This review may contain spoilers
Half of is re-watch able
Drama was watchable until FL's secret got exposed to her husbandML was a illigimate bastard who think his step mother should love him,
was entitled
grandmother got forgiven at last for being a old thief, that Old bitch should be kicked out from not only there house but from whole korea
ML was Most Idiot Man in whole show that was big reason his own wife never trusted him.
Most annoying character was Crazy Uncle, the way he talk about his thief mother and how he behaves with his sister in law was so irritating
he was so disrespectful towards his sister in law
everything wrong was created by that old bitch for money and she was forgiven so easily
FL was doing everything for her dead sister but that Old bitch stole someone child for Money there was no real feelings inside that old slut
Idiot ML sided with a old thief who dtole him from his mother for money,
how he was able to forgive her has he had no self esteem at all
at first i ignore his attitude but at second watch it all irritating
how he treated his stepmother and how that old Bitch garanny treated everyone while she was one wrong in all that
that old bitch until the end never apologize for her wrong attitude towards her daughter in law
and that Crazy uncle should have burn alive for what a jerk he was in whole show
such a ass licker for his moma...
and ML was same little baby for his granny still sucking milk from that old hags nipples
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
first time seen equality in office romance
Male lead and female lead start as bickering friends, but unlike other in this drama female isn't submissive kindest girl but she is real human who know how to fight back and defend herself which also help male lead look more cute then some arrogant shit we usually see in dramasi really like this drama without any unnecessary twist
only the weak love triangle was unnecessary
Ep 6 assistant of ML
During a game told he had been in more then 10 relationship, was appreciated for it, if it would have been a woman she would be look down upon but for a man to have 10 past relationship are Impressive,
Doesn't that mean he has been failed in those 10 relationships so how that is impressive when you are saying you had broken up 10 times because there was some problem in relationships.
How it is still impressive for a man and look down upon when woman had more then 10 relationships.
my favorite couple was YU sung and ho young
light romcom
xx
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Same shit because man is dying and making a sad face
So because this man is dying and can make a pitiful faceevery woman should kneel and take his Cookie in there mouth and then enjoy it
because he is dying he should be loved by everyone and you can donate your girlfriend, lover even your wife to Dying man
so he can dying after he enjoy every woman he has around him
JUST because he know he is dying he is entitled to do anything he want and everything is right as long as he die
he can kick his wife sleep around and then come back and ask his wife to give him a good BJ because he is DYING
EVERYTHING IS JUSTIFIED because this MAN is DYING, how man drama showing this same shit again and again that this person is dying so he will F$$K everyone before he DIE
$ex is most important before dying and should be with as many partner as many you can make them pity you
being inhuman is justified as long as you DIE
fact every human die but they do not get Luxury to know when they DIE but as long as you get this Luxury to know when you will Die you can do anything now because there is no Conqueses of your action
You can murder people, you can rape people, you can cheat people you can scam people, you can play with there feeling, you can be hit anyone as much as you want
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
what a luxury benefit of dying this Drama shows
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Incest glorified
how incest is glorifiedBrother sister incest was Glorification by calling there lust love
girl even married an innocent man and make his life hell without even guilt then leave him and goes around sleeping with her brother
its hard to even put 500 word for this groas shit
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
GROSS Gross
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Gold digger get what the want in End
Story was just 2 episode while they stretch it a bubble gum till 16our FL , Ji Na a typical gold digger want to seduce another Gold digger
whole drama is crap,
our ML is most idiot Dr we can ever see on this earth fall for a gold digger who ignore him like he is shit until he become rich
SML is a gold digger who get whole company to him because he cheated in his girlfriend with FL
HIS girlfriend Another prideless human garbage
she know he is cheating but waiting for him to get rejected by other girl because she know he is a garbage and will come to her in end because she is also garbage
