I think my problem with recent articles stems from seeing this website shift slowly from being a user based article…
Yeah the shift to a mass of spam-like bot posted articles about inconsequential things is seriously off-putting. Plenty of spam/bot ratings & reviews on drama pages too.
New drama announcements and occasional articles on ratings is still fine (no need to closely monitor every weekâs ratings for every drama though, just if someone is setting some records. Thereâs far too many variables that affect a TV showâs rating to take it too seriously).
Found the second account of the notorious low grade gossip reposter lo_ve !âdoing what is justâ Lmao. Like…
I donât even know these celebs lmao. Quite grand of you to assume everyone cares.
This is the first time Iâm seeing this woman in my life as a minor supporting character in the currently ongoing popular drama Queen of Tears.
Whoâs dating who is peak gossip fodder. Itâs their private lives and in the entertainment industry, short romantic flings and breakups are too way common to be excited about every dating news, unless itâs tied with a marriage certificate.
Congratulations to this new couple (Edit: just read, old couple) but I donât even know who they are. Ergo I donât care to know about their private lives. We have plenty of tabloids to peruse that kind of information. This site which presents itself as a quality forum of user reviews deserves better than the trash that lo_ve peddles so often.
Edit: lmao. Your mentality summed up in two words you said: âdating is newsworthyâ. Maybe pick up an actual newspaper sometime and read real news headlines. Gossip about entertainersâ love lives does not equate to real news.
Easely better than US show like "the walking dead" but we can't compare as TWD was one of the first. Just an example,…
I wouldnât call the girl crush talk in the middle of recklessly parkouring all that unrealistic. These are hormonal teenage boys. Both- their priorities and sense of danger are going to be skewed.
Besides the last interaction the ML boy had before literal zombies descended was an argument with his FL confessing to another guy. His feelings and brain was stuck on that note. And itâs far simpler and easier to be distracted with normal issues rather than dare to think about the foreboding implications of the end of the world as they knew it.
(Itâs also a staple of male-led action movies where characters chitchat about absurd stuff in life-threatening situations).
He might not have a loveline you know. . .SKJ didnât have a love interest in his last drama, not much of one…
The problem they need to investigate is probably within the student body, requiring them to get close to the kids when they wonât be willing to open up to adults. Like in Class of Lies the guy was totally failing to gain the trust of the kids he was there to investigate as a fake substitute teacher.
This is actually happening? I honestly never expected them to come back to this, despite the cliffhanger it ended on
I hope they maintain the quality of the plot or better it. Would be a crime to ruin a good show with a botched sequel years later.
So⊠does this mean I can hope to see a second season for all the other Kdramas that teased us with a cliffhanger at the end? Especially Vagabond that apparently never got to its core plot before it endedâŠ
is a grown ass man gonna act as a high schooler? fall in love w a high school student? their mom? odd premise…
He might not have a loveline you know. . .
SKJ didnât have a love interest in his last drama, not much of one in Watcher either. Not all Kdramas have romances, especially not these days.
The character is going undercover in a school to investigate some case, not to fall in love with a teenager. Like the ML in 18 Again doesnât try to weirdly woo kids just because heâs physically an attractive teen again . He still treated them like an uncle and tried to ward off any inappropriate crushes.
Hi Anika. You stated previously that âbecause of one actor who thinks itâs disgusting to play a gay role they…
Well thatâs why Iâm saying. If thereâs been no statement, behaviour from the actor himself or his agency that hints as such and neither has there been any confirmation or reports of him or his agency demanding a script to be changed to their liking, then it is irresponsible and dishonest to spread rumours just because we speculate or think that might be the cause for the BL content being removed. For all we know the actor had nothing to do with the decision.
Hi Anika. You stated previously that âbecause of one actor who thinks itâs disgusting to play a gay role they…
It is disgusting to invent and spread rumours based on your personal opinions of what you *think* *might* have happened. You are literally putting words in someoneâs mouth by saying âActor X finds gay disgusting so BL is removed in his upcoming dramaâ.
If you do not have any sort of evidence to support your claims, no statements he said, no behaviour he showed, then what you are doing is irresponsible and dishonest.
And even if an actor doesnât wish to play a particular part, it is perfectly within their rights to not sign up for it. Their face and body *is* the product they sell. And it does not necessarily mean they are being discriminatory if they are not comfortable playing certain types of roles or scenes. Like Ji Chang Wook doesnât want to do action, even though heâs good at it and is well-loved for it. Some actors dislike intimate scenes. A heterosexual person or even a closeted LGBT person may not be comfortable playing gay character. Etc.
