Flypsyde

Listen, Nity, you came in here and accused someone of "body shaming" for using a vivid descriptive term you don't like. Yet you claim to be here just to be sweet and nice and discuss things calmly. Telling other people how to express themselves and attacking their choice of words is not respectful discussion. News: No one cares what YOU think of other peoples' writing style and choice of adjectives and analogy.

So "SJW" hit home with you, eh? It's good you know what you are.

This is the type of personal insult that comes when the commenter can no longer come up with more BS to support their position. lol

To an extent it IS twisted...that is a thing called DRAMA. A difficult, fascinating, compelling story is created so that we can see where it goes as an audience. Twisted characters, or in this case, basically good people, do twisted things all the time IRL and in stories. Who are YOU to tell the writers or anyone else what is "appropriate?" It's so weird. I've never seen people like in this thread who want a narrative to be tied up in a predictable, pretty bow by the end of the story. But no, you won't even wait to see how things develop, you want the plot to go YOUR way RIGHT NOW. Again, google "drama" and "narrative conflict" and "plot devices."

And I want to note your use of the hilariously stereotypical SJW word "problematic," as though you're going over what's been presented with a fine-tooth comb, looking for "problem" areas that don't fit your idea of what the story-line should contain. Then what? Do you email or call the production company and let them know you don't approve?

Stop watching this show and bitching about it.

Are you still waiting? I'm a paid commenter, yes, they pay me $400,000 a year to argue with sex-phobics like you.

Why the question marks?

"It’s just That is exactly something a rapist would stay". "Also, trolls like you like to make these comments to get people riled up." So you implied that I am a rapist and you called me a troll, which is the lamest, laziest accusation on the web. But no, you don't do name-calling. You're above that.

lol I'm crushed at your precise diagnosis of my plight. You see right through me. I'm so thankful someone, at long last, understands me...

Oh dear, did I get you "riled up?" Am I a "troll?" How will I ever sleep tonight?

Sorry, but I've never raped anyone. How is it you know what a rapist would say? Do you know a lot of them? I get it, you think there is some magical bright line that defines rape/not rape in every situation and circumstance, for every person, every time, everywhere. You are wrong. Details matter. Situations differ. No two people are alike. Yet you, and you alone, just kind of "know" when a sexual encounter is rape. Do you sniff the air, what?

Furthermore, if it IS rape, so what? It's a fictional series. No one has actually been raped. Obviously you're OK with murder as I doubt you inhabit the comment sections below the hundreds of violent murder mysteries produced each year.

Your snide final sentence above speaks volumes about YOU, Church-Lady.

Oh. Somewhere along the line I got the idea they own the place. Thanks for the correction.

I said he was "skinny." The comment I replied to said "he is skinny." No one in this particular conversation said anything about "Holocaust victims." That was in another exchange in which I was not involved.

However...saying he resembles a holocaust victim is an extreme way of making the point that the actor is extremely thin, perhaps to the point of unhealthy-thin. You are simply trying to police the way people express themselves here, and "body shaming" is one of the common SJW tropes used as an attack on people who use language the SJW does not approve of.

If I see a 500-pound person and say, "wow, that person looks like a giant basketball," that is an extreme, colorful way of pointing out that the person is fat to the point of dangerously obese." Which is a FACT. I wouldn't say that to that fat person's face because that would be needlessly cruel, but I don't care what you think of the language I or anyone else choose to use.

"problematic." lol

HE IS SKINNY. It's not "body shaming," it's a fact. lol Just another SJW trope..."body shaming."

Actually the older STEP-brother got himself drunk consuming drinks mixed by the younger STEP-brother. He's 30 years-old. He can drink as much as he wants to, no? He can stop when he chooses, right? Gosh, one might think he drank so much to deliberately free himself from the inhibitions put in place by sex-phobics like you.

That sure was a lot of coherent discussion and enthusiastic moaning and groaning for someone who was being viciously raped against his will. lol XS freaked out when he came to because all the anti-gay, anti-sex bigotry he'd been programmed to believe all his life by people like you came flooding back into consciousness.