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Forceful ending them together
Male lead cheated on her 3year ago she don't let go of him give him false forgiveness and then uses that to justify her own self, it was he choice to forgive and move on, if she was unable to do so she should have let go of him,1st couple end up together was fair both of them cheated
but 2nd couple was forced, even after knowing that your husband is waiting for your death so he could go to other woman , it better to even die then wait and live with that kind of inhuman Monster
other man was too self absorbed to be in love with anyone other then himself,
he uses his wife for almost 20 years without any guilt and saying love you to other woman and come and sleep with his wife
went to hotel with someone else wife while he talk about law
there talk lack logic
Female told wife she never wanted to have him, but she went to hotel they stay there for hours, why you go to hotel
1st couple might be in love but they Love can not last without Trust
and for 2nd couple they were never in love Man was simple using a poor woman to have kids and cook for his Witch mother
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
will show all screentime with one brother at first then other will be tragic childhood lover boi
Already whole story is out there to see this idioticPark Eun Bin made a huge mistake of taking a drama without any story just because she think she can sell shit by just being park Eun Bin
15 year and she look like that on that kind of place......go watch blue lagoon then make this mess
fake tragic story at the start of show just ruin the mood, Acting is so bad
unnecessary making thing hard,
that ship doesn't have any security because Korea is lawless country ?
anyone can enter in that ship because there is no ticket system in Korea
Ki ho just press factory reset key in his head and deleted all memories and is now working on default jerk mode that every Korean man is born with.
director decide to pair her with older brother first then at last few episode it will be reveled that other brother is ki ho so our FL will switch her love and affection to her childhood mode and there tragic love story will become more tragic by turning down older brother because she doesn't care about her current feeling but what happen 15 year ago
it wasn't ki ho who saved her , he just come and offer her shoes.
Nice guy should never get girl because girl is not nice...
Was this review helpful to you?
A Lion Out of Chains: A Review of The Queen Who Crown
1.OThe Queen Who Crown is an ambitious drama that dives deep into themes of power, freedom, and the complex dynamics between a King and Queen. While it aims to showcase strong characters, particularly the Queen, its portrayal raises questions about how strength and power are depicted, especially in women.
The Queen is undeniably a force to be reckoned with, but her strength is portrayed through a lens of relentless control and ruthless ambition. Having tasted power, she clings to it with an almost manic determination, willing to go to any lengths to retain it—even if it means betrayal, manipulation, or worse. While this makes for a dramatic and compelling narrative, it risks perpetuating a troubling message: that power corrupts women more destructively than men.
The King, on the other hand, is shown as a character rediscovering his agency. Once a passive, seemingly submissive figure overshadowed by his controlling wife, he emerges as a lion unchained when he ascends the throne. His transformation feels empowering, a reclamation of identity and freedom. However, his rise contrasts sharply with the Queen’s descent, which leans heavily into the trope of a “power-hungry woman.”
The drama’s intention to showcase a strong woman is clear, but its execution falters. A truly strong woman doesn’t have to be depicted as heartless or consumed by power at the expense of others. The Queen’s actions, from betrayal to outright scheming against her King, paint a picture of a character more concerned with domination than leadership. While this may serve the narrative tension, it inadvertently suggests that women in power are inherently prone to corruption and cruelty—a troubling implication.
In contrast, the King’s character arc suggests that freedom and strength are inherently virtuous when reclaimed by a man. This dichotomy may leave viewers questioning the fairness of the drama’s messaging. Does it challenge the status quo, or does it reinforce outdated stereotypes?
Ultimately, The Queen Who Crown is a captivating tale of power and transformation, but it walks a fine line. While its portrayal of the Queen adds layers of intrigue, it risks overshadowing the nuance of what a strong, empowered woman can truly be. Strength doesn’t have to equate to ruthlessness, and power doesn’t have to corrupt. The drama might have done well to balance its depiction of ambition and morality, especially in its female lead.
