Jun ... and it is enlightening to realize how for the able-bodied the “usual” is profoundly distant from the surroundings experienced by the differently abled.
Thus, inclusion is the film's silent protagonist, hidden until Yeo Reum's confession of “existence.” She who was born hearing in a deaf family forces herself to live as a deaf-mute in order to bridge the inclusion that the rest of the world does not contemplate for her family by nullifying her life.
"Hear me" is a film as delicate as a snowflake, the centrality of the plot is critical of the presence of inclusiveness in our societies but also emphasizes the risk of “taking on everything.”
Was this review helpful to you?
Recent Discussions
-
Vertical Short Drama3 minutes ago -
What was the last song (non Asian) that you listened to? #235 minutes ago -
Who Do You Prefer? (Kpop Ver.)37 minutes ago -
-
