there is 26 year old man who look more like 30+ man pretending to be a school kid
34+ shin hye sun look so younger then this Ajusshi looking school bully
Bully look like 34 while shin hye sun look like mid 20s
I can understand that you casted a big name like Shin hye sun so you don't have money for big ML actor
but could have casted a guy that look younger then his Age to fit in a student role
SHIN HYE SUN did amazing here 20/10 for her Acting
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
there one problem jus One for me
Everything was good fine, more the fine it was goodbut why did our Female lead shows Sympathy toward cheater wife that she become her secret keeper
she did not tell kim soo jin that his wife is cheating on him so he won't be hurt, but everything that happen in this show was result of her cheating
she kidnaped her own child for that very reason
even after knowing everything our Lead hero isn't that angry on his wife but even try to save the man that was screwing his wife and was plan to ruin him
ML is so perfect that he become emotionless machine at the end of it.
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Half of is re-watch able
Drama was watchable until FL's secret got exposed to her husbandML was a illigimate bastard who think his step mother should love him,
was entitled
grandmother got forgiven at last for being a old thief, that Old bitch should be kicked out from not only there house but from whole korea
ML was Most Idiot Man in whole show that was big reason his own wife never trusted him.
Most annoying character was Crazy Uncle, the way he talk about his thief mother and how he behaves with his sister in law was so irritating
he was so disrespectful towards his sister in law
everything wrong was created by that old bitch for money and she was forgiven so easily
FL was doing everything for her dead sister but that Old bitch stole someone child for Money there was no real feelings inside that old slut
Idiot ML sided with a old thief who dtole him from his mother for money,
how he was able to forgive her has he had no self esteem at all
at first i ignore his attitude but at second watch it all irritating
how he treated his stepmother and how that old Bitch garanny treated everyone while she was one wrong in all that
that old bitch until the end never apologize for her wrong attitude towards her daughter in law
and that Crazy uncle should have burn alive for what a jerk he was in whole show
such a ass licker for his moma...
and ML was same little baby for his granny still sucking milk from that old hags nipples
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
first time seen equality in office romance
Male lead and female lead start as bickering friends, but unlike other in this drama female isn't submissive kindest girl but she is real human who know how to fight back and defend herself which also help male lead look more cute then some arrogant shit we usually see in dramasi really like this drama without any unnecessary twist
only the weak love triangle was unnecessary
Ep 6 assistant of ML
During a game told he had been in more then 10 relationship, was appreciated for it, if it would have been a woman she would be look down upon but for a man to have 10 past relationship are Impressive,
Doesn't that mean he has been failed in those 10 relationships so how that is impressive when you are saying you had broken up 10 times because there was some problem in relationships.
How it is still impressive for a man and look down upon when woman had more then 10 relationships.
my favorite couple was YU sung and ho young
light romcom
xx
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Same shit because man is dying and making a sad face
So because this man is dying and can make a pitiful faceevery woman should kneel and take his Cookie in there mouth and then enjoy it
because he is dying he should be loved by everyone and you can donate your girlfriend, lover even your wife to Dying man
so he can dying after he enjoy every woman he has around him
JUST because he know he is dying he is entitled to do anything he want and everything is right as long as he die
he can kick his wife sleep around and then come back and ask his wife to give him a good BJ because he is DYING
EVERYTHING IS JUSTIFIED because this MAN is DYING, how man drama showing this same shit again and again that this person is dying so he will F$$K everyone before he DIE
$ex is most important before dying and should be with as many partner as many you can make them pity you
being inhuman is justified as long as you DIE
fact every human die but they do not get Luxury to know when they DIE but as long as you get this Luxury to know when you will Die you can do anything now because there is no Conqueses of your action
You can murder people, you can rape people, you can cheat people you can scam people, you can play with there feeling, you can be hit anyone as much as you want
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
what a luxury benefit of dying this Drama shows
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Incest glorified
how incest is glorifiedBrother sister incest was Glorification by calling there lust love