2.O
The Queen Who Crown offers a gripping exploration of power dynamics, desires, and the shifting sands of authority within a royal marriage. The character development of the King is particularly striking, as his transformation is nothing short of a revelation.
Before ascending to the throne, the King was portrayed as a subdued, almost docile partner—more his wife's pet than her equal. The Queen, accustomed to control, treated him as a submissive weakling, and he played the part well. But as the crown settled on his head, so did a newfound freedom and ferocity, one that reveals the depth of what he had repressed.
His evolution is both exhilarating and unsettling. The King’s untamed side begins to surface, a lion unshackled from chains, roaring with the power he now wields. The narrative brilliantly peels back the layers of his character, showing the desires and ambitions he had hidden beneath a quiet exterior. It’s fascinating to see how much he had bottled up, waiting for the right moment to emerge.
Meanwhile, the Queen’s journey takes a different turn. She is left grappling with the loss of control she once took for granted. Her attempts to reclaim power are as desperate as they are calculated, painting a vivid picture of a ruler who underestimated her counterpart. Her habits of domination, once effortless, now seem futile against the King’s burgeoning autonomy.
The dynamic between the two is electrifying—a dance of dominance and defiance, love and resentment. The storytelling captures the raw emotion and tension that come with shifting power. The King’s transformation feels liberating, while the Queen’s struggle to adapt to her diminishing influence makes for compelling drama.
The Queen Who Crown is an enthralling tale of identity, freedom, and the complexities of power. The King’s journey from submissive to sovereign is as captivating as the Queen’s realization that the reins are slipping from her grasp. It’s a must-read for anyone who enjoys stories of transformation and the unpredictable nature of relationships at the highest stakes.
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
This ancient Playboys
Description says ML is Playboy of 1600she has been dating many girls
but dating was invented after 1600s so how you describe what he was doing as dating because dating did not exist in that era
Playboys in that era were killed by girls family
or he specialises in dating orphans
in those time China Virginity was as important as life for a woman and they easily give it him and then remain single whole life because on one gone marry A second hand woman according to that era
so there were no consequence of his actions at all.
Was this review helpful to you?
A Mirror to Every Self-Righteous Fool — The Tragic Comedy of Mr. Kim
After watching the first episode, I have to say the drama does an amazing job portraying its characters. The writing, pacing, and especially Ryu Seung Ryong’s performance are phenomenal. He plays Mr. Kim with such realism that you almost feel uncomfortable watching him — not because he’s badly written, but because he’s exactly the kind of person you meet in real life.But despite the drama’s description, I don’t see Mr. Kim as a hero. He isn’t a humble man who lost his way — he’s an arrogant, self-centered individual who hides his jealousy and inferiority behind the mask of “hard work” and “morality.” He convinces himself that only his way of living — serving a private company for a paycheck — is honest, while anyone earning differently must be corrupt or undeserving.
The perfect example is his attitude toward his so-called “jobless” friend who owns an eight-story building. Instead of feeling inspired or happy for him, Mr. Kim mocks and belittles him to protect his ego. His logic is pathetic — by his definition, even shareholders, business owners, or landlords are “jobless,” while he, the obedient salaryman, is the only one living “the right way.”
In truth, Mr. Kim isn’t glorifying hard work — he’s glorifying slave mentality. He worships the system that exploits him and believes serving a company faithfully is some kind of moral virtue. What’s tragic is that he feels proud of owning a flat, yet can’t see the bigger picture — owning a flat isn’t the same as owning land. His juniors, who he looks down on, are already investing in real estate and building wealth, while he’s stuck polishing his illusion of stability. He owns walls, not freedom — a symbol of how small his world really is.
It’s like he’s driving an old Hyundai while his juniors are in Rolls-Royces — a perfect metaphor for how wide the gap has grown between his delusion of success and their reality. One day, when that company he worships kicks him out just like he once kicked his own friend out, he’ll finally see the “real world” he keeps preaching about.
