The fact that a large amount of people here is okay with the SA is highly alarmingšI also love a flawed character,…
The way some of you enter DARK series expecting morality lessons needs to be studied honestly. Most people informed themselves before watching and knew EXACTLY what kind of story this was. Nobody pressed play thinking they were getting a healthy relationship PSA.
And who exactly told you everyone likes Lu Feng? Some people do, some donāt. Some feel the need to criticize every action, others simply engage with the story for what it is. Thatās how fiction works. Whatās weird is this constant moral grandstanding over fictional content as if people discussing a toxic character without writing a disclaimer every 5 seconds means they support abuse in real life.
This is a dark series. Morality was never the point. The point is the characters, the obsession, the damage, the dynamics, the tragedy. People are talking about the narrative, not applying to become Lu Fengās defense attorneys.
Also after everybody criticizes him⦠what exactly happens? Does Lu Feng magically stop being abusive? Does the plot rewrite itself? Or do you just want people to publicly condemn him so you can feel morally superior to strangers over fictional media?
You not liking the character is fine. Acting alarmed because other people can separate fiction from reality is another thing entirely.
THANK YOU š finally someone with actual media literacy in these comments!! Like⦠why are people watching…
After To My Shore I literally promised myself I would stop arguing with the morality police in comment sections š but then I came here and saw people throwing around genuinely heavy accusations and I just couldnāt stay quiet.
I just want to be able to watch an interesting story without constantly having to explain every 2 minutes how dark fiction works and how enjoying/exploring a toxic narrative does not suddenly reflect someoneās real-life morals.
And honestly I completely agree with you that people who are not used to this genre probably just shouldnāt consume it instead of forcing themselves through it and then attacking everyone else enjoying it. There is absolutely nothing wrong with preferring softer or healthier stories, but not every narrative is trying to be that.
MDL discussions are supposed to be about discussing the actual series, the characters and the writing, yet every time a darker story appears the entire conversation turns into defending yourself from ridiculous and offensive accusations that have barely anything to do with the show itself š
Also same, Iāve seen enough green shows and now I just want to explore the darkest part of the human mind. I donāt ask much ššš
Some people really need to stop asking for this to be turned into some green flag version when the whole point…
THANK YOU š finally someone with actual media literacy in these comments!!
Like⦠why are people watching a DARK toxic romance and then getting angry that itās dark and toxic š especially after the trailers/source material already made the tone extremely obvious from the start.
And exactly!!! Explaining why these dynamics exist or enjoying the story does NOT mean anyone condones abuse in real life. Iām so tired of the constant moral policing every single time a darker BL gets adapted. Also the comparison to thrillers/serial killer media is so real because nobody accuses horror fans of secretly supporting murder, yet dark romance fans constantly have to defend themselves for understanding fiction š
there is no excusing SA, he did what he did and idfc what yalls perspective is on lu feng anymore. i was rooting…
Do you actually understand what homophobia is and where it comes from? Homophobia does not exist because queer fiction explores toxic dynamics. Homophobia existed long before BL, danmei or dark romance and has historically been rooted in prejudice, dehumanization, religious and social stigma, and the idea that queer people are inherently immoral or āabnormal.ā
So saying that problematic queer fiction is āa reason for homophobiaā is a really dangerous argument because it indirectly shifts responsibility onto queer media and queer audiences instead of onto the homophobes themselves. It basically turns into: āwell, people become homophobic because queer stories are too toxic,ā which is the exact kind of rhetoric homophobes have used for decades to demonize queer people and queer relationships.
Toxic and abusive dynamics exist in fiction across every genre and every sexuality. Yet somehow queer stories are constantly expected to morally represent an entire community in a way straight fiction almost never is.
You can criticize the scene. You can hate the direction of the story. You can think Lu Feng is unforgivable. But implying that dark queer fiction itself fuels homophobia just because you personally dislike this narrative direction is not it.
I donāt think anyone is trying to justify Lu Fengās actions. itās clear as day what he has done. The thing…
I do agree that people are completely allowed to criticize certain scenes or feel uncomfortable with them. My point was never āyou canāt react negatively to this because itās dark romance.ā
What I was trying to say is that explaining why those scenes exist or why they are written that way is not the same as justifying them. A lot of these stories are intentionally built to be disturbing, emotionally intense, toxic or morally uncomfortable. The discomfort is often part of the point.
