13 or 15, she was still a kid. Legal or not whats appalling is the age gap.
You can't list a single piece of circumstantial evidence, that supposedly you refute as 'insufficient'.
How do you know the evidence is insufficient if you don't even know what that evidence IS. You refuse to look. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Prove me wrong, and list all the specific evidences you believe are insufficient as proofs.
Even if he "wins" in court, i don't see him reach the success he once had. Thank globalisation.
I don't give a shit what court thinks. I know what I think. OJ killed Nicole. K-Diddy groomed a child, and then later extorted her when her body was too mature to turn him on anymore. It's glaringly obvious.
He can't hide from this, and he won't ever be able to bury it. He's done. It's just that bigger ships take longer to sink.
People don't commit suicide out of anger.I like how you are so focused on what people are calling him, and not…
List the proofs you've seen that you don't believe constitute proof.
Because I contend you haven't been following the receipts at all, that you skip over that news and you don't actually know what proofs we are discussing. Otherwise you wouldn't have made that comment.
You don't care about the case. You are an old man with a predilection for young girls, and you see a superstar get put under the microscope and judged for something you don't see as wrong. It makes you nervous, so you try to defend your aberrant sexual proclivities through the anonimity of online exchange, to try to add your voice to those attempting to manufacture false cultural consent to the practice of nasty old men sexualizing children.
Should have write *defending pedos in my free time* in ur profile bio.Also why most of his defenders talk like…
Yes lets put everyone in jail for the actions of a pdf.
By your logic, if every single one of us isn't running our own 'To Catch a Predator' show or signing up for bounty hunter classes, we belong in jail because pdf's *exist*.
I feel like the more this whole thing drags, more people are siding with him and believing his lies. Recently…
He's a pariah now. Less people are siding with him. He has no endorsements left, Disney is washing their hands of everything to do with him. The on-the-street average normie opinion of him is irreparably tarnished.
You need to watch the drip-drip of evidence and Garosero's understanding of the news cycle work. This is being dragged out **because if they did it all at once really quick it would have been nothing more than a news blip**.
The longer this drags out, the worse it gets for him. Think OJ, Bill Cosby, Max Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, Dahvie Vanity.
13 or 15, she was still a kid. Legal or not whats appalling is the age gap.
Oh you mean like OJ was proven guilty of murdering Nicole in courtroom?
This isn't court. The circumstantial evidence, when taken as a WHOLE, paints a clear picture that you'd have to be purposefully exercising obtuseness to ignore.
Let's take the extortion. If he and GM were innocent, that would be an easy disprove, since companies keep track of their finances, billing, and communications. If it really did cost a half a million USD to cover KSR's legal fees for the DUI, they would be able to show that proof based on accounting records. If he or GM had sent nonthreatening communications to her, and if they hadn't ghosted her, they would have proof.
He is possibly on the hook to Disney for 100+ mil usd. Do you think he would have come out with any receipts he might have that he's NOT guilty of the allegations? What you have seen from him is as robust a defense as he can muster. And it's as flimsy as wet paper.
He and GM have been caught in multiple lies over the past month. KSR's family has been caught in NO lies over the past month.
There's only two options here: 1) You think KSH is attractive looking and/or 2) You personally don't see anything morally wrong with a 15 year old being courted by a near-30 year old who has the most unequal power dynamic possible with her, so seeing the way people react to it when it's exposed scares you because you know they'd judge you the same way if they knew how you really think.
men will always be men, even in korea. this is sad but i hope it wakes up those women who watch some kdramas and…
This is not about gender. This is about mental illness and evil. Which can come in the form of either gender. And needs to be held to account so there are eventually no more child victims in this world. The idea that sometimes kids just get predated on by sick evil people might be true at this moment in time, but that's not something I'm willing to give up and accept for the future of this earth.
Should have write *defending pedos in my free time* in ur profile bio.Also why most of his defenders talk like…
> "You have to first know the criteria for pedophile..."
Someone who sexualizes children.
This man has shown a clear pattern of:
*holding sexual views about children (as evidenced by his off-color comments and behavior towards prepubescent girls in the past)
*dumping women once their bodies become fully mature (as evidenced by his dating history)
*only seeing women through the lens of age (as evidenced by the fact that he said when he was 41, he would marry a 21 year old. When he thought about getting married, the first criteria he has is their AGE).