So far, The Dream Life of Mr. Kim isn’t a hero’s journey — it’s a painfully accurate portrait of a man destroyed by pride, jealousy, and blind loyalty to a system that never cared about him in the first place.
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Blind Devotion: When Motherly Love Turns into Selective Compassion"
In Iron Family, the portrayal of the family dynamic raises complex questions about parental love, favoritism, and autonomy, especially concerning the female lead, who is blind. While the series aims to highlight resilience and familial bonds, it also showcases troubling dynamics where the mother’s intense focus on her blind daughter feels more like pity-driven attachment than respect for her as an individual.The female lead’s blindness is used as a focal point for her interactions, and at times, it seems she leverages this condition to receive undue favors or sympathy. While her challenges are understandable, her actions often appear to cross into manipulation, using her disability to gain advantages that others might not. Rather than portraying her as a nuanced character dealing with the complexities of disability, she sometimes comes across as someone who exploits the goodwill of others, subtly reinforcing harmful stereotypes.
The mother’s character is perhaps even more problematic. The overwhelming attention she gives to her blind daughter overshadows her relationships with her other children, who are largely ignored unless they serve her primary focus. This dynamic creates an unhealthy environment, suggesting that only those who are "special" or "in need" deserve unconditional love and attention, while the "normal" siblings are left feeling unloved and undervalued. Such favoritism can have lasting psychological effects, fostering resentment and a sense of inadequacy in the other children.
Though the mother is depicted as a selfless, caring figure, her actions imply otherwise. Her love seems conditional, and rather than empowering her daughter, she inadvertently stifles her independence, treating her with a pity that undermines true respect. This lack of respect fails to recognize the blind daughter as a whole person, capable of agency and dignity beyond her disability. In reality, this kind of overprotectiveness can be incredibly harmful, perpetuating dependency and robbing the daughter of the chance to lead a fuller, autonomous life.
In short, Iron Family brings attention to the bonds and struggles of a family dealing with disability, but its execution risks reinforcing stereotypes and fostering unhealthy family dynamics. By presenting favoritism and pity-driven love as normal or even noble, the show misses an opportunity to depict a more balanced, respectful family relationship that encourages all members' growth and well-being.
Was this review helpful to you?
I just saw this same drama with Jang Na ra as lead
Same drama same storyworking woman left her lonely husband to find love and then blame him for finding love
while she never ever loved her husband but demanded complete loyalty while she herself had another man in her heart, who never left.
here we have a jerk cop who try to frame anyone he find but not FL when she is even caught he give her chance and told his minion to take care of her, is he a cop or MLs servant
how this cheap drama can only cast two police officer, one even without brain or tongue
Garbage try to copy Jang na ra drama as fast as they can, they casted 3 different people who live in three different worlds
Cop is just desperate to frame husband and take his ex girlfriend because he know she cant live alone,
she is fake independent woman who need a man, why this woman cant kick there cheating husband without finding a man to depend on,
FL manipulate crime scene buts its okey her lover is cop
she is prime suspect but lets call her something else......
No one gone Question that cop drunk with lust what he is doing because they got just two cop,
both cop were investigating case not to caught the killer but main focus was how ML can get FL safely into his bed
they need to protect FL so mL can have her
TO those who going to come and defend this garbage i hope you meet a cop that is desperate to screw your wife......
Was this review helpful to you?
YOU are welcome to defend BUT I don't give a Fish
K-Drama Imitating the West While Distorting Joseon HistoryKorean historical dramas have always struggled to find a balance between authenticity and creative storytelling. However, The Scandal of Chun Hwa takes this struggle to a whole new level, presenting an unrealistic, westernized, and outright problematic depiction of Joseon-era Korea. Instead of staying true to the rich cultural and historical aspects of the period, the drama tries too hard to mimic Western storytelling—only to fail miserably.
Joseon Era or Western Fantasy?