So when people say āthis is dark romance,ā they are not necessarily saying āthere is nothing wrong with this sceneā they are explaining that these dynamics are being intentionally explored as part of the genre itself, not accidentally inserted into an otherwise healthy romance.
That doesnāt mean viewers have to like it, excuse it or stop criticizing it. It just means the presence of disturbing dynamics is usually deliberate, not contradictory to what the story is trying to be.
I said what I said. If you all donāt understand male bodies, I canāt help you. You literally have to bend…
You are trying way too hard to turn rape into a āwell technicallyā debate and itās honestly disturbing.
The entire argument of āhe didnāt resist enough, therefore he was somewhat willingā is exactly the kind of rhetoric that has been used for years to invalidate victims ā especially male victims and victims assaulted by partners or people they trusted. A huge amount of assault happens within relationships, between people who love each other, are attracted to each other, or have emotional history together. That does not magically make coercion, intimidation, pressure or lack of consent disappear.
People freeze. People panic. People comply out of fear, shock, confusion, emotional pressure or survival instinct. None of that equals consent.
What becomes genuinely harmful is when people get so defensive over a character that they start repeating real-life victim-blaming rhetoric like āhe didnāt resist enough,ā āhe must have wanted it a little,ā or āmen canāt really be raped.ā At that point the discussion is no longer about fiction. it is about spreading dangerous misinformation that has been used against real survivors for years.
Depiction is not endorsement. But refusing to recognize assault because you like the character committing it is not media literacy either.
Folks, u need to chill with the SA. Do u know how hard it is for a man to rape another man? Itās virtually impossible.…
This is actually an incredibly dangerous and harmful thing to say.
Male rape is absolutely real, and the idea that a man āmust have wanted it to some extentā because of anatomy or physical strength is not only false, itās one of the exact myths that has been used for years to dismiss male victims of SA.
People can be overpowered, coerced, threatened, frozen in fear, manipulated, intoxicated, traumatized or unable to physically resist regardless of gender. Consent is not determined by whether someone āmanaged to fight back enough.ā Consent is determined by whether someone freely wanted and agreed to it.
And saying āitās hard to rape a man so he was probably willingā is genuinely disturbing logic. Thatās victim blaming, plain and simple.
You can discuss dark fiction without spreading harmful misinformation about real-life sexual assault.
I donāt think anyone is trying to justify Lu Fengās actions. itās clear as day what he has done. The thing…
First of all please point out where exactly I said rape or SA is okay. Quickly. Because all I did was explain what dark romance as a genre commonly contains. Dark romance is literally built around toxic, obsessive, morally unhealthy and taboo dynamics. Non/dub-con, manipulation, violence, power imbalance and psychological messiness are extremely common themes in it, whether people like it or not.
That is quite literally the point of dark romance.
The genre exists to explore extreme emotions, dangerous dynamics and darker aspects of human psychology IN FICTION.
And this is the part some of you seriously need to understand: exploring something in fiction does NOT equal supporting it in real life. Depiction does NOT equal endorsement. Those are two completely different things.
By that logic, anyone who enjoys horror supports murder, anyone who watches psychological thrillers supports kidnapping, and anyone who writes villains secretly agrees with abuse and manipulation. That argument falls apart instantly because people are capable of separating fiction from morality.
Whatās actually concerning is how comfortable some of you are with implying that people who read or write dark romance automatically support rape or abuse. Thatās an insane accusation to make just because someone understands the genre and its tropes. Depiction does not equal endorsement, no matter how badly some of you want to blur the two.
WTF! For the life of me, how can I continue watching after this?! while I do enjoy some toxic storyline here and…
I donāt think anyone is trying to justify Lu Fengās actions. itās clear as day what he has done. The thing people are trying to make a point about is that this is a very dark story and it will get worse. Dark romance is a genre (a vastly liked one) and it has a common pattern. usually is non/dub con and other things. Itās really not the same as omegaverse. Dark romance was created to be this cruel and dark.
