Her brain, did a factory reset and suddenly she wants him back??? what about him being selfish, not wanting kids…
While different interpretations of love may exist, not all interpretations qualify as genuine love. Many individuals mistakenly believe they have found love, unaware of what lies beyond their current situation, settling for less. In this particular case, the writers themselves depict love as codependency, responsibility, and commitment, which are more akin to the vows of marriage rather than true love. Because thatās the definition of love that they have over there.
Itās tricky because we often lack the ability to define what love truly is, as our perspectives are limited by our own life experiences and short lives. While you may believe that what you have is love, it doesnāt necessarily mean youāre correct. Genuine love exists beyond our grasp, and most people hold onto a diluted version of its true essence. Unless you grew up seeing real genuine love around you itās hard to recognize it.
Her brain, did a factory reset and suddenly she wants him back??? what about him being selfish, not wanting kids…
iām going to be a real bitch and say that I doubt what they have is love, itās codependency. all i have to say is that love doesnāt neglect you, itās unconditional, warm, doesnāt cheat on you. what they have isnāt love, sheās delusional. I understand what youāre saying, but itās not love, it just isnāt.
I see that everyone is here for the same reason. all I can say is that the rating going down overnight is well…
Her brain, did a factory reset and suddenly she wants him back??? what about him being selfish, not wanting kids and having the emotional availability and personality of a piece of cardboard ?? she chose a bum over a man willing to lick the ground she walks on?? if this is a representation of the state of mind of modern japanese women, I think someone should introduce them to the sprinkle sprinkle ideology. this is so pathetic girl get up.
Is FL like the girl, Hana, in ėķģ¬(Agency) Kdrama - rich, spoiled, has attitude, wants to prove herself,…
No, sheās not annoying or severely out of touch. Her spoiled behaviour is naive more than anything . They just donāt really address her privileges and nepotism. Both of those things are seen as cool hidden secrets. Its only frustrating if youāre like me š
Glorifying and showing what actually happens in real life are two different things... nepotism happens at work…
I think that most people, whoāve consumed various forms of media, are able to differentiate between reality and fiction. However, we also collectively agree to suspend our disbelief and still engage with media as if it were real, as this adds to the enjoyment of the experience. I know that this is fictional, but I still find it valuable to discuss the decisions made by the writers.
Yes, you can argue that there are worse nepotism offenders in dramaland, but this doesnāt negate the fact that from a moral standpoint concealing your true position is a form of power imbalance.
Also I beg to differ, a lot of the conflicts got resolved by her ability to outsource help because she is powerful and well connected. Her success and outward personality at work is only due to the absence of any genuine reasons for her to fear confrontation or negative repercussions. Can the writers at least address it?
To sum up, my main concern with this drama, despite my overall enjoyment of it, lies in its failure to address nepotism adequately and the lack of self-awareness in the main character. For viewers who have class awareness, this can be frustrating to watch.
Is FL like the girl, Hana, in ėķģ¬(Agency) Kdrama - rich, spoiled, has attitude, wants to prove herself,…
I think that she was still written to have spoiled traits, the drama itself repeatedly emphasizes the inside joke between her and the male lead about her refusal to accept delayed gratification. While there might be nothing inherently wrong with that, it is evident that her character is written to always expect to receive something. Her grandpa also ssaid that he sent her to work because she was too selfish. We also can especially see her spoiled behaviour it in the flashbacks.
I can't help but wonder what the writers were thinking when they crafted the FL's character as a spoiled heiress embarking on a journey to prove her independence as a woman. She secures a senior position through nepotism and thrives solely because she knows there's support behind the scenes. It's hard to believe that someone with a background in broadcasting, lacking any experience in navigation systems, could keep up with the engineering team. Did the writers actually intend for us to like her?
She takes pleasure in concealing her true power from her unsuspecting coworkers who mistakenly see her as one of them. Meanwhile, she belittles the working class ML, dismissing him as too meek towards his superiors. Meanwhile her audacity and fearlessness ONLY stem from the certainty that she'll emerge unscathed no matter what kind of mess she creates. Am I supposed to find her cool and relatable every time she scoffs in indifference when her poor coworkers fawn over her hidden connections and riches.
l like this drama, but the way it glorifies nepotism leaves a bitter aftertaste in my mouth. What is the message here?
We like Makoto because he actually brings something valuable to the table. Yoichi, on the other hand, lacks motivation…
My theory is that Michi continues to return to Yo due to her strong sense of responsibility and commitment stemming from their vows of marriage. She holds on to traditional values and suppresses her own feelings to maintain harmony. This behavior is evident in the latest episode, where she forgives him and rationalizes his infidelity. I hope the show addresses this aspect of her personality. Also I think she fears being abandoned by Yo because like she said on last episode, āYo is her only friendā (crazy?? girl go get some friends)
Yo, on the other hand, lacks any valid excuses. I find it hard to believe her claim of "running away from his problems." Having a medical issue does not justify withholding love and affection for years. He displays cruelty, selfishness, and prioritizes his own emotions over Michi's evident breakdown in front of him.
In my opinion, Makoto's wife isn't solely avoiding intimacy due to fear of pregnancy; she also takes advantage of Makoto's submissive nature, relying on him for all the relationship's responsibilities while advancing her own career. She didn't even worry about him leaving her earlier, being confident that he would always stay.
Overall, Iām genuinely enjoying this drama. The acting is good, and there's a certain depth to it. However, I truly hope that certain aspects will be addressed, and that the ending won't be disappointing.
