ariel alba

Khram decides not to drag Thai to travel to the other side of the boundary that separates the two worlds, considering that he may die before him. But this does not hold up, since he himself traveled to the other side and did not die. As far as we know, the strange illness he suffered is not the result of this trip.
And on the other hand, what forces Khram to make the trip in the opposite direction? Nothing. Nothing forces Khram to leave this world and return to his own. It was not well established that he does it to go to meet his father again, a person he has not remembered in all this time, with the exception of episode 9 when the conversation with the woman who reminds him of his mother caused him to remember his father. But before this conversation, Khram must have already made the decision to travel to the other side, following Aunt Lou's phone call. In this call nothing urges him to begin the journey. It only reminds him that on the next Full Moon the waters will be blue again. Nothing else.
By the way, the lady who remembers Khram's mother, for being blind, opened her frightened eyes when she “saw” Khram emerge from the water bathed in blood during the ceremony of exchanging ashes, in episode 8.
And Jao... Jao quickly forgot all the love he has felt for Thai for years after recognizing that Thai loves Khram and quickly connected with Wayu. This was expected, but they should have better developed the evolution of this relationship. Until practically the last moment Jao has been showing interest in Thai. Or are we supposed to think that every time someone helps Jao, he might stop loving one person and fall in love with another? Very good scenes of explicit sex and nudity between the two. The best of the episode.

You can read my review, if you're interested, but it's not in this comments section, but in the reviews section. It will surely make your eyes pop out of your head again, as it is equally extensive and, above all, it tells many truths that many BL lovers do not like to hear.

You can read my review, if you're interested, but it's not in this comments section, but in the reviews section. It will surely make your eyes pop out of your head again, as it is equally extensive and, above all, it tells many truths that many BL lovers do not like to hear.

Thank you. I really liked the series, or rather, the first episode, and it motivated me to write the review.

Bomb! Total explosion. What an unexpected turn of events! Who could imagine this? If the series had already won me over, these latest events make the story much more interesting.

Really this is so good... I'm really looking forward to episode 3. "Be my bodyguard. I will tame you." Ha ha ha. The creators don't mess around and we can already see how the two boys are flirting. If this is the type of revenge that the synopsis talks about, let punishments and revenge come. Because of the way the two boys meet after a "bad step", it brings to mind other short films, films or Chinese series in which homosexuality is addressed in Chinese cinema and television, such as 'Capture Lover' , 'The Raccoon', 'Kinematic Theory', 'Uncontrolled Love', the three parts of 'Ghost Boyfriend', 'Love Is Not Easy to Have', 'Spring Fever', 'For Love, We Can', and many others .

And how could they know about Phum's sexuality, if the series hasn't explicitly told us anything about it? The two of them might have some remote idea about it, but they can't be absolutely sure of anything. And if I say that they could have a vague idea, it is from the fact that Phum, in episode 3, while the three friends are sitting at the table and Phum is distracted and his friends call his attention, Phum responds that a friend of his took a friend to a shopping center and left him abandoned, claiming that he was going to solve an errand, when in reality he wanted to play a prank on him. And when Beer tells him that the best thing his friend can do is ask for forgiveness, Phum blurts out and exaltedly says, "But I didn't do anything wrong." And this answer of course gave rise to some suspicion that Phum is hiding something unusual, since they have just discovered that Phum is skirting the issue so as not to ask a direct question about a topic that obviously bothers him or has him thinking, but I don't see how they can Beer and Mick relate this reaction of Phum to homosexuality so confidently. Then, in episode 4, as the three friends are walking down a staircase to go to lunch after class, Beer surprises Phum and asks him directly, "Have you apologized to your friend yet?" And Phum answers affirmatively, but he immediately realizes the mistake and says that he already told his friend to apologize to his friend. Of course, he failed to convince anyone. Beer and Mick know that he is hiding something, but I don't see any element or reason for Beer and Mick to have come to the conclusion that Phum is homosexual. I don't think I've missed any details. Although from then on they were able to see Phum near Pheem, nothing indicates anything safely or conclusively. The most suspicious thing was when they surprised the two of them on the couch in Phum's house, but despite this act being quite unusual for a heterosexual, they were not doing anything conclusive either, since there was no kissing or anything else. On the other hand, many heterosexuals like to "browse" without becoming homosexual.

It strikes me that they arrive at their friend Phum's house and find him with a boy in an “embarrassing” position and they do not choose to make fun of him even in a funny or humorous way, very common in these cases, or question him.

Other questions: Since I consider the relationship between Shane (Marc) and Pun (Poon) to be definitely real, what do we know about Beer and Mick? Is there a possibility of a PepperTee ship?

You're right, I should have specified which of the couples I was referring to, since there are 4. I agree that it is Phum. I like how Toey and Q have been getting closer to each other. In this one, Toey fell first, but Q soon got on the boat. The series gives me what I expect from a series of these characteristics.

Question: Who fell first? What do you think?