In my almost 19 years of reading bl novels, excluding dark toxic characters in manga and manhwa BL, i honestly…
Every time a black flag shows up I compare him to Mo Ran (which I love with my whole heart and heās my favorite character of all times) and for now no one was as toxic as him during his Taxian Jun era šš
Thatās not remotely true. Lu Feng wasnāt a monster in the past. They were just in love. Yi Chen junior was being homophobic just like their parents. And heās still lying about hiding the messages btw. Lu Feng is a toxic person. And NOW heās in the wrong. But his current actions has nothing to do with Yi Chen junior being a liar who asked his brother if he could be ācuredā from being gay. Thatās a very different thing.
I canāt stand the brother. He lies to everyone while pretending to seek justice for his brother. I skip every…
Yi Chen junior is a little shit and NOTHING will ever make me like him. If Lu Feng get his revenge on him I will not be sorry for him. Not even in the slightest
I canāt stand the brother. He lies to everyone while pretending to seek justice for his brother. I skip every…
FR!!! As if he hadnāt been beaten with a bat by his own father and shipped off to America šš Heās definitely toxic and absolutely going to lose his mind, but that doesnāt mean he should be blamed for things that arenāt his fault to begin with.
So I think there will be yet another time skip before lu feng goes all crazy because rn they are using old models…
I believe that Lu Feng will completely loose his shit after Yi Chenās wedding. Maybe he will get a little more intense until then but I believe the wedding will be his breaking point
I canāt stand the brother. He lies to everyone while pretending to seek justice for his brother. I skip every…
I totally understand you because he was such a piece of shit when he found out about Yi Chenās relationship and now he can have one easily as that? Hell no bro. I do NOT forgive and forget.
what an emotional roller costar of an ep, but dude really has a problem with understanding that force isn't love…
Yeah, growing up with a father like that must have wired his brain into thinking that using force is natural. I do believe he doesnāt know better and that he feels sorry, but itās easier for him to impose himself even when he shouldnāt šš
unfortunately (and I speak for experience because it was like being in the trenches with abo desire and to my…
yeah definitely š also they should understand that he is fluffy when he wants to. But that doesnāt erase the other part of his personality šš
And who exactly told you everyone likes Lu Feng? Some people do, some donāt. Some feel the need to criticize every action, others simply engage with the story for what it is. Thatās how fiction works. Whatās weird is this constant moral grandstanding over fictional content as if people discussing a toxic character without writing a disclaimer every 5 seconds means they support abuse in real life.
This is a dark series. Morality was never the point. The point is the characters, the obsession, the damage, the dynamics, the tragedy. People are talking about the narrative, not applying to become Lu Fengās defense attorneys.
Also after everybody criticizes him⦠what exactly happens? Does Lu Feng magically stop being abusive? Does the plot rewrite itself? Or do you just want people to publicly condemn him so you can feel morally superior to strangers over fictional media?
You not liking the character is fine. Acting alarmed because other people can separate fiction from reality is another thing entirely.
I just want to be able to watch an interesting story without constantly having to explain every 2 minutes how dark fiction works and how enjoying/exploring a toxic narrative does not suddenly reflect someoneās real-life morals.
And honestly I completely agree with you that people who are not used to this genre probably just shouldnāt consume it instead of forcing themselves through it and then attacking everyone else enjoying it. There is absolutely nothing wrong with preferring softer or healthier stories, but not every narrative is trying to be that.
MDL discussions are supposed to be about discussing the actual series, the characters and the writing, yet every time a darker story appears the entire conversation turns into defending yourself from ridiculous and offensive accusations that have barely anything to do with the show itself š
Also same, Iāve seen enough green shows and now I just want to explore the darkest part of the human mind. I donāt ask much ššš
Like⦠why are people watching a DARK toxic romance and then getting angry that itās dark and toxic š especially after the trailers/source material already made the tone extremely obvious from the start.
And exactly!!! Explaining why these dynamics exist or enjoying the story does NOT mean anyone condones abuse in real life. Iām so tired of the constant moral policing every single time a darker BL gets adapted.
Also the comparison to thrillers/serial killer media is so real because nobody accuses horror fans of secretly supporting murder, yet dark romance fans constantly have to defend themselves for understanding fiction š
So saying that problematic queer fiction is āa reason for homophobiaā is a really dangerous argument because it indirectly shifts responsibility onto queer media and queer audiences instead of onto the homophobes themselves. It basically turns into: āwell, people become homophobic because queer stories are too toxic,ā which is the exact kind of rhetoric homophobes have used for decades to demonize queer people and queer relationships.
