Yoo Ah In and Shin Se Kyung in the same drama again? Really? Hope they won't be a couple because in Fashion King,…
I'm curious. Was it the acting that was bad, or the actual progression and ending of the drama? At the time, I watched the first 5 episodes, and I saw nothing exceptionally untoward. In the latter half, did the actors, and Se Kyung in particular, just ruin the drama? There are many korean actors out there, that are poor, so I'm just perplexed to how some are targeted, and some aren't. It's always the female actor. And if she's dating some idol, the hatred is off the charts.
It seems that ep 1 was deleted from Viki due to copyright claims; any idea where to watch it and where it might…
I started watching it, and only the first 6 minutes were subbed. But I'm not complaining! No way, jose. I imagine it must be hard finding thai subbers, so I'm just chill waiting.
Ok, I've reached ep 13. But I'll have to admit; the (EDIT) 'Stubborn' character of Ming Xiao Xi is really getting…
No!
No.
I don't want you to go through episode by episode. That will be loooooooooong. It's just that you used that phrase, I asked you to define it, and the example you gave didn't fit. But then you used stubbornness, and I was uh-huh! Now you are consulting a thesaurus and it's greatly appreciated.
This is dramaland. I'm sure if Ming Xiao really didn't want to run into the guys, she'd transfer, and live quietly somewhere else But where is the fun in that? If everyone in every drama, avoided one another and succeeded, it would be boring as hell. Maybe in the beginning she wanted to avoid them, but Bing is forcibly entering her life too - he even went as far, as moving into her bedroom! How can you hide, when you're being sought so ferociously? In the latter episodes, she is okay and likes interacting with them (though she pretends Bing is a nuisance, but secretly...you can tell she likes having him around), though sometimes thinks twice, only because Sha Sha appears hurt. Anyways, don't take it too seriously. Compared to some nightmares out there, she's alright.
Ok, I've reached ep 13. But I'll have to admit; the (EDIT) 'Stubborn' character of Ming Xiao Xi is really getting…
I love a debate as much as the next person. However, my opponent has to be consistent in his or her views and not be self-contradictory, because the person is putting holes in their own argument without my help needed.
I asked you to expand your argument. You accepted the gauntlet. I repeated your own argument back at you, because sometimes holding up a mirror is the best way for the opponent to see their contradictions.
Narrow-mindedness is an abstract theory, that shouldn't be related to materialistic things unless it's in relation to another person. Ming Xiao Xi never condemns another person's fashion. She just refuses to change her own. That to me, isn't narrow-mindedness, it is stubbornness. Which is the term you should've used from the beginning.
You state being righteous and sincere is akin to being weak, dumb and pathetic. They are not synonyms. You are using incorrect terminology again. I think I understand where you're coming from, but I need examples aligned to their correct definitions for me to properly counteract them.
Which is why I was being curt and brief, and I apologize if it seemed I was backing down. I wasn't. I was just waiting for you to step up.
Ok, I've reached ep 13. But I'll have to admit; the (EDIT) 'Stubborn' character of Ming Xiao Xi is really getting…
So you think she is narrow-minded because she isn't fashion forward, has morals and likes sticking by them and that makes her look weak, dumb, simple minded and pathetic? I'm just repeating what you said, back at you.
When I first saw him in his 80's flower-printed blazer, I wasn't impressed, but he is able to be oddly menacing when he wants :) In fact, the flower-printed clothes just makes him even more sinister....pretty smile, deadly eyes.
I would've given this a 10 at episode 16. It started of a little cliche, and then it became extremely extremely addictive. If the last two episodes hadn't have happened, it would be 10 for sure. But I was disappointed we didn't see daughter and mother reuniting on screen. It happened OFF-SCREEN. That was pretty unforgivable in my opinion. If this had been 24 episodes, everything would've been wrapped up nicely instead of it being rushed.
Siwon shone in ep 6. It was too funny, watching him taking care of a sick Seong Joon, and then sashaying his hips in the kitchen the morning after. I am shipping Seong Joon/Shin Hyuk now, lol :D Ha Ri...how could she do that? But I'm so, so happy that Seong Joon is noticing Hye Jin for who she is...still doesn't explain his harsh language from before, but we're getting tantalizing flashbacks.
How on earth is she THIRTY?!?!?! She didn't look a day older than 25....
Some people look older than their years. Some people look younger. What's the big deal? I don't get these comments feigning surprise...fair enough, if it's a sixty-year old....
No.
I don't want you to go through episode by episode. That will be loooooooooong. It's just that you used that phrase, I asked you to define it, and the example you gave didn't fit. But then you used stubbornness, and I was uh-huh! Now you are consulting a thesaurus and it's greatly appreciated.
This is dramaland. I'm sure if Ming Xiao really didn't want to run into the guys, she'd transfer, and live quietly somewhere else But where is the fun in that? If everyone in every drama, avoided one another and succeeded, it would be boring as hell. Maybe in the beginning she wanted to avoid them, but Bing is forcibly entering her life too - he even went as far, as moving into her bedroom! How can you hide, when you're being sought so ferociously? In the latter episodes, she is okay and likes interacting with them (though she pretends Bing is a nuisance, but secretly...you can tell she likes having him around), though sometimes thinks twice, only because Sha Sha appears hurt. Anyways, don't take it too seriously. Compared to some nightmares out there, she's alright.
I asked you to expand your argument. You accepted the gauntlet. I repeated your own argument back at you, because sometimes holding up a mirror is the best way for the opponent to see their contradictions.
Narrow-mindedness is an abstract theory, that shouldn't be related to materialistic things unless it's in relation to another person. Ming Xiao Xi never condemns another person's fashion. She just refuses to change her own. That to me, isn't narrow-mindedness, it is stubbornness. Which is the term you should've used from the beginning.
You state being righteous and sincere is akin to being weak, dumb and pathetic. They are not synonyms. You are using incorrect terminology again. I think I understand where you're coming from, but I need examples aligned to their correct definitions for me to properly counteract them.
Which is why I was being curt and brief, and I apologize if it seemed I was backing down. I wasn't. I was just waiting for you to step up.