SinGood

Based from argumentation, she's a troll and homophobic using subtle approaches. I don't know if she has ever done the similar complaint in other dramas on this platform. Because if not, knowing she's not a fan of BL, she can be accused of homophobia by trying to make use of "consent" as if people here don't have any idea about it. And she's trying to be superior, like what? So she can be respected. OMG.

Have you even posted this similar complaint/sentiment/whatever in other dramas on this platform?

Because if you haven't, aside from trolling here, you can even be accused of being homophobic.

In other words, you're preaching to a choir. LOL.

And yet, you want the people to take side with you by persuading them to stop consuming because it's immoral. Now, tell me I am correct so that we can stop here and then people here will really know your intention.

You better make your intention clear from the start if you don't want any argumentation. LMAO

It's you are who digressing to the point. I incorporate cases based on a certain subject I want to discuss while you try to be high and mighty and consider yourself superior than others. LOL.

Anyways, you're bordering on trolling now. So I have to stop here.

Well good luck then. You seem to be an elite.

But again, we should never be gullible.

It seems to be a copy-paste. LOL

From this article, right?

https://areomagazine.com/2019/05/08/give-them-an-argument-logic-for-the-left-book-review/

Try again.

And yes, have a nice night in your timezone.

LOL. FYI, your statements here constitute moralist and feminism theories despite the incoherence of thoughts. I had to digest and make assumptions. And yes, I do. LOL

"which is why i made a seperate comment. aren't we under the "don't like don't read" clause you seem to enjoy? "

Hmm.... yeah. You seem to have enjoyment in obstructing free will. In universal law, that's a grave offense.

You seem to be preaching to a choir. And I don't like preachers as if they're like the holy men or some higher beings. LOL.

"what's also clear is that you have no idea what you're talking about."

I study legal aspect. I think that gives me a factor that I have an idea what I am talking about.

Do you even have an idea what you're talking about?

I sense incoherence of thoughts on your side. That's why you're not making sense and it's not only me who have that comment.

"i can give you multiple examples of disgusting rape apologia and break down why i think it's irresponsible. it would be a waste of my precious time unless you paid me but one day i do so hope someone can, too, google and put together a document with links on books and papers to help you, all of you."


Did you even read my comments? Are you able to comprehend it?

Where in my comments that would constitute me to be a rape apologist?

It's getting hilarious here. I can fight you with word play and use legal jargons and syntaxes if I like. But I won't go to that extent. You can't even comprehend my comments, how much more if I incorporate words that would not be comprehensible to lay people.

"it's just not valid to you because...you don't want it to be. you want to write paragraphs justifying why people's anger is wrong? interesting. it's wrong to lie, it's irresponsible and honestly lazy writing/production to have assault be a trope that women feed into, and it's...stupid."

Uhmmm... what kind of film-maker are you? Do you derive your production from an original concept or from scratch?

If we base it on the TT series, the production of this show is derived from the novel. The novelist is also the producer. So, do you have right to stop its production based on Constitution of a certain jurisdiction? Are you from Thailand? Does your law have provision that prevents this kind of production from getting aired?

You may somehow obstruct the constitutional right of the producer/novelist by using a moralist approach that is detrimental to artistic development.

You are always saying wrong here and wrong there. What gives you that right? Are you even a judge in the justice system?

" i am a filmmaker so no lol. but this is a poor comparison. you made up a claim and can't back it up. i have the right to type. i don't have power, but i want to empower my people and other's that want to listen. "

You're a film-maker, so what? That even gives me a hint that you are from the competition or perhaps, an associate with agenda to dissuade audience not to patronize this series. So perhaps, there may be that black propaganda of some sort using the concept of "consent".

"and you made up a claim and can't back it up"

Can you be more specific?

I think your group may have made a claim but can't really back it up. I may even incorporate legalese here but you have to pay me. LOL

And let's not talk about age. I'm in my middle term of this lifetime, but does that give me a factor that I have more experiences than you? I am not really sure about that because we don't know each other. So to use that premise that I have more experiences than you in argumentation would behoove me to think that I am more superior than others based on seniority. And it's probably the same with you on that thinking. But to use that in argumentation would be irrelevant.

And what point am I lying? Lol

Again, are you even making sense?

No, you don't. I am sorry. It's the same BS we have here trying to preach about consent. So far, there's no one stopping you to call out but you have to be prepared for argumentation. Because, from what I 've seen is that when the likes of you don't have any thing to rebut, you resort to insult people to be advocates of rape and violence. And you even have the audacity to comment, "don't rape apologize." Does that even make sense to you? LOL

And to add, you lack jurisdiction when you try to be a moralist. This is where you are in that state:


"it's 2019 okay. if you don't understand these simple concepts google. GOOGLE. learn about consent and media, your body, the problems with bl, literally anything. do not buy into this egregious idea that speaking out and calling things out when they need to be is bad or takes enjoyment from others. they're lying."

There are problems and issues that can be pointed out not just in this drama but in any drama. But it requires approach.

Will you even watch porn when you clearly have problem with it? That's why it's there for specific audience. Countries have ways to block their IP's of these porn sites considering that they're unlawful in their jurisdictions. But some still make a way to consume porn and visit those sites.

The question is when you attempt to point out certain errors about consent in this drama, what do you get out from it?

You may not know it but you're insulting the intelligence and maturity of this series' audience. And then you try to exaggerate your gracious intelligence.

From those statements though, you clearly want to shut down the industry. But do you have the right? Do you have power?

It seems you're in a community with agenda to purge the entertainment industry and all things you think are bad. I get that. But you simply don't have the right to step on a jurisdiction when you're preaching a certain dogma.

It's really a case-to-case basis. Perhaps, in my country in Asia, women would have to be more careful picking men to be their boyfriends or husbands. There are movies depicting this kind of situation. It would be different with gay men though unless if the husband is bisexual and he's in an intimate scene with another woman in acting.

"Everyone else in the BL world pretty much knows that if they fake a relationship they can make money out of it... "

I agree. It's how they get their bread. It's either you fall into their trap or be an amused audience watching the shippers going gaga over them.

And you are here because of what?

Trying to preach a certain dogma about certain religions you have?

I bet you probably wanted the writer of any drama to include a plot where the villain needs to ask permission to slap the protagonist so that there should be consent in all their actions.

What kind of art you in and why are you even here?

Isn't the mature rating enough for you?

Your actions can be justified if the show is rated PG but this is not what it is.

This commenter does not really make sense. I am not sure what she is against. She's maybe from a religious group trying to shut down the industry.

She probably has problems with the entertainment industry in general. I bet she also has problems with straight dramas and she wanted the villains to be more polite like in a plot that would involve slapping. She probably wanted the writer to include a plot where the villain needs to ask permission to slap the protagonist so that there should be consent in all their actions. Oh my god!!! What kind of thinking is this? They are probably nuns in disguise or some old ladies who want to lecture the youngsters about not consuming content on TV and social media because they are the windows of the devil. Why is she even here?

You're not making sense. LOL.

MORALIST ALERT!

Are you from the Vatican or some radical religious rights?