Toxic and abusive dynamics exist in fiction across every genre and every sexuality. Yet somehow queer stories are constantly expected to morally represent an entire community in a way straight fiction almost never is.
You can criticize the scene. You can hate the direction of the story. You can think Lu Feng is unforgivable. But implying that dark queer fiction itself fuels homophobia just because you personally dislike this narrative direction is not it.
What I was trying to say is that explaining why those scenes exist or why they are written that way is not the same as justifying them. A lot of these stories are intentionally built to be disturbing, emotionally intense, toxic or morally uncomfortable. The discomfort is often part of the point.
So when people say āthis is dark romance,ā they are not necessarily saying āthere is nothing wrong with this sceneā they are explaining that these dynamics are being intentionally explored as part of the genre itself, not accidentally inserted into an otherwise healthy romance.
That doesnāt mean viewers have to like it, excuse it or stop criticizing it. It just means the presence of disturbing dynamics is usually deliberate, not contradictory to what the story is trying to be.
The entire argument of āhe didnāt resist enough, therefore he was somewhat willingā is exactly the kind of rhetoric that has been used for years to invalidate victims ā especially male victims and victims assaulted by partners or people they trusted.
A huge amount of assault happens within relationships, between people who love each other, are attracted to each other, or have emotional history together. That does not magically make coercion, intimidation, pressure or lack of consent disappear.
People freeze. People panic. People comply out of fear, shock, confusion, emotional pressure or survival instinct. None of that equals consent.
What becomes genuinely harmful is when people get so defensive over a character that they start repeating real-life victim-blaming rhetoric like āhe didnāt resist enough,ā āhe must have wanted it a little,ā or āmen canāt really be raped.ā At that point the discussion is no longer about fiction. it is about spreading dangerous misinformation that has been used against real survivors for years.
Depiction is not endorsement. But refusing to recognize assault because you like the character committing it is not media literacy either.
Male rape is absolutely real, and the idea that a man āmust have wanted it to some extentā because of anatomy or physical strength is not only false, itās one of the exact myths that has been used for years to dismiss male victims of SA.
People can be overpowered, coerced, threatened, frozen in fear, manipulated, intoxicated, traumatized or unable to physically resist regardless of gender. Consent is not determined by whether someone āmanaged to fight back enough.ā Consent is determined by whether someone freely wanted and agreed to it.
And saying āitās hard to rape a man so he was probably willingā is genuinely disturbing logic. Thatās victim blaming, plain and simple.
You can discuss dark fiction without spreading harmful misinformation about real-life sexual assault.
Because all I did was explain what dark romance as a genre commonly contains. Dark romance is literally built around toxic, obsessive, morally unhealthy and taboo dynamics. Non/dub-con, manipulation, violence, power imbalance and psychological messiness are extremely common themes in it, whether people like it or not.
That is quite literally the point of dark romance.
The genre exists to explore extreme emotions, dangerous dynamics and darker aspects of human psychology IN FICTION.
And this is the part some of you seriously need to understand: exploring something in fiction does NOT equal supporting it in real life. Depiction does NOT equal endorsement. Those are two completely different things.
By that logic, anyone who enjoys horror supports murder, anyone who watches psychological thrillers supports kidnapping, and anyone who writes villains secretly agrees with abuse and manipulation. That argument falls apart instantly because people are capable of separating fiction from morality.
Whatās actually concerning is how comfortable some of you are with implying that people who read or write dark romance automatically support rape or abuse. Thatās an insane accusation to make just because someone understands the genre and its tropes.
Depiction does not equal endorsement, no matter how badly some of you want to blur the two.
The thing people are trying to make a point about is that this is a very dark story and it will get worse.
Dark romance is a genre (a vastly liked one) and it has a common pattern. usually is non/dub con and other things.
Itās really not the same as omegaverse. Dark romance was created to be this cruel and dark.
Yi Chen junior was being homophobic just like their parents. And heās still lying about hiding the messages btw.
Lu Feng is a toxic person. And NOW heās in the wrong. But his current actions has nothing to do with Yi Chen junior being a liar who asked his brother if he could be ācuredā from being gay.
Thatās a very different thing.
If Lu Feng get his revenge on him I will not be sorry for him. Not even in the slightest