They are too lazy to go check the definition in the Law and they prefer to argument based on their own understanding…
Why you say he felt uncomfortable with her kiss. How do you know? It is your own assessment. If he was, he would not have given his phone number to her after she kissed him. This tells that he was ok with it and he even would not mind to hear from her again. .
You are just projecting your own judgement on the characters of the drama. It is like you have decided that it was sexual harassment so it must be. You should read the characters based on what they actually say and do instead of speculating. If someone called the cops on her for sexual harassment and they learn he gave her his phone number afterwards, they will just laugh and fine all of them for wasting the time of the police.
They are too lazy to go check the definition in the Law and they prefer to argument based on their own understanding…
Maybe you should just enjoy the drama as it is or drop it but stop making judgement of intentions. If it was sexual harassment, Dae Hyun would have called the cops on her. He did not because he did not felt attacked or intimidated. It did not cause him distress. He did not feel offended or degraded in his dignity. He did not go into depression ... Thats what the law says. Now you can keep thinking unexpected means sexual harassment. But it does not. Anyway you are entitled to your own understanding and opinion.
I have a feeling that it's the same people who are enraged if a foreigner wears Kimono or Lederhosen, even if…
If you consider that this drama suggest all jamaicans are perverted and dirty you can just go sue the producers to court. Or maybe the guy is just perverted and dirty no matter what clothes or haistyle he wears.
When i dislike a drama I drop it and don't comment any further on it. It's very sad that the same* people feel…
They are too lazy to go check the definition in the Law and they prefer to argument based on their own understanding of the situation. I agree with you, the ones who find this drama offensive, sexist, racist, whatever... they can just stop watching and go to sue the producers and have them apologize. It would be a lot more effective than arguing here.
I don't see where in this drama there is sexual harassment or physical abuse or cheating so far.
Yes but a definition in a dictionnary is not the Law which varies from a country to another. I believe that in South Korea, they do like in the dictionnary and they also consider the consequences on the victim first and not the intention of the perpetrator. In my country, the Law defines that the intention must be proven but says it is proven when the perpretator is aware of is action. He does not need to know the extent of the consequences on the victim.
Don't waste time trying to reason hysterical SJW. She was 19 at the moment of the kiss. They were both adults…
"Sexual harrassment is the act of imposing to someone, in a repeated manner, words or behaviors with a sexual connotation which undermine his/her dignity because of their degrading, humiliating nature or create for this person a situation of intimidation, hostility or offense".
This is the Law in my country. So for me, there is no sexual harassment in what Saet Buyl did. In South Korea they also focus on the fact that the person harassed must feel as a victim because of the actions of the other party. Dae Hyun never felt or considered this kiss as degrading, humiliating, hostile or disgusting.
I don't see where in this drama there is sexual harassment or physical abuse or cheating so far.
Lucky my country did not adopt these standards or else we would have as many trials as they have in their country. In my country the Law says:
"Sexual harrassment is the act of imposing to someone, in a repeated manner, words or behaviors with a sexual connotation which undermine his/her dignity because of their degrading, humiliating nature or create for this person a situation of intimidation, hostility or offense".
So at least for my country, there is no sexual harassment there.
I don't see where in this drama there is sexual harassment or physical abuse or cheating so far.
I guess coworkers need to really pay attention to these definitions from the US Equal Employement Opportunity Commission. I am glad I don't work in the USA.
As for me, I consider there is no harassment when there is no hostile intention. Or else you could sue your grandfather to court for the time he kissed you when you were a kid.
I don't see where in this drama there is sexual harassment or physical abuse or cheating so far.
Unexpected kiss or saving your phone number touching somebody or rubbing your head against somebody, this is not harassment. I kindly remind you to go check what harassment means.
Question, I have been posting a myriad of comments on how I do not think dreadlocks are racist. However, my view…
Dreadlocks have been used by multiple people in multiple places South America, Mexico, Africa, Iran.... since thousands of year. These dreadlocks became a style and popular since 1950 because jamaicans and rastafarians made it popular. People like Bob Marley for example. So it was a cultural appropriation from them but at that time, there was not social medias and no SWJ to comme lecture you and call you a thief for stealing this style from minorities or people who suffered discimination.
That's just nonsense. If this was true, wearing kimono, eating pasta or noodle, doing yoga or karate, eating taco bells, drinking beer... everything would be cultural appropriation because all cultures are born from learning and adopting things which were not yours previously. Throughout time, the culture which identifies every people changed, evolved, cultural elements moved from a continent to another. We as humans all learn from each other to form and renew the expression of our identity that anyone can recognize and adopt.
The SJW who denounce this are contradicting themselves because they want you to think it is a spoiliation to do this as we are all humans and should respect each other's culture but in truth, it is because we are all humans that we can do it.
I have a feeling that it's the same people who are enraged if a foreigner wears Kimono or Lederhosen, even if…
I remember the story of that US western girl Keziah Daum of Salt Lake City who went to her prom wearing a chinese traditional gown and she got bashed on social medias because of cultureal appropriation and disrespectful attitude. You can see there how people can become hysterical and crazy just because of a simple thing which did not meant to offend anyone. She just liked it but some SJW on Social Medias they think they are born to defend the cause of minorities and anything you do or use from them, you are stealing them of their identity. Stupid people.
You are just projecting your own judgement on the characters of the drama. It is like you have decided that it was sexual harassment so it must be. You should read the characters based on what they actually say and do instead of speculating. If someone called the cops on her for sexual harassment and they learn he gave her his phone number afterwards, they will just laugh and fine all of them for wasting the time of the police.
This is the Law in my country. So for me, there is no sexual harassment in what Saet Buyl did. In South Korea they also focus on the fact that the person harassed must feel as a victim because of the actions of the other party. Dae Hyun never felt or considered this kiss as degrading, humiliating, hostile or disgusting.
"Sexual harrassment is the act of imposing to someone, in a repeated manner, words or behaviors with a sexual connotation which undermine his/her dignity because of their degrading, humiliating nature or create for this person a situation of intimidation, hostility or offense".
So at least for my country, there is no sexual harassment there.
As for me, I consider there is no harassment when there is no hostile intention. Or else you could sue your grandfather to court for the time he kissed you when you were a kid.
That's just nonsense. If this was true, wearing kimono, eating pasta or noodle, doing yoga or karate, eating taco bells, drinking beer... everything would be cultural appropriation because all cultures are born from learning and adopting things which were not yours previously. Throughout time, the culture which identifies every people changed, evolved, cultural elements moved from a continent to another. We as humans all learn from each other to form and renew the expression of our identity that anyone can recognize and adopt.
The SJW who denounce this are contradicting themselves because they want you to think it is a spoiliation to do this as we are all humans and should respect each other's culture but in truth, it is because we are all humans that we can do it.