oppa_

Over and over we are told of the importance of giving life a chance while through a character's selfishness or singlemindedness lives are put at unnecessary risk.
Only new life matter, old people should just die for a cheater couple

Well her career was nothing more then a cheater woman, who seduces other woman's finance for sex.

No wonder south korea's birth rate improve after this drama 😜

it was basically a fraud marriage without disclosing his marital status and his children whom that woman become mother of without her knowing anything.

Yes, exactly—that’s what I was trying to say. From his side, he wasn’t trying to destroy her or harm her deliberately. But being married doesn’t automatically stop someone from feeling tempted or acting out of lust or selfishness. Men like him often think they can get away with subtle flirting or even start something like an office affair or a drunken one-night stand, especially if they believe the other person is interested.

In this case, he completely misread her and when things didn’t go as he wanted, he was humiliated. Instead of taking responsibility for what he did or how he acted, he shut down and left her to deal with everything on her own. Not because he wanted her to suffer—but because he was scared. Scared of being exposed, of facing his wife, and of owning up to what he was actually trying to do.

So, to protect himself, he went into defense mode and ended up shifting the blame onto her. That’s what makes the situation even worse—his silence and avoidance weren’t just about guilt, they were also a way to survive and maintain his reputation, even if it meant she got hurt in the process. That’s why I think he’s not a pure villain, but definitely morally weak and selfish.

Yes, I understand now that the real issue is that he framed her, allowed damaging rumors to spread, and even let his wife publicly humiliate her—all without ever stepping in to clarify the truth. That was cruel, and it’s obvious he took advantage of his higher position to punish her socially and emotionally. And sadly, everyone around her played along without ever hearing her side.

I see him clearly as someone who wronged an innocent woman. He should absolutely be held accountable—for workplace bullying, defamation, and abuse of power. That’s where his guilt lies.

But what I was trying to say is that what he did doesn’t quite fall under sexual harassment, at least not in the legal or direct sense. She was never touched, coerced, or propositioned. The rumors and mistreatment weren’t initiated for sexual gain, even if they gave off that implication. So her accusing him of sexual harassment might appear as if she’s trying to label him as a predator to destroy his image, which can be dangerous—especially when the actual wrongdoing (defamation and bullying) is already serious and valid enough on its own.

Of course, that doesn't mean she’s exaggerating everything or that her trauma isn’t real. She’s clearly being harassed in her workplace, emotionally and professionally. I just feel we should be precise in naming the kind of abuse happening—so it can be addressed correctly. That’s all I was trying to say.

in court, this kind of claim wouldn't hold because legally, sexual harassment requires either unwelcome physical advances, clear verbal conduct of a sexual nature, or a power imbalance being used specifically to obtain sexual favors. But in this case, she was the one who leaned in first (even if it was innocent), and there was no kiss, no touch, and no direct proposition.

His defense lawyer would absolutely tear that apart, probably arguing she initiated closeness, and everything else was just misinterpretation or office gossip. That doesn’t mean she wasn’t mistreated — but legally, sexual harassment is a very specific charge, and what happened doesn’t meet that threshold. He should be sued for office bullying, defamation, and abuse of power, not for a crime he didn't commit.

maybe he is still promising minor girl roles in his dramas.

at least he provide free minor girls to other pedos in cast

What can I do? That’s exactly the issue — shows like Love Alarm and many others blur the lines between sexual assault and romance, just because the guy is conventionally attractive. A kiss without consent magically becomes “romantic” if he looks good and broods a little. And the worst part? Viewers eat it up.

So now we’ve got a generation of self-centered narcissists who believe that as long as they’re good looking, any move they make will be seen as “passion” — not harassment. That’s not just bad storytelling, it’s dangerous messaging.

So yeah, I’m not mad at shows that actually teach consent. I’m mad at the hypocrisy — the double standard that excuses harassment when it’s done by a handsome lead, and then crucifies others for far less when it fits the narrative.

If we’re going to teach consent, then let’s actually teach it — consistently. Not just when it’s convenient or when the guy isn’t wearing a leather jacket and smirking.

He was literally asleep when she leaned way too close — whether she meant well or not, invading someone's personal space like that is still a choice. He misread it in that moment, thought she was making a move, and the second it was cleared up, he backed off. He never even kissed her — he tried to, because of a misunderstanding. There was no assault. No force. Just a moment of awkward confusion.

Now suddenly she wants to press charges? That feels less like justice and more like revenge.
It’s like two coworkers flirt, drink, kiss — date for a month — and when it ends badly, one suddenly rewrites that first kiss as non-consensual. That’s dangerous.

Misunderstandings happen. But reframing consensual or unclear moments after a fallout just to hurt the other person isn’t empowerment — it’s manipulation.

And the irony? You people are out here trying to frame a fictional character for sexual harassment when it didn’t even happen — but turn around and defend actual predators like Lee Geung-young. Make it make sense.

Funny how everyone says “a married man shouldn't read signals” — yes, that's what he's supposed to do. But what about all those dramas where the married ML is out there catching feelings and having full-blown affairs, and it's all shown with soft lighting and sad music?

Like:

Love Affairs in the Afternoon — both leads married, yet somehow we’re made to root for them?

On the Way to the Airport — emotional cheating dressed up as “deep connection.”

Well a married man wanted to have an affair outside, many of this man do that...
I don't drive my female colleague around unless I know them at personal level,
I had called cabs for few of them but I won't give them rides, unless they are friends or I might have any other personal relation with them.
He was asleep and when he open his eye he saw her very close to him..
He misunderstanding her fastening seat belt into attempt to kiss...

well i have watched 10 so
will surely finish it by ignoring that Fake sexual harassment case

The father of the children remains a true Japanese pervert who tricked a young woman into marriage.

I understand your frustration, but you're placing all the blame on the man as if he's supposed to be a mind reader. He was asleep when she leaned in, and without any context, physical proximity can easily be misinterpreted—especially when it’s coming from someone who’s been emotionally close for months.

You say she didn’t initiate closeness—but working late consistently, letting him drive her home every night, never setting boundaries, and acting emotionally intimate all send mixed signals. He’s a married man, and she knew that. So why maintain that closeness if not emotionally invested? That’s not how most professional relationships work.

And as for him being a "photocopy of her dead father"—sure, she saw him that way, but how would he know that? There’s no rulebook saying, “if you look like someone’s dad, they see you platonically.” He doesn’t magically know he’s a father figure to her unless she tells him. If anything, it would confuse him more.

He absolutely crossed the line when he framed her—no defending that—but let’s not pretend everything before that was clear-cut or one-sided. Emotional responsibility works both ways.

The main story is pretty basic. A young tutor/nanny and her widower boss fall in love in the most nonsensical way
He fell in love with her when she was 12-13 and he was a married man, that is not basic at all

Well first get close to a guy
Give him wrong signals
Then lean on his side when he is asleep
And then accuse him of sexual harrasment...

then don't wait

dear Hyeri remake soo fast with at least better actors casting

Whole Dorama can't rely on a single person actor,
Kentaro might give his best but it what if others just follow director and do there parts without any emotional investment in character.