Which is a shame, because for a few hours the night before he'd actually allowed himself to let go of that bullshit and experience the physical ecstasy which is his birthright as a fully complete gay man. Did you notice how utterly blissful he was when he first woke up? All the shrieking demons like you had been silenced for a while, then they all came skittering back in an instant when he saw his beloved STEP-brother/lover's face and panicked. From sweet bliss to guilt-addled despair in a few seconds, thanks to YOU and yours.

A rare breed: a gay woman who considers herself qualified to judge sexual conduct between two gay men. A Lesbian SJW Church-Lady Puritan BL fan. Wow, see a shrink. lol Are you one of the Lesbians who fetishize gay men by watching and pretending to be horrified at their imagined transgressive sexual activities? Do you get off on it somehow? I suspect you do.

Go read some Lesbian porn and leave the hot BL stuff to those of us who can handle it without reacting as though it is a Discovery Channel documentary on how gay men should conduct themselves IRL.

Ahhh...so in addition to being a Church-Lady, you're sexist too. Figures, assuming you're a woman, that since you fear sex you also fear fellow humans with penises, shuddering with fear that one of them might find its way into your Church-Lady parts.

Oh, and there was no rape to have a problem with between the step-brothers, Church--Lady. It's extra-hilarious, seeing as how you are a woman and I am a gay man, you feel qualified to more accurately determine than I what qualifies as rape in a situation involving two gay men.

Did your super-secret Church-Lady Weenie-Invasion alarm go off when you watched the boys going at it and enjoying themselves?

omg...you call THAT "bringing religion into it?" lol It's a turn of phrase, dunce. It doesn't mean I have inside information on your membership in some fucking church, it means that you may as well BE a Church-Lady because your attitudes toward sex and other issues are pretty much the same. "gas-light me..." lol, as if I'd bother. Have you whined to moderators to have my comments deleted, boo-hoo? That too, would be the direction a full-fledged Church Lady would go.

So what denomination are you? Or is it The Church of Latter Day Busy-Bodies Who Are Afraid of Sex and Want To Censor What Other People Are Allowed To See? If so, there are a lot of your fellow church members on this comment board.

I'm rude when it's required.

God, when will you get it? "Healthy sexual relationships" make for BORING drama! A show in which everyone behaved in unquestionably "healthy" ways in all aspects of their lives would be boring as hell. THINK about it. Even Disney movies and series present villains, evil people and good people who do bad things sometimes. Shades of gray is what life is. There is perfectly beautiful, lovely, gloriously pure sex where everyone signs multiple contracts and agreements and release forms with each escalation of pleasure from the first touch to orgasm and the whole thing is filmed just in case someone needs to be charged with rape after the fact, and on the other extreme there is violent, physically assaultive rape complete with torture, unspeakable inhumanity, bloody by-products and murder. In between those two extremes is an infinite, messy, beautiful universe of shades of gray. THAT is where the sexual scenarios in this show exist; that is where everything in life resides. It is juvenile in the extreme to pretend otherwise.

The sex-phobics in this thread and across BL-dom want every sex act to potentially be called "rape," regardless of circumstances and reality. One nut-job on this thread actually argued that a friend of theirs who VERBALLY CONSENTED to having sex with a dude by saying, speaking and uttering the word "yes," who then went through with that sex, had nevertheless been "RAPED" because darn it, the guy was just so darn persistent that he "talked her into it" against her will. So even a verbal "yes" can lead to rape. that's some crazy shit.

What is that "very simple reason?" "Conversation" is great, but I think a lot of what SJWs bring to the comment boards is exactly "useless hate" in the form of name-calling such as "pervert," "rape-apologist," "sicko," "freak," "mentally ill," etc. It has to be THEIR way or no way. These people are not here for rational conversations.

I didn't even catch that reference. Yes, that's a strange direction to take. Seems like the three owners would want to boot that asshole to make sure he didn't just do it to someone else. But there is always the risk of the incident going public when you do that. It's how the Catholic Church got away with child sexual abuse for centuries; they just moved the abusers around when they were caught.