bayanoh

I'm sorry, but this sounds like an AI generated script. Not sure if it's just the translation, but it does sound like something a human wouldn't say.

I love when people pretend to be more "informed", instead of giving any kind of information (other than their opinions). It tells me that they either don't have any information to give, or haven't lived long enough to learn how to process information (i.e they just go with the first conclusion they come up with and stick with it). Either way, it's such conversation blocker, and it gives me a reason to stop the back and forth that I dislike. So, thank you too.

Again.. I WAS around when they were getting a divorce. I've been following this industry for more than two decades, and as you said, it was "unavoidable". The difference between me and you is that even though I hate her acting and I'm genuinely shocked that she got any roles, let alone main ones, I still have empathy for her as a fellow human being. She obviously was going through a lot at the time, and she obviously got over it, so good for her. I also don't go around calling women crazy for venting or getting emotional after a divorce. I don't think acting rashly because your emotions were intense is something that we should hold against anyone forever, even after they show growth. I also don't reject someone's story just for lack of evidence. Her story could be true or false, she is the one to know. I wouldn't go around badmouthing anyone she mentioned because "I believe her", and I also can't call her a liar just because she "shared some messages out of context". She could be telling the truth, but doesn't have the evidence to support it, so she ended up resorting to actions you find "petty" and "crazy". I don't know! Neither do you. Because even though we were "around" when this broke out, we were not part of that relationship. So we shouldn't act like we were.

I can't research your view or opinion on something as none of what you've said is a fact. They lack chemistry? It could totally be because they've had an affair that they lack chemistry on screen. AHJ had to apologize? So what, really? It could be because he felt bad that it went public. I like OYS as an actress. Out of those three, she is the only one whose acting skills I actually acknowledge. I just don't know these people well enough to know what they do behind the scenes, and neither any of you. You are even pretending that you know her well enough to know that she "has tendency to make things up". That actually says a lot about your prejudice, bias and "research skills". I did follow the scandal back then, I just didn't follow your conclusions because it's all on your heads. Can't help you if you can't differentiate between your assumptions and facts.

I personally didn't think it was that rude. I thought it was a part of the episode's concept, but your argument that her rejection of gifts is because it's her generation's ways is flawed. Because she is a millennial, not a GenZ, which makes her behavior not explained by what generation she is part of, since millennials are pretty much known for being too considerate to the point of being pushovers, and she is not. A typical millennial wouldn't have rejected a gift in case that hurt the other person's feeling. They would accept it, and would've even felt bad giving it away to someone else (re-gifted it) in case that person finds out. Ye Eun is NOT a GenZ even though she is acting like one.

Anyway, it is a variety show and that was kind of a lame game, I'm not sure why people are being sensitive about it. I didn't think it was that bad, I think what was extremely rude was her behavior when she visited JongKook's house, but that didn't seem to bother anyone for some reason.

Are people really still talking about it? If you hate her so much just say she is a bad actress and you will be applauded for being 100% correct. Why bother talking about something that isn't any of your business and look awfully hateful and nosy? Stop bothering people about their divorce and grow up. You can't prosecute her for "reacting badly to her divorce". Of course she would react badly to the end of a long-term relationship, she is only a human.

What wrongful accusations? And how do you know it's wrongful? Don't get me wrong, I'm genuinely glad this "actress" stopped acting only because she is really bad at it. But c'mon guys, her divorce, and her reaction to it, is her business. If she "wrongfully" accused someone, that someone alone has the right to demand an apology, but never came across any article that says Oh Yeon Seo demanded an apology, so why are you and who are you to demand it? It's their business. She and Oh Yeon Seo are the only ones who know if it's actually wrongful or not, or if an apology is needed, so leave them be, and stop jumping on it every time this person is mentioned. You don't want to side with someone without knowing all the information.

Once a queen, always a queen.

I think it might be because you see her as a child, I do too, but I think she is a good actress.

I enjoyed this more than the first one. I thought the first one had more of a serious note which didn't suit it, so I was postponing watching this, thinking it would be the same. However, it turned out it was funnier than I expected

I forgot about those guys, but still we have the old lady who woke up an assassin. I also don't think you can get comfortable with shooting someone (or multiples) after one day at the shooting range (or ever), but I will let it slide. The first guy I think was the most unrealistic one to be honest. He went to therapy because he was afraid to act on his emotions but kept a whole lot of guns inside his bed. I mean isn't getting rid of you guns the first thing you do so that you don't get tempted, even before going to therapy?

P.S. The first part with the uni-shooting was in his imagination.

I would rather be entertained by something that isn't silly to the point of being funny. I love mindless action, just not mindless action that pretends to be more sophisticated than it is. It doesn't even make a realistic societal view. Not all people who get a gun would use it. It pretends that it's a reflection of society when it is highly "imaginative". If they haven't done enough in 10 episodes, they won't do it in more. I only have the last episode to go and they still haven't gotten to their story.

I don't think I remember seeing a grown man using them (except for cops and villains). I was talking about the old lady and the two high school boys. They haven't had any mandatory service, and they are not trained, but they handled it like it's so easy. What man were you referring to? I only remember those three.

Too unrealistic yet too predictable. The script is too silly. Guns to the same person are both scary and so easy to use. One moment they fall down because they can't believe something that scary is in their presence, the next they are using it so comfortably. The idea that anyone will use a gun once given one is so silly, I can't really digest it. Abused or not, most people don't stomach the idea of taking a life away even if it's an evil one. "Guns in Korea? Are you crazy!", and then BAAM, let's all sing and whistle while we hand them out like candies to babies. Watching this just for Kim Nam Gil, but I'm really not buying it.

I'm really not sure how you arrived to the conclusion that they are saying she is unattractive. She looks pretty cute, and I'm sure everyone in her class thinks she is adorable.

Not sure how this is relevant. I think people should stop associating tangled hair with curly hair. You can be curly but do not have a tangled hair. Same as with straight vs thin/dull. You can have both, either or none, they are not mutually exclusive. Curly hair isn't bad and they didn't say it's bad. This character has a tangled hair which is bad, and it's why people of all hair types brush their hair. They are not mocking her for her curly hair, but conveying her problems with her tangled hair. It isn't the same. Also, you can have a straight and tangled hair. Tangled hair isn't a feature that only happens when the hair is curly. It's just that curly hair is more famously harder to manage.

Yoon Kye Sang is my favorite actor, but I'm really having a hard time watching this. I wanted to watch a story of an underdog. While their team is supposedly an underdog, because the players aren't all that good, the fact that it's just a regular high school team with no challenges makes this boring. The story itself is cliche. It is the number #1 go-to story when they make a sport movie or drama. A disgraced well-known coach is assigned to coach a bunch of misfits. The thing is, that we have seen this done so many times with players with all kinds of challenges: autism, blindness, females...etc. Now seeing those regular guys who are not really challenged is just so uninteresting. It is not even funny. I haven't laughed once yet. I hope that it will get interesting but I really doubt it. All the characters are one-dimensional, and they have only one personality trait that they are constantly having.

I thought of an alternative twist, asked Chatgpt to turn it into a movie script, and broke into sweat reading it. I don't know if it has been done before, because I don't watch a lot of horror, but I found it more intriguing, and I choose to believe it.

This is the first time in my life I was actually rooting for him to jump out the window. I thought he deserved it. I was so annoyed at him not selling the currency that I thought I'd like him to jump so that I would stop watching. What's wrong with living with your mom?

It's ridiculous and annoying. It ruined my weekend