Vincenzo Cassano

Depends on the romance. Is it good?

How is it? Much romance? Any love triangles?

How is it? Much romance? Any love triangles? Happy ending? It doesn't say in the description why the FL wants revenge on the ML. Is this a spoiler, and that's why it's not in the description?

I don't know the average budget for big dramas. So i don't know if 8 million dollars is good or not. But i do like this drama, although i thought it would be better.

Is this a low budget drama? I'm on episode 12, and it just seems a bit low in quality.

No, why stop there? Let's ban social media altogether. They're all evil. They're all stalkers. You and i are stalkers right now just for messaging each other. But why stop there? Let's ban movies and dramas. Anything that shows a video or picture of our godly idols is stalking. So no more dramas. Ah, That feels better. Now i know what you crazy idol worshipping fans feel like when you protest against everything.

Great, you're 100% correct. Paparazzi are evil and need to be banned immediately. They contribute to nothing of importance and are no help to celebrities, except for when celebrities use them for their own benefits. So maybe we can just temporarily unban them for the sole purpose of using them, then immediately ban them again. I love it👍 I wonder why we don't have laws to make paparazzi illegal🤔 Oh well, who cares? Let's just ban everything that annoys us. Ok fellow crazy idol worshipping fan, let's continue praying to our idol gods.

MDL, this is disgusting. How dare you show the image of actors and report about their lives. How dare you inform the viewers. How dare you provide the actors media attention helping their brand and exposing their work and upcoming dramas leading to increased views and ratings so they can earn millions of dollars. Take this down immediately and don't ever post anything again unless there's no images and words. Join me fellow crazy idol worshipping fans. Let's protest against MDL and the paparazzi and ban them so these articles that contribute to the millions of dollars of income to our idols never see the light of day.

Ok, let's go with your logic and ban all paparazzi. It's now illegal to be paparazzi. So what about the many celebrities using the paparazzi for their own benefits and gains? Their careers often thrive on the media attention, and it helps their "brand." So no paparazzi means possibly less work and less exposure to get new roles. What about the media informing the world about the lives of actors and actresses? Young people looking to become their idols, maybe even becoming actors, artist, or celebrities themselves, will now have less information on the lifestyles of celebrities to understand if thats what they want. So now celebrities and famous people have no accountability, no fear of their actions, can do whatever the hell they want. And who knows what the ban of paparazzi could lead to. With the lack of exposure and information of celebrities, many idol worshipping crazy fans may stalk their idols in a huge wave of uncontrollable proportions. It's most likely the paparazzi kept that in check. Be careful what you wish for, because sometimes the grass isn't always greener on the other side. Paparazzi are not stalkers. they're essential, and it's legal

😂You can't answer because you know I'm right, not because of that nonsense you spewed.

Do you even know the difference between stalking and paparazzi? It seems like you and many others have no idea of the difference. All this crying in the comments because of lack of knowledge and ignorance. Let me explain. "Stalking" means to, on multiple occasions, threaten an individual, damage or unlawfully enter a persons real or personal property, maliciously harassing another person with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family is guilty of the crime of stalking. In order to be guilty of stalking you have to make the person afraid for their safety. Paparazzi might be annoying, but most people aren't worried for their safety around them. Most of them do not actually stalk. They do not follow someone with the intent to cause harm or to threaten them. They also generally take their photos from public property. I will say there are some paparazzi that take it too far and become stalkers, but most of them are just doing their job legally.

lo_ve can post anything he/she wants to as long as it's legal and within the guidelines. Who are you tell lo_ve what's right and wrong and what should or shouldn't be posted? It's you crazy fans who puts your idols on these giant pedelstals where no one can look at them, touch, them, talk to them or about them, or even taking a picture of them in PUBLIC where they have NO RIGHTS TO PRIVACY. This doesn't just apply to celebrities. If you were walking down the street, and someone took photos of you, there wouldn't be a god damn thing you could do about it. Even if you called the police, they'd laugh at your ignorance. I can't believe there are people like you who don't understand privacy laws, don't understand the difference between stalking and the paparazzi, and can't understand there's nothing wrong with this article. Respond or not, i don't care. Now continue worshipping your idol gods.

