Sigh

In the past, women were private property, hidden from the ravenous eyes of the world. Today, they are public property, put on display for the masses to feast their eyes on. Society has traded the chains of the past for the shackles of today, pressuring women to strip bare their dignity for the delight of others

There's no good reason to include "sex." The true horror of "violence" against women isn't in the shock of blood and nudity, but in the psychological and social effects it wreaks on its survivors. That's what media should show

It's more concerning that you're shaming the women who might not be into the plot. Not everyone wants to see "sex" toys flying around on screen

You're telling others what to do and how to react to NSFW content (to rate it high or to ignore it), don't be surprised that others do the same to you about your preferences

People are artificially inflating the rating, it's 8.0 now

My comments aren't "always related to sex." You haven't seen my comments on other subjects, we don't frequent the same areas of discussion

Rather than indulging in carnal desires, it's more beneficial for women and men to focus their energies on pursuits that are intellectually stimulating and meaningful, such as discussing philosophy

"Queen Woo" not being as extreme as some Korean movies doesn't absolve it of its transgressions against decency and respect

Being born was the start of all my problems. I wish I could go back in time to convince my "parents" to become hermits in the mountains. They'd be too busy communing with nature to meet up or have kids

It takes maturity to abstain from something that’s everywhere you look. I give virgin adults a round of applause for their self-control

The mechanics of baby-making are well-known. Knowing the details of how babies are made and brought into the world only heightens my discomfort and distaste for the "straight" lifestyle

Women aren't a monolith, they have varying beliefs on what constitutes "empowerment." They might believe that the hypersexualization of women or the obsession with "sex" is disempowering for women

"Sex" isn't a measure of maturity and a middle-aged, virgin woman isn't less of an adult. Resisting the societal pressure to engage in "sexual" activity is true adulthood, the kind that comes from knowing oneself and staying true to one's values

Hating "sex" is a preference

We don't need a front-row seat to the baby-making process to know it happens. People should keep those "straight" fetishes tucked away behind closed doors

Hating "sex" is a preference

We don't need a front-row seat to the baby-making process to know it happens. Keep those "straight" fetishes tucked away behind closed doors

"Sex" isn't a need, it's a want. And wants can be unhealthy, especially when they pressure someone else to satisfy them

I'm living proof that one can survive without "sex." If other people's libidos are driving them crazy, there's always medication to tame that beast

It's not misogynistic. If it were a female actor with the same level of talent, I'd be singing her praises as loudly

The backflips and cartwheels people do to excuse homophobia could give a Cirque du Soleil performer a run for their money. They're ignoring censorship and that's their choice, but we choose to exercise our right to call it out and express our outrage in the comments. That shouldn't be a problem

Comments sections aren't a positivity echo chamber where only praise is allowed. They're a place for all voices, happy or unhappy

A little bit of gay romance on TV can turn the world upside down, I'm saying this as a gay woman

Why did the producers remove something small? They figured it would drop a glitter bomb on homophobes and change something. They didn't want to risk it and be that change

"And it's not like two women could really be out as a couple in the 50s"

Gay people and couples existed in the 50s. Society pretended they didn't exist because they didn't fit into societal norms

History is full of hidden stories, it's up to us to explore them. If we can cook up stories about wizards, mermaids and time-traveling toasters, we can include gay romance in a historical setting

We're not changing the course of history or rewriting the Declaration of Independence in drag, we're uncovering a treasure trove of hidden emotions, socially forbidden desires and whispered confessions. We're acknowledging a part of history that's erased and celebrating the courage of those who dared to love their same sex despite the odds

"... this is not the right drama for GL"

Every drama is the right drama for some GL

"I would like it if it had two women in love"

You claim to want a GL romance, then immediately dismiss the possibility. Make up your mind, lady!

The loss of the girl-girl romance is a real shame

I do agree with your point on the gender-swap dress-up. Women playing male characters onstage doesn't signal some personal identity struggle. We can debate the believability of the performance (men playing male roles or women playing female roles is a more authentic, believable performance, as the performer can draw on their own experiences and perspectives to bring depth to the character), but we can't assume they're trans and doubting their womanhood

We're sparking conversations and building awareness among viewers. Change in the entertainment industry begins with reshaping audience attitudes and habits. For example, through conscious withdrawal of viewership or financial support, we viewers can communicate that the removal of gay romances is an objectionable practice

Every complaint we make is a seed. You never know when they'll sprout into something bigger

If nothing else, we're providing free entertainment for those reading the comments. You're welcome