girl even married an innocent man and make his life hell without even guilt then leave him and goes around sleeping with her brother
its hard to even put 500 word for this groas shit
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Gold digger get what the want in End
Story was just 2 episode while they stretch it a bubble gum till 16our FL , Ji Na a typical gold digger want to seduce another Gold digger
whole drama is crap,
our ML is most idiot Dr we can ever see on this earth fall for a gold digger who ignore him like he is shit until he become rich
SML is a gold digger who get whole company to him because he cheated in his girlfriend with FL
HIS girlfriend Another prideless human garbage
she know he is cheating but waiting for him to get rejected by other girl because she know he is a garbage and will come to her in end because she is also garbage
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Forceful ending them together
Male lead cheated on her 3year ago she don't let go of him give him false forgiveness and then uses that to justify her own self, it was he choice to forgive and move on, if she was unable to do so she should have let go of him,1st couple end up together was fair both of them cheated
but 2nd couple was forced, even after knowing that your husband is waiting for your death so he could go to other woman , it better to even die then wait and live with that kind of inhuman Monster
other man was too self absorbed to be in love with anyone other then himself,
he uses his wife for almost 20 years without any guilt and saying love you to other woman and come and sleep with his wife
went to hotel with someone else wife while he talk about law
there talk lack logic
Female told wife she never wanted to have him, but she went to hotel they stay there for hours, why you go to hotel
1st couple might be in love but they Love can not last without Trust
and for 2nd couple they were never in love Man was simple using a poor woman to have kids and cook for his Witch mother
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
will show all screentime with one brother at first then other will be tragic childhood lover boi
Already whole story is out there to see this idioticPark Eun Bin made a huge mistake of taking a drama without any story just because she think she can sell shit by just being park Eun Bin
15 year and she look like that on that kind of place......go watch blue lagoon then make this mess
fake tragic story at the start of show just ruin the mood, Acting is so bad
unnecessary making thing hard,
that ship doesn't have any security because Korea is lawless country ?
anyone can enter in that ship because there is no ticket system in Korea
Ki ho just press factory reset key in his head and deleted all memories and is now working on default jerk mode that every Korean man is born with.
director decide to pair her with older brother first then at last few episode it will be reveled that other brother is ki ho so our FL will switch her love and affection to her childhood mode and there tragic love story will become more tragic by turning down older brother because she doesn't care about her current feeling but what happen 15 year ago
it wasn't ki ho who saved her , he just come and offer her shoes.
Nice guy should never get girl because girl is not nice...
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Positively Yours’: When Irresponsibility Is Framed as Romance”
A woman is forced to carry the responsibility of pregnancy simply because she had a one-night stand, while the man who refused to use protection can walk away. Even if he later “takes responsibility,” he will never go through pregnancy, labor pain, or childbirth. That burden is forced on the woman by nature alone.And what if she’s married? What if she doesn’t want to be involved with him, doesn’t want to marry him, or doesn’t want to be a mother at all? Consent to sex is not consent to pregnancy—something even married couples decide together.
Not using protection isn’t a tragic flaw or romantic complexity; it’s basic irresponsibility and a lack of respect. It strips a woman of choice and forces life-altering consequences onto her without consent.
When a show presents this casually, people are completely justified in criticizing it—even after just one episode.
The show treats stalking as if it’s romantic concern. Finding her address without consent, watching her from a distance, intruding into her personal life, and interrogating her choices are framed as “caring.” This is not concern—it’s surveillance. If this were happening in real life, it would be frightening, not flattering.
What’s even more disturbing is how the narrative openly pressures her to carry and deliver his baby. She is not asked what she wants. She is not given space to decide. Instead, she is pushed, cornered, and emotionally coerced—then told to “at least try” dating him. Not because she desires it, not because she consented, but because he decided this is how things should go.
This is not courtship. He is not requesting the chance to get to know her. He is imposing rules—meeting three times a week, maintaining contact, staying involved—despite her clear discomfort. That is control, not romance.