You don't seem to understand, they're public figures, they chose this career path, it was their choice and they knew about the paparazzi and how they work. Stop comparing them to the average person. If i had the choice of photos taken of me in the street but have millions of dollars for it, then I'd choose that in a heartbeat, and you would to and don't deny it. There are also times that celebrities really want the paparazzi to be filming them. Their careers sometimes thrive on the media attention, and it helps their "brand." For some people, this is a really big deal, like Paris Hilton, who isn't really famous for much other than paparazzi attention. At the same time, a celebrity may want to develop the image of being a sort of playboy big shot, so being filmed at a club helps that. So they can use the paparazzi for their gain, but complain when the same paparazzi take their pics without their knowledge. They can't have it both ways.

Who says this is not what MDL is used for? Are you thy MDL police? Is there a policy on MDL regarding this? Are you the owner of MDL? This is perfectly fine because it involves the actors in these dramas, movies, series, etc. In fact, there are also actors and actresses links on MDL you can go to. So it certainly is relevant. What's private about it? They're public figures, they're in the public eye, they were literally in public when the pictures were taken. It's perfectly legal. Stop with this nonsense about "consent" and "permission." There is no right to privacy when you're in public. Look it up, it's a fact. There's also a law called freedom of the press. So don't tell or demand MDL what to post or what not to post. They have every right.

Thank you MDL for posting this and keeping me up to date.

Do you even know the difference between stalking and paparazzi? It seems like YOU and many others have no idea of the difference. All this crying in the comments because of lack of knowledge and ignorance. Let me explain. "Stalking" means to, on multiple occasions, threaten an individual, damage or unlawfully enter a persons real or personal property, maliciously harassing another person with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family is guilty of the crime of stalking. In order to be guilty of stalking you have to make the person afraid for their safety. Paparazzi might be annoying, but most people aren't worried for their safety around them. Most of them do not actually stalk. They do not follow someone with the intent to cause harm or to threaten them. They also generally take their photos from public property.

You have to remember they are public figures. They chose to put themselves in the publics eye. There are also times that celebrities really want the paparazzi to be filming them. Their careers sometimes thrive on the media attention and it helps their "brand." For some people, this is a really big deal, like Paris Hilton, who isn't really famous for much other than paparazzi attention. At the same time, a celebrity may want to develop the image of being a sort of playboy big shot, so being filmed at a club helps that. So they can use the paparazzi for their gain, but complain when the same paparazzi take their pics without their knowledge.

Once again, they chose this lifestyle. They knew exactly what they were getting into. I'm NOT part of the problem, I simply read the articles. So stop complaining when these millionaires get their photos taken walking down the street. It's legal and perfectly normal, and MDL has every right to post this.

Yeah, i agree it happens with both genders in dramas but not from the main leads. We see it happen with the bad guy, and of course we don't say much about it because we know he's the evil character that will do these things, even murder. But let's imagine the ML tried to force or rape the FL to get her pregnant. Do you think nothing would be mentioned in the comments? He would be called toxic, a red flag, and any other words to criticise him. I never saw any of this criticism towards the FL in the comment section. In fact, i saw the opposite. She's strong, empowering, confident, and courageous. So yes, if the roles were reversed, there would be outrage, and i guarantee this wouldn't be rated so high.

But is it really personality disorder? So what was that black smoke that entered his body as a child? That looks like an evil spirit to me. And if it is personality disorder, the drama made him out to be two separate characters. Even the FL saw them as two different people. Therefore, we now have a ML and SML.

I'm on episode 5, and i was enjoying this, but it's concerning me now how the evil spirit cares more for her than Hyun does. Hyun didn't even want to save her when she was in jail and sentenced to death. Why am i viewing an evil spirit more deserving of her love? It's off-putting.

Edit: Nah, i think I'll drop this. I just finished episode 5 and I'm not going to continue witnessing an evil spirit winning the love of the FL. He definitely deserves her, he treats her better than the ML, but i just don't like it. The ML abandoned her while the evil spirit saved her. I was really looking forward to this, but i don't like SML's getting the girl.

When you step outside of home, you lose all right to privacy. People take videos and pictures all the time in public. Just look at people at theme parks, concerts, and gatherings. You can rightfully take pictures of anyone in public. So, with your logic, why don't paparazzi and journalists get arrested? Because they're not breaking the law. Now you can say it's immoral, but it's perfectly legal.

You don't have the right to privacy when you're in public or in view of the public. Most people here seem to not understand this. That's why this comment section is unnecessarily blowing up. Whether it crosses the line or not, it's legal and will happen and always will happen. If i had the choice of having pictures taken of me walking down the street while having millions of dollars, i would gladly choose that option, and you would to and don't deny it.

😂😂😂🍿🥤