"Lighter & Princess was very popular. Should those who have watched it change their scoring to 1 just because Arthur Chen slept with a woman at a hotel? Should those that are planning to watch it, not watch it at all because of it?"
What even is this question? Are you kidding me? Are we 12 or what?
Yes, I was planning to watch it and I definitely am still watching it, unless his behaviour is of like Ezra Miller's level of craziness. If it does not harm anybody & is consensual, then I don't care, it's his life and we're all people who make mistakes. If this even can be called a mistake. Also, if the lady's married, she is the one responsible for hurting her husband.
The main problem is the drama having an identity crisis, which is typical of law-themed kdramas that HAS to have…
This change of main theme from FL's coping with her job change to political struggle truly came a bit out of place. And thanks to that I felt like the FL wasn't a part of the main theme (which in the end turned out to be the political one) until like ep 10. Like everyone focused on the murders by that point, while she was still struggling with her cases.
Oh, it's good. The ending on the other hand had the audience split: there are ones who think it's a happy ending,…
Well, in the end the chef who was inside the Queen's body comes back to the future and Queen's original soul comes inside her body once again. Soo: - The chef is separated from his friends, his beloved one, and his kid who was still in the womb, with basically no goodbye, - The king is left there thinking his beloved is still the same person, even though Queen's behaviour is totally different from the chef's
Some people are happy with the ending, as they believe that the original queen was the one pulling the strings the entire time (and the one who fell in love with the king). They feel that the chef didn't love the king, it was all the queen. I, and many others however feel that the queen was barely shown in the series, and the chef was the main character all along (only to some extent influenced by female hormones and queen's memories I guess) and was the one inlove with the king. But in the end the queen got everything she didn't deserve and fight for: friends, love, kid.
I'm actually curious how they will handle a couple that's already together and in this many episodes at that. If they break up and get together at the end of the season, it'll be too much for me XD overall, I think it will be an ok filler drama, nothing too special, just something to chill to
I would take everything with Shin Hye Sun at this point, so it only adds to the excitement when she's actually getting paired with such good actors (although seeing it being written by Go Back Couple's screenwriter has me a bit worried...)
Haha, nope i haven't yet. Since i only started to watch kdrama about a year ago, i have soooo much to catch up…
Also, kudos to you for watching so many ongoing dramas, I have been disappointed one too many tine about an ending and still can't trust a drama enough to watch it ongoing haha
Actually I think in certain regions it's nothing weird. In my family it was quite ok until I grew up, but I guess times changed now. It didn't gross me out, esp that her father is sick.
As per other articles 'According to a press release, Call It Love will premiere exclusively on the streaming service beginning February 22', so I guess it will air weekly, just as any other Disney+ shows (Marvel, Star Wars etc)
I know that the main couple broke up because of ML's infidelity, but I am just such a sucker for dramas where the main leads are exes. This kind of chemistry is just not something you see with the normal couples and these dramas are too rare (I am such a sucker for Our Beloved Summer...). So I might pick it up, just wandering whether to wait and binge or just watch it airing!
Even if she is, so what? Is it a reason to bash her everywhere and drag her name in front of public, which will…
You do know that you can go to police with something like this when you have proof and they contact the person in question? Unless you don't, then you can just write on forums and try to convince people while delivering no proof. You don't see any reason for it not to be true? Haven't you seen any recent bullying drama in SK which actually turned out very much false? It takes 1 second to ruin somebodys reputation in SK and no defamation suits will make that go away. Even for people with large audiences. But yeah, if you're now insulting me personally, I guess that's the finish line for me. Have fun in your black and white world when you'd like somebody who stole 10 dollars to be executed or have their life ruined in some other way.
Even if she is, so what? Is it a reason to bash her everywhere and drag her name in front of public, which will…
What facts? Do you have ang proof? How the hell do you know if she is a bitch? Why are you calling a 17 year old's behaviour bitchy anyway? How do you know they had good intentions? Proof of that surely isn't in the article. I'm not assuming whether she stole the money or not. I am clearly stating that it's fine to get your money back by legal means. But going to public online forums to shame a 17 year old girl when you're older than her? Damn, that's just predatory behaviour.
And of course the amount matters. But yeah, let's go back to times of hammurabi laws. Cause why not, if somebody's doing it why can't we! Life is just all black and white, right?
What even is this question? Are you kidding me? Are we 12 or what?
Yes, I was planning to watch it and I definitely am still watching it, unless his behaviour is of like Ezra Miller's level of craziness. If it does not harm anybody & is consensual, then I don't care, it's his life and we're all people who make mistakes. If this even can be called a mistake. Also, if the lady's married, she is the one responsible for hurting her husband.
- The chef is separated from his friends, his beloved one, and his kid who was still in the womb, with basically no goodbye,
- The king is left there thinking his beloved is still the same person, even though Queen's behaviour is totally different from the chef's
Some people are happy with the ending, as they believe that the original queen was the one pulling the strings the entire time (and the one who fell in love with the king). They feel that the chef didn't love the king, it was all the queen. I, and many others however feel that the queen was barely shown in the series, and the chef was the main character all along (only to some extent influenced by female hormones and queen's memories I guess) and was the one inlove with the king. But in the end the queen got everything she didn't deserve and fight for: friends, love, kid.
And of course the amount matters. But yeah, let's go back to times of hammurabi laws. Cause why not, if somebody's doing it why can't we! Life is just all black and white, right?