bayanoh

Pointless and unrealistic. The villain was one of the very few highlights of this, the action scenes are good but there are too few of them, and the rest is just boring. Even the post-credit scene was totally uninteresting. I wouldn't watch what they are teasing.

Love the new poster. Dooly was a recurring character throughout Running Man. I remember the characters being mentioned since the earliest episodes of Running Man, so it is relevant. I'm glad the winner of the deciding episode chose this theme instead of their own because I was sincerely rooting for it.

Very predictable. They give you obvious clues from the start. It is hard to take it seriously. No twists and no shocks. You can see what's coming a mile away.

Loved it. It was hilarious.

episode 60

It's more like The TruGary Show episode where they did the same thing to Gary.

You are not as intelligent as you think if you think that you can measure someone's intelligence by looking at their movie preferences.

I'm trying hard to finish this. The short scenes are giving me a headache and the sequence doesn't make sense. I think they are trying too hard to make the film look sophisticated, especially with the filming angles, like the one where he is talking to his kid while she is playing on the swing. It looks like a bizarre dream that I don't want to have because I know I will wake up with a headache.

He is on a timeline on his own. He is probably the only highly paid actor in that timeline. The main story is in the other timeline, he would just appear if there was a contact. Saying that they would reshoot the entire series is a stretch.

and again I'm not saying it wouldn't cost a dime, but if they canceled the whole series, they would have a certain 100% loss, if they delayed it too much people would lose interest and they would lose what they already spent on marketing. There is no guarantee that the situation would cool down, so they might not have a chance of airing it. From a production standpoint, their best move would be to reshoot his scenes, they would add extra to the budget, but they end up with the return that covers all the cost and more. Otherwise they are just throwing their money.

I'm not saying that there won't be any trade offs. There is canceling the broadcasting after all the cost and effort that has been put into it, and there is reshooting just the scenes where he is involved and cutting the scenes that could be cut. What is better in your opinion?

And no, they definitely wouldn't have to rewrite and re-film the entire thing. Just his scenes. They can even dub the new name post-production.

I'm sure there is the hope that you can change K-netizens' minds, but let's be realistic. They have to do something that doesn't involve a miracle.

Regardless of what I think about the controversy,
I think the character itself is replaceable.

Technically speaking, I think Jo Jin Woong did a great job portraying his character, but the plot involved a machine with two people communicating from different timelines. They can just create another character that stumbles upon the machine and it won't hurt the plot. They could've created a whole new time with completely new setting, if they hadn't already started, but since they did, a new character in the same time would totally work without jeopardizing much.

They said romantic, but in the sense that it triggers positive emotions or "romanticization" (whether around the place, the situation or the people).

It's probably because it was in a different location where the main PD couldn't go so she delegated the task to another PD. You can hear her voice in the next episode preview. They always announce beforehand if the main PD is changing.

Daniel is a member (a rental member is still a member)
In the preview of the next episode, they called Ye Eun, Daniel and Kang Hoon the youngest (maknae) members, but wrote in the caption under Ye Eun "real maknae", and under the other two "first rental member", and "second rental member"

You are bad at coming to conclusions. That's my conclusion. Nothing in my comments refer to her sex. If it was the guy who was doing that I would've arrived to the same conclusion. It's just that I was raised well. To me, raising a sharp object to threaten someone with it is almost as bad as stabbing them with it. I don't do that, I would never think it's ok or excusable, and I don't that's a valid way of letting the other person know that you are not a pushover. I thought we are having a discussion, but it appears that I have wasted my time. Have a good day.

because she is not just harming herself. She is harming other people. I don't expect perfection. I like leads being flawed, but I don't like when they act violently or aggressively towards others or intentionally hurt them or their feelings. I don't think it's a flaw I can just ignore, because it is inexcusable. It is not a character trait I should be celebrating or admiring. There are people who need therapy, and people who should be forced for the sake of others, she is the latter. If one's flaws include pulling a sharp object to threaten someone else, they need to be pulled out of society and put into a hospital.

You are literally describing a mental case and it's just like you are listing the reasons why she needs therapy.

"In her world, she is powerful.."
"She is pissed of.. determined that everyone will take her seriously"
"she was unprofessional"
"she considers ML her enemy because he tried to put her in her place..."
"since she was fired... she was too ferocious.."
These are signs that she needs help. Someone should guide her on how to resolve her disappointment of getting fired because she is not handling it well and harming other people in the process.

I don't even think she is competent at her work. She posted several articles so far and most of them turned out to be misleading, the last being the adulterer who turned out to be a father. Even though she was trying to expose him for something else, she ended up making him a victim because she was too careless.

About the apology, she said that she didn't want to accept his apology because if she did, she would expect him to be nice to her. (or he would expect her to be nice to her). Eitherway the reason is terrible.

I haven't seen any of those, but if you think that I'm annoyed by this female character just because she isn't weak or a "damsel in distress", you are very wrong. She is annoying because she is aggressive, and has so many red flags as a human being. I would like a tough female character who isn't a mental case. Have you heard why she didn't accept his apology? She needs to go to a psychiatrist ASAP.

P. S. I would also be put off by a male character who threatens people with a stabbing gesture using a pen. I think some people overlook her craziness and aggressiveness just because she is a "harmless girl" in their eyes or they think it's ok because "she didn't actually do it". That's just bad behavior regradless of her gender, "independent woman" personality and presumed "sense of justice".

I can foresee the cliche of "You made a deal with her to make me fall in love with you!". I guess that's what they are going for.

The female lead needs a mental health provider, not a relationship. That's the weirdest explanation for why she refused his apology, especially since she was the one who was supposed to apologize, not him. He really had every reason to think she was working there, but she never apologized for stepping on his face to escape through the window or for contributing to the publication of that misleading article about him.

I thought it would get better for me, but it didn't.
It felt like all of them are acting (I mean you can see that they are acting), and I think that was a director's choice, because most of the actors are known to be good actors. The directors may have chosen to go for overacting characters because they thought it was more memorable. It was especially obvious during action scenes where they are going against each other with their cars, motorbikes and trucks. This didn't really suit my taste. I don't like when I'm aware that the actors are acting.

Also, there are plenty of plot holes from start to finish. The story is as unrealistic as a non-fantasy drama could get.

I liked the movie, so this was a huge disappointment for me. I barely finished it. I was watching on 1.5x speed and I still got bored.