That is abnormal. It means he's not looking for a special woman to form a meaningful relationship with. He's looking for someone who fits his fetishistic predilections.
Add it up.
Not only that, but he's aware of his condition, and this is evidenced by his text to KSR about how he was "just being cautious". What would he have to be cautious of? He knows what he's doing is morally repugnant.
1 
1 
1 
1 
How do you know the evidence is insufficient if you don't even know what that evidence IS. You refuse to look. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Prove me wrong, and list all the specific evidences you believe are insufficient as proofs.
Why does that bother you so much?
whether or not the allegations have been sufficiently established depends on your threshhold of "sufficiently".
You are biased, so you reject all the evidences against him. You can't even list them. You don't know what they are.
Because you don't even know what the evidences are.
Got it.
He can't hide from this, and he won't ever be able to bury it. He's done. It's just that bigger ships take longer to sink.
He has FAR more to lose by losing Disney and Prada than he does in court.
> Note: Pay attention to what you did, you pushed his age from 27 to 30, but not hers from 15 to 18.
Because 15 ---> 27 makes it okay to you?????
Because I contend you haven't been following the receipts at all, that you skip over that news and you don't actually know what proofs we are discussing. Otherwise you wouldn't have made that comment.
You don't care about the case. You are an old man with a predilection for young girls, and you see a superstar get put under the microscope and judged for something you don't see as wrong. It makes you nervous, so you try to defend your aberrant sexual proclivities through the anonimity of online exchange, to try to add your voice to those attempting to manufacture false cultural consent to the practice of nasty old men sexualizing children.
It won't work.
By your logic, if every single one of us isn't running our own 'To Catch a Predator' show or signing up for bounty hunter classes, we belong in jail because pdf's *exist*.
That makes zero sense.
You need to watch the drip-drip of evidence and Garosero's understanding of the news cycle work. This is being dragged out **because if they did it all at once really quick it would have been nothing more than a news blip**.
The longer this drags out, the worse it gets for him. Think OJ, Bill Cosby, Max Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, Dahvie Vanity.
This isn't court. The circumstantial evidence, when taken as a WHOLE, paints a clear picture that you'd have to be purposefully exercising obtuseness to ignore.
Let's take the extortion. If he and GM were innocent, that would be an easy disprove, since companies keep track of their finances, billing, and communications. If it really did cost a half a million USD to cover KSR's legal fees for the DUI, they would be able to show that proof based on accounting records. If he or GM had sent nonthreatening communications to her, and if they hadn't ghosted her, they would have proof.
He is possibly on the hook to Disney for 100+ mil usd. Do you think he would have come out with any receipts he might have that he's NOT guilty of the allegations? What you have seen from him is as robust a defense as he can muster. And it's as flimsy as wet paper.
He and GM have been caught in multiple lies over the past month. KSR's family has been caught in NO lies over the past month.
There's only two options here:
1) You think KSH is attractive looking
and/or
2) You personally don't see anything morally wrong with a 15 year old being courted by a near-30 year old who has the most unequal power dynamic possible with her, so seeing the way people react to it when it's exposed scares you because you know they'd judge you the same way if they knew how you really think.
The cancer will be excised.
In the infamous words of Austin Powers..... that's a man, baby!
I think this person is only defending KSH by proxy, when actually they are defending themselves.
Someone who sexualizes children.
This man has shown a clear pattern of:
*holding sexual views about children (as evidenced by his off-color comments and behavior towards prepubescent girls in the past)
*dumping women once their bodies become fully mature (as evidenced by his dating history)
*only seeing women through the lens of age (as evidenced by the fact that he said when he was 41, he would marry a 21 year old. When he thought about getting married, the first criteria he has is their AGE).
That is abnormal. It means he's not looking for a special woman to form a meaningful relationship with. He's looking for someone who fits his fetishistic predilections.
Add it up.
Not only that, but he's aware of his condition, and this is evidenced by his text to KSR about how he was "just being cautious". What would he have to be cautious of? He knows what he's doing is morally repugnant.