The woman is reduced to a function: a womb with obligations. Her autonomy, freedom, and right to refuse are treated as inconveniences that the story expects her to “grow out of.” This framing dehumanizes her, turning her into a baby-making machine whose life must now revolve around a man’s mistake and entitlement.
Calling this “love” or “responsibility” is dishonest. It is forced intimacy dressed up as destiny.
When dramas normalize this behavior, they are not exploring moral complexity—they are promoting a deeply regressive idea: that a woman’s body and future can be claimed once sex occurs, regardless of her will. That is not romantic. That is coercive. And yes, it is barbaric.
So no, viewers don’t need to “watch more episodes” to criticize this. When a show casually excuses stalking, erases consent, and glorifies the stripping of a woman’s freedom, one episode is more than enough to recognize the problem.
He is the president of the company she works for. He holds institutional authority over her career, her future, and her daily professional life. She was selected to study in Germany—something she genuinely wanted, something that represents independence, growth, and a future beyond him. That context matters.
So when he says things like, “It’s your choice whether you keep the baby or not,” those words are meaningless. Consent cannot exist under intimidation. A choice made while someone controls your job, your visa prospects, and your professional future is not a real choice—it’s pressure disguised as politeness.
His actions repeatedly contradict his words. While claiming to respect her decision, he continuously pushes, manipulates, and corners her into keeping the pregnancy. While acknowledging her refusal to marry him, he still forces the idea of marriage onto her, treating her clear NO as something temporary, negotiable, or irrelevant.
This is textbook coercion.
Emotional coercion.
Economic coercion.
Professional coercion.
The show normalizes a deeply disturbing dynamic where a powerful man uses his position to override a woman’s autonomy, then masks it with soft dialogue so the audience is expected to see him as “responsible” or “misunderstood.” He is neither.
Saying “it’s your choice” while actively sabotaging her ability to choose is manipulation, not respect. Ignoring her refusal and continuing to push marriage and forced intimacy is not persistence—it’s entitlement.
When a drama frames this as romance instead of abuse, it isn’t just bad writing. It’s dangerous storytelling. It teaches that women’s boundaries don’t matter if a man is powerful, persistent, or emotionally invested enough.
And that is exactly why criticism after just one—or two—episodes is not premature. The message is already loud and clear.
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Park Yu-Ho acted better than two grown-ass adult lead actors. Either he’s genuinely that good, or the adult characters were written as cliché, pointless bickerers with zero depth.The male lead is an immature man-child — something we’ve already seen a hundred times in Korean dramas. Nothing new. Same recycled trope again and again.
The love triangle is painfully obvious:
Female lead ↔ her boss (former college friend / crush) ↔ male lead.
The bickering was fun only until episode 3. From episode 4 onward, the fights had no reason to exist.
The male lead just talks nonsense all day. No logic, no reasoning — he just says whatever comes to his mind, even when it makes absolutely zero sense. It’s exhausting, not entertaining.
Park Yu-Ho, despite being just a 2-year-old, outperformed everyone — without any help from the writers. He had more personality, maturity, and presence than the adult male lead. That alone says everything about how badly the lead character is written.
Nowadays, Korean dramas seem obsessed with either making babies or taking care of babies. Ironically, this show actually discourages people from having kids. It clearly shows how grown adults can’t even take care of themselves — so how are they supposed to raise another fragile human life?
The male lead is extremely selfish, especially considering his so-called “trauma.” He was abandoned by his older brother in an orphanage, and because of that, he wants his own nephew to be abandoned and sent to an orphanage as well.
What kind of sick logic is that?
If he suffered from abandonment, he should want to prevent the same thing from happening to his nephew — not recreate it just so he can feel validated about his own past. Instead of breaking the cycle, he wants to repeat it.
That’s not trauma — that’s selfishness, immaturity, and terrible writing.
Was this review helpful to you?
A Lion Out of Chains: A Review of The Queen Who Crown
1.OThe Queen Who Crown is an ambitious drama that dives deep into themes of power, freedom, and the complex dynamics between a King and Queen. While it aims to showcase strong characters, particularly the Queen, its portrayal raises questions about how strength and power are depicted, especially in women.
