Also Huajin's perspective on Pei Yi killing her enemy and not being able to sleep at night is such a bullsh-t. She killed at least 50 people on screen but killing her enemy will stop her sleeping at night... ahahah. what a nonsense. Huajin should get his head out of his a-s. I really hate when leads stop killing their enemies for the sake of not killing people when in reality they freaking killed dozens of people on their way. Make it make sense.
That f-ker emperor should be shamed and killed. I wish she just rebelled and freaking take over the country. That arrogant b-tch emperor deserves nothing. Ugh, I hate him so much.
I said, l human beings have no moral or logical highground against them. It's not that humans have no morals, for example would you able to argue that humans have moral highground to tigers, or other predators? We have inherintly different way of lives but that doesn't grant us the justification to condemn their actions since they're not the same species.
I think I'm officially too old for this. It feels like old school shoujo manga and I'm no longer vibing with clueless heiress type female leads and male leads that are drowning in too much ongoing trauma.
what, is it normal? cause most people I know have learned cooking at least in their high school years, only privileged people wouldn't know how to cook. And, in this case, I guess she is.
Reading your comment made me laugh because I first drank coffee at 17 or 18 and people still said I was “too…
I come from a tea/coffee drinking culture and I've been drinking both of them as long as I can remeber. Another example is my niece, she used to drink coffee from our cups when she was 3 years old cause she liked the taste. So this notion of being too young to drink tea/coffee is super weird to me.
I dunno about you but I definitely wouldn’t agree to being sedated then having my blood drawn without my knowledge…
That is true from our point of view but when you think how other animals and other living beings view humans... that is another story. Blaming or demeaning them because they choose to look like humans to survive in a human world is kind of hypocrisy. Humans in general do much much worse to their own kind let alone other living beings. So, human characters in this drama kept repeating how earth fiend's mimicry of humans is fake and how they can never be as good as humans, that part felt too forced. Cause, you know, like I said, humans aren't all that good afterall. This superiority complex towards fiends was simply ridicilous.
A hot take on earth fiends, they really don't deserve all of that animosity. I mean, they're just trying to survive in their new enviorment. They're predators just like humans and other animals, and let's be real human beings have no moral or logical highground against them.
It's not at all like WoH. This is a bond thats shared by brother, family. A family they chose and stuck by. I…
Couple days ago I made a post how bromance was turning into a BL fetish fantasy for viewers and how that made me uncomfortable, guess what, nobody took that well :) I wish they kept BL as they are and stop mixing into all friendships/familial relationships. If I want BL content I'll watch BL content. Also, they do that even male leads have significant others in the drama and if it that much gay, than it is cheating.
6ht episode annoyed the hell out of me. Why should she cover herself when those perverts are the ones committing a crime? And, that music too. Ugh, gross. He should've dealt with the offenders instead of stopping a freaking doctor giving first aid.
If she started killing willy nilly , wouldn't she be the villain in that case?
"But family of the killers suffer when you kill their family member, so you hurt them by killing so you should now be killed, am i right? You did vile thing that other people suffered from." I wasn't gonna reply but dang, suffering from 2nd hand emotional distress ain't the same as loosing your life. Your scale is crooked and I don't think you actually read a single word I've written properly.
"Very famous saying goes ''It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer'', you just can't justify killing one innocent person to punish real criminals." I never said punishing innocent people, I also mentioned how capital punishment should be regulated at most strict level.
When it comes to the drama, Situ Ling's crimes were out in the open. For our modern world, people get punishment according to crimes that justice system that can provide an evidence for. Like I said before death penalty for killing others should be under strict supervision to ensure no innocent people are affected but can you honestly say that a serial killer with all dna evidences, videos out there which they kill their victims in cold blood, can be innocent of those crimes? I don't lack empathy, I advocate fairness. All of my examples are for extreme situations, including extreme individuals, just like Situ Ling in this context. I obviously didn't say kill those who kill other as an accident, without an intent nor in self defense. But you keep shoving those thoughts into my comments when obviously they do not conform with what I actually wrote.
p.s. EMPATHY: the ability to understand and share the feelings of another. So for this instance if someone I loved became a vile murderer I'd want them to be punished for their crimes accordingly whilst mourning for them. You can do both. For example Nethanyu and Hitler must have people who loved them, right?
If she started killing willy nilly , wouldn't she be the villain in that case?
"Its foreign as most first world countries don't do capital punishment and most countries who do abuse it towards their current regimes needs." US and China are in supreme position when it comes to being first world countries yet they do actively use it as a punishment. So, it is actually a big chunk of the world that does that. And as for abusing the system, it happens from a to z and not just for capital punishment. Should it be regulated in utmost strict level, yes, should we get rid of it completely, no. And, I do not live in place where capital punishment is a thing.
