Did i say their lives are my concern? I'm not a journalist, that's not my job, i just read the articles. You seem to think I'm the one out there taking pictures. I don't give a damn about their money. I'm just telling it how it is. They are celebrities, and they are rich and famous, so did i say anything about doctors and lawyers? And it doesn't matter who you are, the law still states if you're in public and in view of the public, your picture can be taken and used in the media wheather you like it or not. Don't be triggered because your idols are in the media. You think this wasn't going to happen? And why are you attacking and insulting me? Did i insult you? Be respectful, be better than that?
No, it's not. They're celebrities getting paid millions of dollars. They knew what they were getting into when they chose this career. They knew this would happen when they're in the public eye. That's the price to pay when you earn millions of dollars and don't need to worry about bills, medical care, food, housing, or anything else needed to survive. They can retire right now and don't need to worry about money ever again. Even their children and grandchildren won't need to worry about money.
😂😂😂🍿 Love these triggered comments. Keep them coming🍿🥤 By the way great article, thanks for the info. To be clear, there's nothing wrong with the article, media, or the journalist involved in this story. It's call Freedom of the Press. there is no right to privacy that protects a person’s image in public or in public premises. There is also no restriction on taking photographs of people on private property from public property. So people who are photographed on their property from a public location have no legal claim against you if what is captured in the photograph can be seen from the street. Whether you like it or not, that's the law.
That scene was so messed up and problematic, and I hated how they tried to make it funny. At least she didn't…
I was shocked when i saw that scene, and it happened a couple of times. I came to the comments to see if anyone mentioned it, but i saw nothing. I then went on to finish the drama and came back to check again, and still nothing. I don't understand why it was brushed off as if it were normal and enjoyable. I guarantee if the roles were reversed, there would be outrage. There's this disgusting view from many people that think men enjoy being raped. It's like, oh, he probably enjoyed it. Ludicrous. It's a good show, but a scene like this from one of the main leads shouldn't have happened.
Who's the boy in the last scene of the last episode? Also, why don't i see any comments criticising the FL for trying to rape the ML? What if the roles were reversed? I bet the comment section would blow up. So it's not ok for men to rape women, but it's just fine for women to rape men? I didn't realise there were such double standards.
Yeah, good. i liked it. I know it's a bit different than PMR, but i can't avoid comparing the two because it's the same story. PMR is better. the romance is better, and I liked the FL character more in PMR. Why did they make a similar story to PMR so soon after?
I'm on episode 5, and the ML is a great character, but he's incompetent in managing his employees. How can he allow that character (who's the FL's supervisor or team manager) to treat his subordinates unprofessionally and with prejudice? Is he oblivious or just ignoring the situation?
I just finished episode 3. A huge W for the ML. Somehow, he knew the FL would be in trouble at her reunion, so he sent the chef to reveal the truth even though he knows the chef likes her and might end up losing her to him. He's probably looked out for her many times without her knowledge. I hope one day she realises this, i would love to see her expression and reaction upon finding out. I'm now concerned we're going to have a huge love triangle between the leads, the chef, and the boyfriend she was married to in the future. I hope not, but i doubt it. After all, it's a Kdrama.
I just started episode 2. It's off to a good start. I have a question about the romance. Is it slow burn or begins early on? Is there more romance here or in Perfect Marriage Revenge?
By the way great article, thanks for the info. To be clear, there's nothing wrong with the article, media, or the journalist involved in this story. It's call Freedom of the Press. there is no right to privacy that protects a person’s image in public or in public premises. There is also no restriction on taking photographs of people on private property from public property. So people who are photographed on their property from a public location have no legal claim against you if what is captured in the photograph can be seen from the street. Whether you like it or not, that's the law.