The Queen is undeniably a force to be reckoned with, but her strength is portrayed through a lens of relentless control and ruthless ambition. Having tasted power, she clings to it with an almost manic determination, willing to go to any lengths to retain it—even if it means betrayal, manipulation, or worse. While this makes for a dramatic and compelling narrative, it risks perpetuating a troubling message: that power corrupts women more destructively than men.
The King, on the other hand, is shown as a character rediscovering his agency. Once a passive, seemingly submissive figure overshadowed by his controlling wife, he emerges as a lion unchained when he ascends the throne. His transformation feels empowering, a reclamation of identity and freedom. However, his rise contrasts sharply with the Queen’s descent, which leans heavily into the trope of a “power-hungry woman.”
The drama’s intention to showcase a strong woman is clear, but its execution falters. A truly strong woman doesn’t have to be depicted as heartless or consumed by power at the expense of others. The Queen’s actions, from betrayal to outright scheming against her King, paint a picture of a character more concerned with domination than leadership. While this may serve the narrative tension, it inadvertently suggests that women in power are inherently prone to corruption and cruelty—a troubling implication.
In contrast, the King’s character arc suggests that freedom and strength are inherently virtuous when reclaimed by a man. This dichotomy may leave viewers questioning the fairness of the drama’s messaging. Does it challenge the status quo, or does it reinforce outdated stereotypes?
Ultimately, The Queen Who Crown is a captivating tale of power and transformation, but it walks a fine line. While its portrayal of the Queen adds layers of intrigue, it risks overshadowing the nuance of what a strong, empowered woman can truly be. Strength doesn’t have to equate to ruthlessness, and power doesn’t have to corrupt. The drama might have done well to balance its depiction of ambition and morality, especially in its female lead.
2.O
The Queen Who Crown offers a gripping exploration of power dynamics, desires, and the shifting sands of authority within a royal marriage. The character development of the King is particularly striking, as his transformation is nothing short of a revelation.
Before ascending to the throne, the King was portrayed as a subdued, almost docile partner—more his wife's pet than her equal. The Queen, accustomed to control, treated him as a submissive weakling, and he played the part well. But as the crown settled on his head, so did a newfound freedom and ferocity, one that reveals the depth of what he had repressed.
His evolution is both exhilarating and unsettling. The King’s untamed side begins to surface, a lion unshackled from chains, roaring with the power he now wields. The narrative brilliantly peels back the layers of his character, showing the desires and ambitions he had hidden beneath a quiet exterior. It’s fascinating to see how much he had bottled up, waiting for the right moment to emerge.
Meanwhile, the Queen’s journey takes a different turn. She is left grappling with the loss of control she once took for granted. Her attempts to reclaim power are as desperate as they are calculated, painting a vivid picture of a ruler who underestimated her counterpart. Her habits of domination, once effortless, now seem futile against the King’s burgeoning autonomy.
The dynamic between the two is electrifying—a dance of dominance and defiance, love and resentment. The storytelling captures the raw emotion and tension that come with shifting power. The King’s transformation feels liberating, while the Queen’s struggle to adapt to her diminishing influence makes for compelling drama.
The Queen Who Crown is an enthralling tale of identity, freedom, and the complexities of power. The King’s journey from submissive to sovereign is as captivating as the Queen’s realization that the reins are slipping from her grasp. It’s a must-read for anyone who enjoys stories of transformation and the unpredictable nature of relationships at the highest stakes.
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
This ancient Playboys
Description says ML is Playboy of 1600she has been dating many girls
but dating was invented after 1600s so how you describe what he was doing as dating because dating did not exist in that era
Playboys in that era were killed by girls family
or he specialises in dating orphans
in those time China Virginity was as important as life for a woman and they easily give it him and then remain single whole life because on one gone marry A second hand woman according to that era
so there were no consequence of his actions at all.
Was this review helpful to you?
