> who hides in the back of a neighbour's van because of some scraping furnitureHaven't seen this movie, but…
Dude, people tell me that I have, "Daredevil hearing!" Luckily, my neighbours seldom play music (albeit, it is annoying in the summer pretty much everywhere!), but their TV during ice hockey can be utter bullshit! The other side are night-owls, so I hear the woman laughing late on (I shan't endeavour to guess why, but she has about 3 different laughs, which I've deduced have different prompts).
The problem with this film wasn't so much that the neighbours were making noise, but that the MC was terrified! Well, it's on Viki (Europe), if you want to check it out.
I don't think it's intended that way. It is problematic for the system to figure out if the previous work is an…
Actually, you're kind of wrong:
When a PREQUEL is mislabelled in the sense that it's the original work, people might want to see the supposed prequel first, which could definitely spoil the ACTUAL ORIGINAL (sorry for the cap, btw, but I don't know how to use italics).
The system, itself, should know what work is a prequel simply by the DATES.
Star Wars 4, 1977: THE VERY FIRST FILM SW 5, 1980: SEQUEL to the original film SW 6, 1983: 2nd sequel
SW 1, 1999: a BONA FIDE PREQUEL - this film begins to explain how the main villain of the original 3 SW films came to be. SW 2, 2002: continuation of the Darth Vader story, thus still a prequel to the original trilogy, but a SEQUEL to the 1999 film. SW 3, 2005: final episode of the prequel trilogy. They were all shit, btw.
SW 7, 8, 9 (2015, 2017, 2019): SEQUELS in every sense of the word to both of the previous entries of triplets. Also total dog turd, but that's neither here nor there.
Before anyone asks: NO, I can't stand stand bloody Star Wars, but it does serve as pretty much the perfect example of how DATES, and correctly labelling titles as PREQUELS is important to people wanting to consume content.
Edited to add: Sometimes people who aren't so interested in putting tens or hundreds of hours into an on-going, developed world (often TV series) but want to sate curiosity and/or say to their mates, "Yes, I actually tried it," will opt for prequel or SPIN-OFF, if they are easily accessible and rated highest by whoever made the recommendation to see it. Yes, spin-offs and prequels can ruin the main and/or original story, but, again, the correct labelling is important so that the viewer knows he'll be diving in to a relatively fresh new story/world, and not just randomly watching, say, S6E1, which directly follows on from the previous 5 series.
Lol! I was going to watch this but I didn't know if it was gay.I'm not into "BL" but, even though the straight…
Lol. I get notifications that someone's replied and I click on the said notifications. Usually they're for the forums, but sometimes they're for arse-clowns who object over people having different tastes/opinions and want to start needless drama.
Lol! I was going to watch this but I didn't know if it was gay.I'm not into "BL" but, even though the straight…
You should look up the meaning of *bigot*, you might just find that it originally meant, *hypocrite*... and the way it's used, implies that it still does. So people who have different beliefs/values to you are *bigots*? Yep, hypocrisy, right there.
It's pretty shit, to be honest. The effects were okay, the sets were top notch and the acting, well, it's what we'd all expect from those names but, ultimately, a huge budget can't fix a bad script.
I don’t agree with you, the king was in a position of power, he was both older and a royalty, Hong Rim could…
So this is about a king who paedo' groomed a boy and, now that the boy is a man, the king asks him to knock up the queen, since the king can't get hard to women... and then the boy/man discovers he's actually straight?
So does he kill the sick bastard king and take his place with his heir growing inside the queen's belly?
For some reason, this class of "all girls" (I'm sure one of them is a boy!), has a popularity vote once a month and the last placed person can be ruthlessly bullied... because, well, why not? So when a new girl transfers in and gets the last vote, she gets beaten up - for chuckles, apparently - and we're supposed to accept this bullshit as being even remotely possible?
Yeah... nah! I'm not into seeing teenage girls being nasty cunts to one another and, coupled with the stupid premise, I dumped this.
2 
Luckily, my neighbours seldom play music (albeit, it is annoying in the summer pretty much everywhere!), but their TV during ice hockey can be utter bullshit!
The other side are night-owls, so I hear the woman laughing late on (I shan't endeavour to guess why, but she has about 3 different laughs, which I've deduced have different prompts).
The problem with this film wasn't so much that the neighbours were making noise, but that the MC was terrified!
Well, it's on Viki (Europe), if you want to check it out.
Why permit opinions if they're going to be censored?
When a PREQUEL is mislabelled in the sense that it's the original work, people might want to see the supposed prequel first, which could definitely spoil the ACTUAL ORIGINAL (sorry for the cap, btw, but I don't know how to use italics).
The system, itself, should know what work is a prequel simply by the DATES.
Star Wars 4, 1977: THE VERY FIRST FILM
SW 5, 1980: SEQUEL to the original film
SW 6, 1983: 2nd sequel
SW 1, 1999: a BONA FIDE PREQUEL - this film begins to explain how the main villain of the original 3 SW films came to be.
SW 2, 2002: continuation of the Darth Vader story, thus still a prequel to the original trilogy, but a SEQUEL to the 1999 film.
SW 3, 2005: final episode of the prequel trilogy. They were all shit, btw.
SW 7, 8, 9 (2015, 2017, 2019): SEQUELS in every sense of the word to both of the previous entries of triplets. Also total dog turd, but that's neither here nor there.
Before anyone asks: NO, I can't stand stand bloody Star Wars, but it does serve as pretty much the perfect example of how DATES, and correctly labelling titles as PREQUELS is important to people wanting to consume content.
Edited to add:
Sometimes people who aren't so interested in putting tens or hundreds of hours into an on-going, developed world (often TV series) but want to sate curiosity and/or say to their mates, "Yes, I actually tried it," will opt for prequel or SPIN-OFF, if they are easily accessible and rated highest by whoever made the recommendation to see it.
Yes, spin-offs and prequels can ruin the main and/or original story, but, again, the correct labelling is important so that the viewer knows he'll be diving in to a relatively fresh new story/world, and not just randomly watching, say, S6E1, which directly follows on from the previous 5 series.
Typical gay bullshit.
So people who have different beliefs/values to you are *bigots*?
Yep, hypocrisy, right there.
I'm not into "BL" or gay stuff. It's that simple.
So does he kill the sick bastard king and take his place with his heir growing inside the queen's belly?
Check your head, dude.
A shame everyone here's saying it sucks arse.
For some reason, this class of "all girls" (I'm sure one of them is a boy!), has a popularity vote once a month and the last placed person can be ruthlessly bullied... because, well, why not?
So when a new girl transfers in and gets the last vote, she gets beaten up - for chuckles, apparently - and we're supposed to accept this bullshit as being even remotely possible?
Yeah... nah! I'm not into seeing teenage girls being nasty cunts to one another and, coupled with the stupid premise, I dumped this.
How soon before the flames...?