lime_pickle

The most beautiful cat ever . . .

It's main flaw is that IS 'fluffy' though. Terribly fluffy compared to its early promise, to be a realistic depiction of casual sex and relationships between young, healthy and attractive people. E.g. the main leads end up together, the man develops 'feelings' for the tedious Nabi, however unrealistic that premise is, the 'sex' is fluffy and dispassionate, the FL has that very cliched kdrama blank face thing going on. And they must have spent a fortune on the gel lenses to shoot her through.

How do you know that's the role he'll play?

If you're telling people to 'shut up' because you disagree with them then you've already lost the argument.

'Sophie' doesn't do research - her MAGA cap keeps falling into her eyes when she tries to read anything beyond 3 sentences.

I think she thinks she looks younger when she shows no expression (no lines) but it has the opposite effect. Younger people tend to be more expressive and you learn to be more austere/stoic as you age. Compare the same-aged Gong Hyo-jin - who is always full of emotion and, as a consequence, looks youthful.

I'm pretty shocked by the number of people calling this 'anti Japanese propaganda' in the comments. You can't, as they say, polish a turd and the industrial scale rape and brutality visited upon hundreds of thousands of Korean/other Asian women and children forced to be 'comfort women' was a huge, steaming pile of it.

I don't recognise the text but later revelations, e.g. 'wargrave', suggest its an Agatha Christie novel - And Then There Were None.

Mr Queen mostly had a happy ending because they ended it before he died. But the drama didn't try give them different back stories (as they did, horribly, with Jang Ok-jung) nor did they wipe entire people from history.

I have excused LITM by thinking that it ended when he was still, say, 19 but appreciate that in reality he was married to the Chae Soo-bin character throughout the period depicted.

That would be hard, since that means no King Sunjo (so no Love in the Moonlight) and indirectly no Mr Queen, either.

I always read the history before, or alongside, the drama. The respectful way to give us a happy ending is to finish the drama before the bad things happen - Love in the Moonlight or Mr Queen, for example. But I hate them changing what we know as fact just to appease.

Thank you.

Is this a drama or a film?

I'd forgotten about the super cute little kids who live in her apartment building. They're freakin hilarious.

Except that this isn't censorship. The powers that be haven't banned this drama. Instead ordinary people, objecting to things they find offensive are reacting to it.

Yes, I read the statement and had already researched the facts. You should try the latter some time.

It's entertainment but it's moronic in its execution. Imagine, if you will, a drama about the Holocaust which pictured Jewish people as exhibiting the (false) negative stereotypes that the Nazis accused them of at the time. Still entertaining? Being 'North Korean spies' was one of the FALSE things that the dodgy government/security services of the day accused the democracy movement of.

It's fiction but it's tone deaf fiction. Imagine, if you will, a drama about the Holocaust which pictured Jewish people as exhibiting the (false) negative stereotypes that the Nazis accused them of at the time. Still 'only fiction'?

It has a low rating, I suspect, because it doesn't appeal to the teenage/middle-aged Sasaengs who form a sizable chunk of the MDL audience. But I agree with you that it's a beautiful film.