Thank you

How I enjoyed, in episode 3, the scene in which Tawan, Fae, Kai and Jidrid have lunch in temple areas. At one point, Kai (Kaownah) and Famous (Earth) exchange pieces of the fish they eat and Tawan says, "How sweet!" And they try the fish and answer: "It's not sweet. It's salty," and she laughs mischievously because she was not referring to the food, but to the budding relationship between the two boys.
And poor Jidrid suffers rejection from homophobes for being transsexual. These two are one of the topics addressed in the series, that is, homophobia and transsexuality.

In fact, to be able to see the film, I had a hard time, because I couldn't find it with subtitles in English or Spanish. The film is not in Tagalog, the most spoken language in the Philippines, which I don't know either. That's why I had to turn to a Filipino friend who knows the Visayan language, tell him where he can find the film and wait for him to translate it for me, if not completely at least the important issues.

I could say that I came across this film by mistake. I was searching MDL for another short film, 'Icarus' (伊卡洛斯的翅膀 / 'Yi Ka Luo Si De Chi Bang', a 2017 Taiwanese LGBT+-themed romantic drama written, directed and edited by filmmaker Alan Chen, for prepare a review, and I came across this short film of the same name by chance because it deals with practically the same topic, because I know the protagonists of other performances, because I liked the premise, I saw it, and thus the idea of ​​writing one also arose. review. You will surely like both.

My native language is Spanish.

I don't know the OST. At this moment I stopped watching the series because I'm watching other urgent things, but I would be interested in seeing it. I like the dynamic of those two fools who started living together under the same roof.

Thanks for the alert. I modified the text to make several issues clear. The problem, Selma, is that English is not my native language and I can make some mistakes because of this. Please, I would ask you to review it and point out any other errors. Thanks again.

1- At no point did I say that it was the first time I modified a review. I said, and I quote myself verbatim: "I don't change a single comma or word in most of my reviews. The MDL administrators could give their opinion on this." You could suggest that I point out that I have modified the review (and I may or may not accept your suggestion, since the MDL rules do not require me to do so), but you should not say that in doing so I am being manipulative, a term used the first time, or dishonest and lacking transparency and decency, terms used at this time.
2- Those modified reviews still fulfill their, and I quote: "main objective (of) is to help others decide if something is worth watching." The very fact of issuing my initial impressions and, if necessary, modifying them, maintains the purpose of adjusting to my right to review a film or a television program and, above all, of expressing the meaning of an audiovisual by applying a criterion. truthful and fair critic. There is nothing indecent or that demonstrates a lack of transparency and honesty in this action. As I said, I have some writing margin. I usually have to delete entire paragraphs to get the review within the allowed margin.
3- I think you are creating a storm in a glass of water. Because? Because the review, even modified, maintains its purpose of evaluating the quality, effectiveness and originality of the story, characters, images, sound and message of an audiovisual.
4- I don't remember having spoken with you at any other time before.
5- You don't have to know it, but before publishing the review I seek to obtain comments from other people, often other MDL users, with the aim of receiving an honest and constructive opinion about my work. I ask you to read my review and tell me what you liked and didn't like about it, what you agreed with and what you disagreed with, what you found confusing or unclear, and what you would suggest to improve it. I listen to comments and consider your views, but I also assume that my review is ultimately my own expression and opinion. I use other people's comments to revise and improve my review, but I remember to keep my voice and perspective intact.

Hello. You are wrong when you say that I seek to manipulate by seeking a "Yes" from people. If I tried to search for "Likes", don't you think it would be much easier for me to say what others would like to hear?
It is also not real that I write something and then at the end of the series I change everything after having guaranteed myself some "likes." I don't change a single comma or word in most of my reviews. MDL administrators could give their opinion on the matter.
I did modify the review for 'To Be Continued' several times (I couldn't say how many, but I would dare say more than 5 times and perhaps MDL will help provide the specific information). And not only did I change the review several times. From an initial 10 I reduced the rating in the end, but at the same time I clearly explained the reasons for my actions. Writing on a digital platform gives that possibility, an option that I do not have in a print, radio or television publication.
Did I change the review "without even indicating that you did so"? I have followed the steps indicated by MDL. At no time have I seen that I should indicate that I changed the review. I wouldn't find any difficulty if I had to do it. And on the other hand, can't the user change their "click" and say that "they no longer find the review useful"? I also have no problem if the user deletes the previously given "Like." I am not here looking for likes and smiles, but to express my opinion on the series, movies and short films that I like. What's more, if you notice, you'll find that I generally give high marks. And this is because I write about what I like and visualize what I like.
If I had imagined that 'To Be Continued' would disappoint me so greatly, I would never have written a review about the series for the simple reason that I had never seen the series.
MDL requires that reviews only have a limited number of words (I think it's up to 10,000). If I have the possibility of going beyond this limit, I could very well leave the initial review that you surely read and to which you gave a "Yes", and all the others up to this last and definitive one.
I hope I have satisfied all your doubts. But there is something true and I suppose it is the crux of the matter: I support and reaffirm each of the words and evaluations that you may find in the review today.