If this dramaâs producers wanted to stay true to the source material and keep the BL part, they could cast actors willing and comfortable to play the roles. If YCY indeed is not comfortable with playing a gay character, then looking at the source material of drama script, he should have had the right to not sign up for it (we have no way of knowing how he feels about this whole thing without an actual statement from him).
You either live in your own little delulu world or are one heck of a shameless liar trying to run dumb propaganda.
âBombsâ âby Israelâ do not result in a man being *beheaded* in a Palestine city when he was one of *many* LGBTQs seeking *asylum* In Israel because he received *death threats for being gay in Palestine*.
New drama announcements and occasional articles on ratings is still fine (no need to closely monitor every weekâs ratings for every drama though, just if someone is setting some records. Thereâs far too many variables that affect a TV showâs rating to take it too seriously).
(Itâs right before they come across the bullied halfbie crazy girl in their search for phones for outside news).
This is the first time Iâm seeing this woman in my life as a minor supporting character in the currently ongoing popular drama Queen of Tears.
Whoâs dating who is peak gossip fodder. Itâs their private lives and in the entertainment industry, short romantic flings and breakups are too way common to be excited about every dating news, unless itâs tied with a marriage certificate.
Congratulations to this new couple (Edit: just read, old couple) but I donât even know who they are. Ergo I donât care to know about their private lives. We have plenty of tabloids to peruse that kind of information. This site which presents itself as a quality forum of user reviews deserves better than the trash that lo_ve peddles so often.
Edit: lmao. Your mentality summed up in two words you said: âdating is newsworthyâ. Maybe pick up an actual newspaper sometime and read real news headlines. Gossip about entertainersâ love lives does not equate to real news.
Although both have a list of blockbuster hits.
(Scriptwriter: CLOY; Legend of the Blue Sea;
The Producers and My Love from the star.
The female Director: Vincenzo; Little Women; Crowned Clown; Soundtrack).
âdoing what is justâ Lmao. Like sharing gossip about celebrities dating life is a matter of justice.
Imagine boycotting remakes of a remake of a German show just because Hitler.
But ofcourse no one will call out these Palestinian supporters for antisemitism or anything.
Besides the last interaction the ML boy had before literal zombies descended was an argument with his FL confessing to another guy. His feelings and brain was stuck on that note. And itâs far simpler and easier to be distracted with normal issues rather than dare to think about the foreboding implications of the end of the world as they knew it.
(Itâs also a staple of male-led action movies where characters chitchat about absurd stuff in life-threatening situations).
I hope they maintain the quality of the plot or better it. Would be a crime to ruin a good show with a botched sequel years later.
So⊠does this mean I can hope to see a second season for all the other Kdramas that teased us with a cliffhanger at the end? Especially Vagabond that apparently never got to its core plot before it endedâŠ
SKJ didnât have a love interest in his last drama, not much of one in Watcher either. Not all Kdramas have romances, especially not these days.
The character is going undercover in a school to investigate some case, not to fall in love with a teenager. Like the ML in 18 Again doesnât try to weirdly woo kids just because heâs physically an attractive teen again . He still treated them like an uncle and tried to ward off any inappropriate crushes.
Like seriously, what. the. f. Does a war have to do with LGBT rights or a damn kdrama?!??
And whatever Palestineâs situation with Israel right now, it doesnât negate the fact that gays are persecuted for being gay in Palestine.
If you do not have any sort of evidence to support your claims, no statements he said, no behaviour he showed, then what you are doing is irresponsible and dishonest.
And even if an actor doesnât wish to play a particular part, it is perfectly within their rights to not sign up for it. Their face and body *is* the product they sell. And it does not necessarily mean they are being discriminatory if they are not comfortable playing certain types of roles or scenes. Like Ji Chang Wook doesnât want to do action, even though heâs good at it and is well-loved for it. Some actors dislike intimate scenes. A heterosexual person or even a closeted LGBT person may not be comfortable playing gay character. Etc.
If this dramaâs producers wanted to stay true to the source material and keep the BL part, they could cast actors willing and comfortable to play the roles. If YCY indeed is not comfortable with playing a gay character, then looking at the source material of drama script, he should have had the right to not sign up for it (we have no way of knowing how he feels about this whole thing without an actual statement from him).
âBombsâ âby Israelâ do not result in a man being *beheaded* in a Palestine city when he was one of *many* LGBTQs seeking *asylum* In Israel because he received *death threats for being gay in Palestine*.