A Mirror to Every Self-Righteous Fool — The Tragic Comedy of Mr. Kim
After watching the first episode, I have to say the drama does an amazing job portraying its characters. The writing, pacing, and especially Ryu Seung Ryong’s performance are phenomenal. He plays Mr. Kim with such realism that you almost feel uncomfortable watching him — not because he’s badly written, but because he’s exactly the kind of person you meet in real life.But despite the drama’s description, I don’t see Mr. Kim as a hero. He isn’t a humble man who lost his way — he’s an arrogant, self-centered individual who hides his jealousy and inferiority behind the mask of “hard work” and “morality.” He convinces himself that only his way of living — serving a private company for a paycheck — is honest, while anyone earning differently must be corrupt or undeserving.
The perfect example is his attitude toward his so-called “jobless” friend who owns an eight-story building. Instead of feeling inspired or happy for him, Mr. Kim mocks and belittles him to protect his ego. His logic is pathetic — by his definition, even shareholders, business owners, or landlords are “jobless,” while he, the obedient salaryman, is the only one living “the right way.”
In truth, Mr. Kim isn’t glorifying hard work — he’s glorifying slave mentality. He worships the system that exploits him and believes serving a company faithfully is some kind of moral virtue. What’s tragic is that he feels proud of owning a flat, yet can’t see the bigger picture — owning a flat isn’t the same as owning land. His juniors, who he looks down on, are already investing in real estate and building wealth, while he’s stuck polishing his illusion of stability. He owns walls, not freedom — a symbol of how small his world really is.
It’s like he’s driving an old Hyundai while his juniors are in Rolls-Royces — a perfect metaphor for how wide the gap has grown between his delusion of success and their reality. One day, when that company he worships kicks him out just like he once kicked his own friend out, he’ll finally see the “real world” he keeps preaching about.
So far, The Dream Life of Mr. Kim isn’t a hero’s journey — it’s a painfully accurate portrait of a man destroyed by pride, jealousy, and blind loyalty to a system that never cared about him in the first place.
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Blind Devotion: When Motherly Love Turns into Selective Compassion"
In Iron Family, the portrayal of the family dynamic raises complex questions about parental love, favoritism, and autonomy, especially concerning the female lead, who is blind. While the series aims to highlight resilience and familial bonds, it also showcases troubling dynamics where the mother’s intense focus on her blind daughter feels more like pity-driven attachment than respect for her as an individual.The female lead’s blindness is used as a focal point for her interactions, and at times, it seems she leverages this condition to receive undue favors or sympathy. While her challenges are understandable, her actions often appear to cross into manipulation, using her disability to gain advantages that others might not. Rather than portraying her as a nuanced character dealing with the complexities of disability, she sometimes comes across as someone who exploits the goodwill of others, subtly reinforcing harmful stereotypes.
The mother’s character is perhaps even more problematic. The overwhelming attention she gives to her blind daughter overshadows her relationships with her other children, who are largely ignored unless they serve her primary focus. This dynamic creates an unhealthy environment, suggesting that only those who are "special" or "in need" deserve unconditional love and attention, while the "normal" siblings are left feeling unloved and undervalued. Such favoritism can have lasting psychological effects, fostering resentment and a sense of inadequacy in the other children.
Though the mother is depicted as a selfless, caring figure, her actions imply otherwise. Her love seems conditional, and rather than empowering her daughter, she inadvertently stifles her independence, treating her with a pity that undermines true respect. This lack of respect fails to recognize the blind daughter as a whole person, capable of agency and dignity beyond her disability. In reality, this kind of overprotectiveness can be incredibly harmful, perpetuating dependency and robbing the daughter of the chance to lead a fuller, autonomous life.
In short, Iron Family brings attention to the bonds and struggles of a family dealing with disability, but its execution risks reinforcing stereotypes and fostering unhealthy family dynamics. By presenting favoritism and pity-driven love as normal or even noble, the show misses an opportunity to depict a more balanced, respectful family relationship that encourages all members' growth and well-being.
Was this review helpful to you?

