bayanoh

It went down hell recently, and it's starting to get better just a few episode ago.

He is a rental member. It means he is there for a limited number of episodes, just like Kang Hoon.

Bad scripting and directing with very few great action scenes. The action scenes are out of this world. Great acting. But the direction, particularly the transition between scenes, and the story are really bad. It is so boring, except for the action scenes.

This was terrible. They should've stopped at 3. The villain has only one move he keeps repeating. Ma Dong Suk only appears briefly. No good character or funny character in this. Even the characters who were hilarious in the previous installments were boring in this installment. The chief (Lee Bum Soo) barely has any scenes. Park Ji Hwan only looked funny (not really). It was a disaster. None of the charm of the previous installments was here. Villains were captured straight by police forces. Ma Dong Suk barely left a finger in this movie.

Mostly action
Former agent comes back to Korea to bring back the daughter he left behind when she was very young after she turned into an assassin.

You won't find any deeper details since it's not that deep. It's an entertaining action that relies mostly on fighting scenes. It's not bad if you ignored all the bad acting. No one except for Kim Ji-hoon and Park Hae-soo can act there, and they were both struggling with English.

Yeah but usually the scenes have full sentences. Like in the first one "if you realize..", it doesn't make sense on its own. Usually you have a complete sentence, not two different sentences mashed together. Regardless, I still think the script is awkward. Not just this mashed sentence.

Yes, I watched the trailer after, then realized it's two different scenes. Not sure why they combined them into one.

Oh, OK. I didn't expect anyone to analyze how I phrase my sentences. I'm neither a native English speaker nor a script writer. An AI probably would've used a more common phrasing, which made your intention rather confusing to me.

John Wick is the American Man From Nowhere. It is in no way an original. You can say that this is the TV version of Man From Nowhere, but you can't say it's the Korean version of its American derivative. It is kind of insulting. I get what you are trying to say anyways. They are all derivatives of the same original story.

There should be a limit to what you can say in a synopsis that correlates to the number of episodes. Spoiling the events of the first 3 episodes in a 7-episode drama is spoiling half of it for everyone who reads the synopsis.

What?! Haha
I don't know where that came from, or what triggered it. Are you offended? It's just a note I made. It could be that the translation is a bit awkward, making it feel like a conversation no one actually had. But it's just a random thought, why so defensive?

I'm sorry, but this sounds like an AI generated script. Not sure if it's just the translation, but it does sound like something a human wouldn't say.

I love when people pretend to be more "informed", instead of giving any kind of information (other than their opinions). It tells me that they either don't have any information to give, or haven't lived long enough to learn how to process information (i.e they just go with the first conclusion they come up with and stick with it). Either way, it's such conversation blocker, and it gives me a reason to stop the back and forth that I dislike. So, thank you too.

Again.. I WAS around when they were getting a divorce. I've been following this industry for more than two decades, and as you said, it was "unavoidable". The difference between me and you is that even though I hate her acting and I'm genuinely shocked that she got any roles, let alone main ones, I still have empathy for her as a fellow human being. She obviously was going through a lot at the time, and she obviously got over it, so good for her. I also don't go around calling women crazy for venting or getting emotional after a divorce. I don't think acting rashly because your emotions were intense is something that we should hold against anyone forever, even after they show growth. I also don't reject someone's story just for lack of evidence. Her story could be true or false, she is the one to know. I wouldn't go around badmouthing anyone she mentioned because "I believe her", and I also can't call her a liar just because she "shared some messages out of context". She could be telling the truth, but doesn't have the evidence to support it, so she ended up resorting to actions you find "petty" and "crazy". I don't know! Neither do you. Because even though we were "around" when this broke out, we were not part of that relationship. So we shouldn't act like we were.

I can't research your view or opinion on something as none of what you've said is a fact. They lack chemistry? It could totally be because they've had an affair that they lack chemistry on screen. AHJ had to apologize? So what, really? It could be because he felt bad that it went public. I like OYS as an actress. Out of those three, she is the only one whose acting skills I actually acknowledge. I just don't know these people well enough to know what they do behind the scenes, and neither any of you. You are even pretending that you know her well enough to know that she "has tendency to make things up". That actually says a lot about your prejudice, bias and "research skills". I did follow the scandal back then, I just didn't follow your conclusions because it's all on your heads. Can't help you if you can't differentiate between your assumptions and facts.

I personally didn't think it was that rude. I thought it was a part of the episode's concept, but your argument that her rejection of gifts is because it's her generation's ways is flawed. Because she is a millennial, not a GenZ, which makes her behavior not explained by what generation she is part of, since millennials are pretty much known for being too considerate to the point of being pushovers, and she is not. A typical millennial wouldn't have rejected a gift in case that hurt the other person's feeling. They would accept it, and would've even felt bad giving it away to someone else (re-gifted it) in case that person finds out. Ye Eun is NOT a GenZ even though she is acting like one.

Anyway, it is a variety show and that was kind of a lame game, I'm not sure why people are being sensitive about it. I didn't think it was that bad, I think what was extremely rude was her behavior when she visited JongKook's house, but that didn't seem to bother anyone for some reason.

Are people really still talking about it? If you hate her so much just say she is a bad actress and you will be applauded for being 100% correct. Why bother talking about something that isn't any of your business and look awfully hateful and nosy? Stop bothering people about their divorce and grow up. You can't prosecute her for "reacting badly to her divorce". Of course she would react badly to the end of a long-term relationship, she is only a human.

What wrongful accusations? And how do you know it's wrongful? Don't get me wrong, I'm genuinely glad this "actress" stopped acting only because she is really bad at it. But c'mon guys, her divorce, and her reaction to it, is her business. If she "wrongfully" accused someone, that someone alone has the right to demand an apology, but never came across any article that says Oh Yeon Seo demanded an apology, so why are you and who are you to demand it? It's their business. She and Oh Yeon Seo are the only ones who know if it's actually wrongful or not, or if an apology is needed, so leave them be, and stop jumping on it every time this person is mentioned. You don't want to side with someone without knowing all the information.

Once a queen, always a queen.

I think it might be because you see her as a child, I do too, but I think she is a good actress.