"So why would you care that killers family is sad? Do you not have empathy? " Why would you account for feelings for a vile crime that brought so much pain and loss? Those who lacks empathy and respect for human life should be treated the same way, you can't reform everyone. Most of those serial killers(which I kept mentioning throughout all of my comments as it fits into this context) have no compassion nor any regard for human life, keeping them alive for that another person might mourn their loss is absurd. "They aren't the people who did the crime and you punish them either way?" umm, I didn't say kill the family of the killer, I don't understand your thought process at this part.
"You analogy is wrong with this stealing. You are supposed to advocate loss of hand with stealing if you want the good old days back. " I never mentioned old days of justice system. All of my comment were in context of this fantasy world as well as our modern world. So, no cutting a hand for stealing is not my analogy. My analogy was our modern laws where one pays what s/he steals and serves jail time if it fits the bill.
I quote myself " Unless it is self defense/accident it always should be a life for a life." as an answer to your question "So if you accidentally drive over someone, do you deserve to die? ".
Anyways, like I said, actions should have consequences. Your world view is too naive and I don't think I can ever see eye to eye with those who protect actual vile murderers' lives. I don't think I'll be replying anymore, so bye.
If she started killing willy nilly , wouldn't she be the villain in that case?
So, you mean a serial killer should be pardoned, kept at prison for life while s/he eats and sleeps with the tax payers money? Who cares if that serial killer's family is sad, this isn't about emotions but paying what is due. Unless it is self defense/accident it always should be a life for a life. That is my bottom line. Someone has to execute that verdict, doing so isn't same as killing with intention. I don't understand why this logic is so foreign to you, it is actually the very system we live in our modern society. Though death sentences aren't given lightly yet also not always given enough. People govern each other, if a crime goes unpunished then where do you draw the line? If you steal money, you pay it back and detained regarding the context, so if you steal a life, why shouldn't you pay it with yours to compensate it?
If she started killing willy nilly , wouldn't she be the villain in that case?
It does fit the context, she shot her arrow at him after he attacked them, it was a fatal blow and was done in self defense. "I live in a world which has developed past emotion deciding what do with criminals and have same justice for everyone." My view is pretty rational, a life for a life, where is the emotion in that. Also, we do have death sentences for well deserved crimes as well as not that deserving ones. Political crimes and money related crimes are usually sentenced higher, yet it only applies to people with no power. Those in power kills, steals, and condemns millions with no consequences.
Actions have consequences, if you kill an innocent person, you should forfeit your life as well. But, killing a killer, why would it be a crime? It is not simply killing a living being but delivering their sentence for the sake of the victim. Think about a serial killer, someone like that would get a death sentence under ideal conditions and some has to execute that. In this context, warriors of the two realms do carry enough discernment to carry such an act.
Situ well written? nice jokeHe is a loser .. an annoying crybaby
I understood his character setting but the writers didn't give us enough to feel anything for him, or maybe his acting fell short. Idk, there was something missing. We knew he didn't love her, the whole world knew he didn't love her, his obsession was his undoing yet I'm not convinced by him. Or maybe that was the intention, we were supposed to feel nothing for this character. Like I said, I wasn't even mad at his evil saga, I would've welcomed it if he actually succeeded. Killing his father might have been a good touch.
If she started killing willy nilly , wouldn't she be the villain in that case?
Oh wow, okay, self defense is a thing you know. Also, if someone kills other people indiscriminately should they be just forgiven? It is only fair to give a life for a life and for the countless people he has killed, he deserves to die over that many times. Why wouldn't it be justified? Just because he didn't stand at a trial in a crooked justice system like in our modern world? I don't know what kind of world you live in but that is privilege talking. A person is born as a human being but not all die as such. A human can become less than all living beings just by its actions, and if it comes to that, why killing it wouldn't be justified.
Situ well written? nice jokeHe is a loser .. an annoying crybaby
I didn't even hate him, felt pity or anything. Frankly till the last 8 episodes or so I was fine how he kept helping Ming Yi. But, his weird obsession was so over the top that even Ming Yi was like what the heck, I just told you couple encouragements yet you keep shoving your obsession down on my throat. She didn't save him from a life or death situation yet still got struck with his obsession. Ming Yi couldn't understand why, Fu Yue kept asking why and us the viewers were also baffled. It was bad writing because his love was too shallow, hence it didn't do anything for the viewers.
If she started killing willy nilly , wouldn't she be the villain in that case?
He was already dying, she saved him. And, he wasn't an innocent by passer, he killed innocent people, used nether beasts power to empower himself and was planning to active the array to destroy the 6 realms. Killing him would be beyond justified yet she went as far as saving him. Makes no sense, all that plan to not endanger the 6 realms could've been achieved by killing him 2 episodes earlier.
I really hate when leads stop killing their enemies for the sake of not killing people when in reality they freaking killed dozens of people on their way. Make it make sense.
We have inherintly different way of lives but that doesn't grant us the justification to condemn their actions since they're not the same species.
Humans in general do much much worse to their own kind let alone other living beings.
So, human characters in this drama kept repeating how earth fiend's mimicry of humans is fake and how they can never be as good as humans, that part felt too forced. Cause, you know, like I said, humans aren't all that good afterall. This superiority complex towards fiends was simply ridicilous.
