OneAjhussi

I have seen Jung Hae Jin in "While you were sleeping" and "Something in the rain". I am not a huge fan of him but he seems to do better here. Maybe action drama fits him better. I will try D.P. when I have some time.

I like the pairing with Ji Soo too. I think they make a nice couple visually. The chemistry is good so far but waiting for more.

I like that they placed this in the 80s. There is not so much drama for this period. I like the vibe of 80s even if I think there is a few anachronism with some props. I am curious about where this drama is going to take us. I wish there is action in NK and Germany and time jump maybe. Really hope this will be good.

I did not mock them. I just told you SJWs should stop pretending to defend the victims. SJWs can't even find an argument in the drama episodes to back their claims which are just founded on conjunctions. They are the ones mocking the victims with their baseless claims. You yourself can't even explain how the drama is romanticizing the authoritarian regime or the ANSP from 1987.

You have no arguments. Just a fake outraged posture in front of an article that you post again and again but it fails to support your narrative against this drama because it is not about this drama.

It is Disney who purchased the rights of the show. Apparently it ended filming but not sure if all the episodes are fully delivered. If they want to cancel, they can cancel it for South Korea and let Disney broadcast it for the rest of the world.

As for the beginning of your post, it is a little bit excessive. Can't put this on a whole country.

The victims have their own voice. They don't need SJWs to talk in their stead. It is the SJWs who needs them so they can exist.

Copying and pasting the same message times and times in this comment section is just the proof that you have no argument and your narrative is in a dead end.

Are you trying to pass this as a way to romanticize the ANSP ? Because real ANSP would have shot the woman so because this ANSP in this drama did not do it, It is a romanticization of them?

Nice effort but the portrayal of the ANSP here is nowhere a good one or a romanticized one. Being objective instead of trying to sell a narrative at all cost is better if one wants to be credible.

It is controversial because some people want to make a controversy of it. They are claiming the drama is romanticizing the ANSP which is compeltely false based on the 2 first eps. It is their job to chase after NK agents and they are doing it the worst way in the drama.

If the ML was a SK student framed by ANSP agents, the SWJs would claim that the drama is using the real tragedy of real student to make money bla bla bla. It is just the story of a NK agent and they are already claiming to speak for the "victims" . It is ludicrous but these people they know the feelings of all victims. This is why they are keyboard warriors for social justice.

You see the level of bashing this drama is receiving just because there is a real NK agent. What would it be if he was a real SK student accused of being a NK agent like it happened to some real SK students... ?

Lee Kang Moo and his bunch of stooges cops are incompetent, violent and disrespectful. This is why they barged in a dormitory full of women with no warrant. They threatened a civilian at gunpoint, created a mess before going back to get a warrant and they had no consideration for naked women. Even if the cop was a woman, it is still rude and disrespectful.

These people who claim the drama is romanticizing the ANSP, if the have the same footages of cops doing this to civilians nowadays, they would go on a crusade against the cops.

How is this romanticizing the dictatoship when the governing party in this drama is presented as a mafia organization doing crazy stuffs that only a gangster organization would. As for the ANSP, they are totally reckless, brutal and incompetent. There are so many SJW talking for the "victims" but they are unable to find anything in these two episodes to back their claim.

I also like the character. The scene on the dam is something that happened earlier. It is possible she is a North Korean who defected to South Korea.

Having been hurt and a witness grants no right to judge but just one to testimony... The only judge is the one presiding the trial and the only ones to deliver a judgement are the ones chosen between the pairs. Know your facts.

So among these, which one is Im Soo Ho and which one is Eun Young Ro?

This drama is not a documentary work presenting facts about South Korea history. It's a fiction. Most people in this drama never existed. It is like saying "Donald Duck 44th episode is a distorsion of the history of the USA". Errr.. Sorry. Donald duck is a fictional duck. So everything happening in his world is fictional. What is not understandable in this? Do you know the television series "The Man in the High Castle". Is not this a distorsion of history?

Then tell us what were their real names... or are you just talking nonsense?

Lucky for him, he is not presenting historical facts. He is portraying a character in a fiction.

Well it is not up to them to judge what is fine or not either...

Wow... conspiracy theory now? lol... I rest my case.

Do you think Im Soo Ho and Eun Young Ro existed in 1987 in South Korea? No. So that must be a serious breach of history...

Keep cool man. This drama is not a documentary about South Korea history. It is a fiction. If they use Mikey Mouse or Howard the Duck in episode 3, don't be mad. It is a fiction. OK? Most characters in this drama never existed in the South Korea history.

It's a show. Like the Survivor. Lovers Island or Britain greatest talent or American Idol. Keep cool.