Angelica Gea

I liked it very much: very believable characters, well built and played. I loved the ending too, which pretty much resamble a bit the ending of a brilliant norwegian movie "The Worst Person in the World" (2021) and tons of italian films.
I found Kil Hae Yeon's acting simply stunning. what a mervellous actress!

Mate, I hear u. I guess it is the latter, sadly -_-

These screenwriters are on drugs, ain't got any other explanations... I have compassion for the entire cast, it has been a while since I've seen such pathetic characters so badly built, in a plot that is a total mess and leaks like a bloody sieve.
I mean, not even Meryl Streep could play well with such those lines...

Daaa XD

LMAO!

I would love it to be, but it is not the fruit of my tree, obviosly :))

Mate, in general, i absolutely agree with everything u said, totally. My issue and disappointment on this specific article, though, is the cut chosen. To me it doesn't sound "very much against the cancel-culture" at all. To me it is too impartial, giving the seriousness of the situation, far too neutral by suggesting "how do you think an artist should be judged?", too meanly catching in the very title, while, imho, it should be an exposè on the entertaining industry, a denouncing article about sponsors' miscondact and certainly not relate "exposè" to "private affair" for getting clicks.
Cos here the real scandal is the industry's misbehavior, surely not a private affair.
I'm not asking for combact reporters, just to have bigger balls than these to show direct support against an injustice suffered by artists (at any levels, I sniff screenwriters, maybe, are the most economically blackmailed by the television industry ) who are the core and the reason your own website exists.
So it's a matter of HOW u write news more than WHAT, for me. That's it.

Ikr

so.in ep 1 we basically see Lady Galadriel vs Sauron, right? :P

oh, and your article perfectly connects to the long discussion we had in the comments section about The Interest Of Love (2022 K), where we watched the exact opposite: twisted an unhealthy relationships between friends and lovers. But it was a good thing in this case cos the show forced you the reflect in a mature way about human flaws, people's limits and imperfections.

Figure that i haven't even seen this series I will though LOL, but that's not what matters i think. What is valuable is your approach, especially to something that it is not your forte, in the matter of analysis and comparison in human behavior. I liked the method u used : analytical and extensive, very well explained , but visually also very schematic and concise in the summaries. I adored the contents about what we should take as a Healthy relationship at any levels. Too many times i have found dramas in general counter-productive on the educational side towards young girls and more, as if they carried the message that u need to suffer and be mistreated if you wanna find love in life. Almost like many dramas suggested that you need to be in distress, you need a man to save you and that it is right to endure what's wrong too. Romanticism to me is something else and it is summerized in what you have written. As well as being feminists is basically believing and searching for healthy relationships in life, imho. The attention you gave to the mutual independence in a pair is what sometimes many girls and women forget and as it said in The Handmaid's Tale: "Raise your daughter to be a feminist or she''ll spend all her time waiting to be rescued by men". :)

Thank you, I have to give you a round of applause, BRAVA! I'd really like any teenagers, whatever the genre, could read a study like this.

Sorry in advance, I will show no mercy on this... don't shoot me, professional habit on this subject . First two BS on dogs I'll find and the rate 2 is sold LOL

I guess they needed to give birth to countless puppies, surely one litter wasn't enough :)

LMAO

done ! thank you buddy :)

thank you, mate, i did as you suggested ;)

Socrates' Triple Filter Test:

One day in ancient Greece, an acquaintance met with the great philosopher Socrates and said, “Do you know what I just heard about your friend?"

“Hold on a minute,” Socrates replied. “Before telling me anything, let’s put it through the triple filter test.”

“Triple filter?” the man asked.

“That’s right,” Socrates continued. “The first filter is truth. Are you absolutely sure that what you are about to tell me is true?"

The man replied, “Well, no… I just heard about it and—”

Socrates interrupted, “Alright, so you don’t even know if it’s true. Now let’s try the second filter, the filter of goodness. Is what you are about to tell me about my friend something that’s good?”

The man replied, “No, on the contrary...”

Socrates interrupted again, “So you want to tell me something bad about him, but you’re not certain it’s true. Okay let’s try the final filter, the filter of usefulness. Is what you want to tell me about my friend going to be useful for me?”

The man replied, “Not really—”.

Socrates concluded, “Well, if what you want to say is not true, not good, nor useful, then why say it at all?”

i dunno, but it doesn't seem so

Dear MDL's friendly Staff, i beg your pardon if I dare to ask you a direct bold question, but i must:
are you planning to become a trash site to the bone?
Thank you, anyway, for your hard work, I'll wait for your answer through the choices of articles you'll post in the future among your news.
Strongly hoping to preserve the esteem I hold, I just wanna believe this one above is merely a bad debacle everyone in their life could have once in a while...