I wish they kept BL as they are and stop mixing into all friendships/familial relationships. If I want BL content I'll watch BL content. Also, they do that even male leads have significant others in the drama and if it that much gay, than it is cheating.
I wasn't gonna reply but dang, suffering from 2nd hand emotional distress ain't the same as loosing your life. Your scale is crooked and I don't think you actually read a single word I've written properly.
"Very famous saying goes ''It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer'', you just can't justify killing one innocent person to punish real criminals."
I never said punishing innocent people, I also mentioned how capital punishment should be regulated at most strict level.
When it comes to the drama, Situ Ling's crimes were out in the open. For our modern world, people get punishment according to crimes that justice system that can provide an evidence for.
Like I said before death penalty for killing others should be under strict supervision to ensure no innocent people are affected but can you honestly say that a serial killer with all dna evidences, videos out there which they kill their victims in cold blood, can be innocent of those crimes?
I don't lack empathy, I advocate fairness. All of my examples are for extreme situations, including extreme individuals, just like Situ Ling in this context.
I obviously didn't say kill those who kill other as an accident, without an intent nor in self defense. But you keep shoving those thoughts into my comments when obviously they do not conform with what I actually wrote.
p.s. EMPATHY: the ability to understand and share the feelings of another. So for this instance if someone I loved became a vile murderer I'd want them to be punished for their crimes accordingly whilst mourning for them. You can do both. For example Nethanyu and Hitler must have people who loved them, right?
p.s.s Anyways, I'm done for real this time.
US and China are in supreme position when it comes to being first world countries yet they do actively use it as a punishment. So, it is actually a big chunk of the world that does that. And as for abusing the system, it happens from a to z and not just for capital punishment. Should it be regulated in utmost strict level, yes, should we get rid of it completely, no.
And, I do not live in place where capital punishment is a thing.
"So why would you care that killers family is sad? Do you not have empathy? "
Why would you account for feelings for a vile crime that brought so much pain and loss? Those who lacks empathy and respect for human life should be treated the same way, you can't reform everyone. Most of those serial killers(which I kept mentioning throughout all of my comments as it fits into this context) have no compassion nor any regard for human life, keeping them alive for that another person might mourn their loss is absurd.
"They aren't the people who did the crime and you punish them either way?" umm, I didn't say kill the family of the killer, I don't understand your thought process at this part.
"You analogy is wrong with this stealing. You are supposed to advocate loss of hand with stealing if you want the good old days back. "
I never mentioned old days of justice system. All of my comment were in context of this fantasy world as well as our modern world. So, no cutting a hand for stealing is not my analogy. My analogy was our modern laws where one pays what s/he steals and serves jail time if it fits the bill.
I quote myself " Unless it is self defense/accident it always should be a life for a life." as an answer to your question "So if you accidentally drive over someone, do you deserve to die? ".
Anyways, like I said, actions should have consequences. Your world view is too naive and I don't think I can ever see eye to eye with those who protect actual vile murderers' lives.
I don't think I'll be replying anymore, so bye.
Who cares if that serial killer's family is sad, this isn't about emotions but paying what is due. Unless it is self defense/accident it always should be a life for a life. That is my bottom line. Someone has to execute that verdict, doing so isn't same as killing with intention.
I don't understand why this logic is so foreign to you, it is actually the very system we live in our modern society. Though death sentences aren't given lightly yet also not always given enough. People govern each other, if a crime goes unpunished then where do you draw the line?
If you steal money, you pay it back and detained regarding the context, so if you steal a life, why shouldn't you pay it with yours to compensate it?
"I live in a world which has developed past emotion deciding what do with criminals and have same justice for everyone."
My view is pretty rational, a life for a life, where is the emotion in that. Also, we do have death sentences for well deserved crimes as well as not that deserving ones. Political crimes and money related crimes are usually sentenced higher, yet it only applies to people with no power. Those in power kills, steals, and condemns millions with no consequences.
Actions have consequences, if you kill an innocent person, you should forfeit your life as well. But, killing a killer, why would it be a crime? It is not simply killing a living being but delivering their sentence for the sake of the victim.
Think about a serial killer, someone like that would get a death sentence under ideal conditions and some has to execute that. In this context, warriors of the two realms do carry enough discernment to carry such an act.
Like I said, I wasn't even mad at his evil saga, I would've welcomed it if he actually succeeded. Killing his father might have been a good touch.
I don't know what kind of world you live in but that is privilege talking. A person is born as a human being but not all die as such. A human can become less than all living beings just by its actions, and if it comes to that, why killing it wouldn't be justified.
She didn't save him from a life or death situation yet still got struck with his obsession. Ming Yi couldn't understand why, Fu Yue kept asking why and us the viewers were also baffled.
It was bad writing because his love was too shallow, hence it didn't do anything for the viewers.
Killing him would be beyond justified yet she went as far as saving him. Makes no sense, all that plan to not endanger the 6 realms could've been achieved by killing him 2 episodes earlier.