It's not good to cheat but, Makato and Michi were reduced to roommates; it felt like their spouses were holding…
Yupp but I also acknowledge that ultimately, the interpretation of commitment and the expectations placed on partners can vary based on individual values, cultural norms, and personal experiences. Different individuals and cultures may have varying beliefs and values when it comes to the sanctity and absolute nature of commitment. Some may place great importance on vows and traditional values, emphasizing the endurance of a relationship regardless of circumstances.
Other people like us with a more practical outlook may believe that commitment should be rooted in genuine love and mutual effort, rather than just fulfilling societal expectations, maintaining a legal bond or vow.
You can interpret this drama from two very different perspectives depending on the person you are: an idealistic person who believes in the inherent ideal or sacred nature of commitment, where vows, tradition, and enduring through challenges holds the ultimate importance or a practical person who believe solely in emotional connection, effort, and compatibility. Thereās no real answer.
We like Makoto because he actually brings something valuable to the table. Yoichi, on the other hand, lacks motivation…
I knooow ughh. I wonder if they address it in the manga, because he seriously has nothing going on for him. She has to have some attachment and self worth issues and is blinded by his bad boy persona.
Is it fair to expect love and commitment from someone whom you deserted both physically and emotionally years ago? Is it fair to demand commitment from someone you know you are only with for the sake of your career or out of convenience, and because you benefit from their emotional, social, and financial contributions?
My answer is no, they donāt owe them commitment; not anymore. Are Makoto and Michi cheating? Yes. Do I blame them? No.
In my view, a marriage/relationship is not solely defined by a legal document but by the effort invested in it. Without active contributions from both parties, there is no genuine marriage/relationship. No effort = no relationship = no right to claim you were wronged. Donāt care if thereās a piece of paper or vow, If thereās no contribution and your partner deserts you emotionally, you are no longer in a relationship and no one should expect commitment from you. Emotional neglect is very serious and I consider it a form of abuse. Can't expect people to commit to ghosts.
Itās tricky because we often lack the ability to define what love truly is, as our perspectives are limited by our own life experiences and short lives. While you may believe that what you have is love, it doesnāt necessarily mean youāre correct. Genuine love exists beyond our grasp, and most people hold onto a diluted version of its true essence. Unless you grew up seeing real genuine love around you itās hard to recognize it.
Yes, you can argue that there are worse nepotism offenders in dramaland, but this doesnāt negate the fact that from a moral standpoint concealing your true position is a form of power imbalance.
Also I beg to differ, a lot of the conflicts got resolved by her ability to outsource help because she is powerful and well connected. Her success and outward personality at work is only due to the absence of any genuine reasons for her to fear confrontation or negative repercussions. Can the writers at least address it?
To sum up, my main concern with this drama, despite my overall enjoyment of it, lies in its failure to address nepotism adequately and the lack of self-awareness in the main character. For viewers who have class awareness, this can be frustrating to watch.
She takes pleasure in concealing her true power from her unsuspecting coworkers who mistakenly see her as one of them. Meanwhile, she belittles the working class ML, dismissing him as too meek towards his superiors. Meanwhile her audacity and fearlessness ONLY stem from the certainty that she'll emerge unscathed no matter what kind of mess she creates. Am I supposed to find her cool and relatable every time she scoffs in indifference when her poor coworkers fawn over her hidden connections and riches.
l like this drama, but the way it glorifies nepotism leaves a bitter aftertaste in my mouth. What is the message here?
Yo, on the other hand, lacks any valid excuses. I find it hard to believe her claim of "running away from his problems." Having a medical issue does not justify withholding love and affection for years. He displays cruelty, selfishness, and prioritizes his own emotions over Michi's evident breakdown in front of him.
In my opinion, Makoto's wife isn't solely avoiding intimacy due to fear of pregnancy; she also takes advantage of Makoto's submissive nature, relying on him for all the relationship's responsibilities while advancing her own career. She didn't even worry about him leaving her earlier, being confident that he would always stay.
Overall, Iām genuinely enjoying this drama. The acting is good, and there's a certain depth to it. However, I truly hope that certain aspects will be addressed, and that the ending won't be disappointing.
Other people like us with a more practical outlook may believe that commitment should be rooted in genuine love and mutual effort, rather than just fulfilling societal expectations, maintaining a legal bond or vow.
You can interpret this drama from two very different perspectives depending on the person you are: an idealistic person who believes in the inherent ideal or sacred nature of commitment, where vows, tradition, and enduring through challenges holds the ultimate importance or a practical person who believe solely in emotional connection, effort, and compatibility. Thereās no real answer.
Is it fair to expect love and commitment from someone whom you deserted both physically and emotionally years ago?
Is it fair to demand commitment from someone you know you are only with for the sake of your career or out of convenience, and because you benefit from their emotional, social, and financial contributions?
My answer is no, they donāt owe them commitment; not anymore. Are Makoto and Michi cheating? Yes. Do I blame them? No.
In my view, a marriage/relationship is not solely defined by a legal document but by the effort invested in it. Without active contributions from both parties, there is no genuine marriage/relationship. No effort = no relationship = no right to claim you were wronged. Donāt care if thereās a piece of paper or vow, If thereās no contribution and your partner deserts you emotionally, you are no longer in a relationship and no one should expect commitment from you. Emotional neglect is very serious and I consider it a form of abuse. Can't expect people to commit to ghosts.