One of the biggest issues with this drama is how it distorts historical reality just to fit into a Westernized narrative. Korean directors seem obsessed with copying and pasting everything from Hollywood, even when it makes no sense in a Joseon-era setting. The characters talk and behave as if they belong in a 21st-century Western drama rather than a Korean historical period. The storytelling follows typical Western tropes—weak kings, overly dramatic romances, and forced "girl boss" empowerment that ultimately contradicts itself.
Women Objectified in the Name of "History"
The drama shamelessly uses its historical setting as an excuse to objectify women. A major plot point involves the protagonist, a princess, being unknowingly drawn in erotic paintings that are distributed as part of a secret business. The show tries to romanticize this as a tragic yet thrilling element, but in reality, it only glorifies the exploitation of women. Even more disturbingly, the king—her own father—is portrayed as a powerless figure who does nothing to stop this humiliation.
If the goal was to highlight the struggles of women in Joseon Korea, the drama completely misses the mark. Instead, it treats the suffering of female characters as entertainment, all while dressing it up as a "progressive" story. This reflects a deeper issue in Korean dramas—where so-called "female empowerment" is often nothing more than a woman being used, discarded, and then "saved" by a rich or powerful man.
Korean Society’s View on Women—Then and Now
The drama unintentionally exposes how little has changed in Korean society regarding the treatment of women. Instead of addressing these issues in a meaningful way, it reinforces them under the guise of storytelling. Women in this drama (and many others) are still seen as objects—whether for power, revenge, or entertainment. Despite Korea’s economic rise (thanks largely to the influence of the U.S.), societal views on gender remain deeply problematic.
If this is what Korean entertainment considers "empowerment," then it's no wonder that their dramas continue to struggle with meaningful representation. True empowerment isn’t about selling a woman’s body or suffering for male entertainment—it’s about giving female characters real agency, respect, and strength beyond just being used as plot devices.
Final Verdict
Instead of being a fresh take on historical drama, The Scandal of Chun Hwa is just another attempt to copy Western storytelling while failing to respect its own cultural and historical roots. Worse, it reinforces outdated ideas about women under the illusion of empowerment. Until Korean entertainment stops treating women as objects—whether in Joseon Korea or modern-day Seoul—it will continue to be stuck in this shallow and contradictory cycle.
★☆☆☆☆ (1/5) – Disappointing, unrealistic, and problematic
Was this review helpful to you?
Spineless prideless Female fight over a averaging looking unemployed Korean
Spineless prideless Female fight over a averaging looking unemployed Korean because he is 2inches down there then Normal Korean standard size of 1inchFemale lead got cheated left, but at end all will be forgiven and she would accept that cheater and think she win by getting a used and thrown shit man
he lost his memory and all that Nonsense shit
he Lost his marbles way before losing his memories
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Was this review helpful to you?
This review may contain spoilers
Should Be Called Fight Club, Not Study Group!
Study Group is an adrenaline-packed drama that grabs you from the start! Despite its title, there’s hardly any studying involved—it’s all about the fights, and honestly, they’re incredible. The action scenes are thrilling and choreographed to perfection, delivering non-stop excitement that rivals top-tier action movies.Hwang Min Hyun, playing the male lead (ML), delivers a strong performance. With his glasses and unassuming appearance, he initially gives off Peter Parker vibes—except instead of a spider bite, he’s somehow a Roman Reigns-level fighter! His punches send people flying like balloons, making you wonder if they went a little overboard with the wirework. Still, if you embrace the over-the-top action, it’s part of the show’s charm.
One of the most surprising aspects is the undeniable chemistry between the ML and the female teacher. Their connection feels way stronger than a typical teacher-student bond, but it adds an intriguing emotional layer to the storyline.
If you’re looking for jaw-dropping fights, engaging character dynamics, and a plot that keeps you hooked, Study Group is a must-watch. Just be prepared—it feels more like Fight Club than a study session, and that’s exactly what makes it so fun!
Was this review helpful to you?
